Jump to content

New Flats At ED Station - Be Warned! (it has a "veneer")


Zak

Recommended Posts

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Think Spider 69 was saying the opposite?

>


yes, cella, quite right, the tyre guy is doomed as he belongs to an earlier stage of the evolution of ED was what i said

a pity that spider edited his post after seeing mine responding to his original formulation of the tyre guy's problem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it says library not flats and as others have metioned, no sign of an M&S. seems silly to have two m&s's on lordship lane within less then a km away from eachtoher. we waited years for an m&s now we have two! waitross would be better!!


but if they are flats , no wonder banks are borrowing for new builds! cheap materials with greedy people behind them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Nigello,

> New Grove Vale library will have twice the current

> floor space. Fixtures and fittings paid for by the

> developer.


Hi, is there going to be another Marks and Spencer in the building?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was told by the woman working on the move that

> the new library will be bigger than the old one

> and there will be new fixtures and fittings. She

> said the move should be pretty easy because all

> they have to move is the books/CDs, etc.



According to one of the GV Libarian's the relocation has been postponed til December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sort of damage would be covered by insurance - once the build is complete and the building insure-abe. If it was M&S delivery lorries then responsible for damage they would need to reimburse the ground landlord (as I guess such fabric damage would be his responsibility to correct).


The use of facings/ cladding by the way (the 'veneer') is very common and quite acceptable in building - the fine 'Portland stone' built houses in Belgravia and Mayfair are actually stone clad (thin stone outer surface).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but, as posted previously, it's less about the insurance and more about the safety of pedestrians and the future safety working conditions of the library and M&S staff. Also what the local councillors are doing about it if anything?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I noticed today is that the corner that keeps getting knocked is a couple of foot back from the edge of the footpath. Clearly lorries are (illegally) cutting the footpath to make the turn; I'd have thought a couple of bollards should resolve the matter. Perhaps a camera to allow drivers to be prosecuted too?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is where the M&S deliveries will be so

> bollards not possible. More concerned about staff

> working in the building.


Why wouldn?t bollards on the edge of the pavement to protect that corner be possible. Surely it hasn?t been designed such that vehicles need to illegally cut the corner to navigate that turn?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...