Jump to content
Everywhere

Clear Things Up. Cyclists

DulwichMoan

By DulwichMoan
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

DulwichMoan

DulwichMoan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So DulwichMoan, get your lardy arse on a bike,

> before you get it pummelled!


I do take that as threatening behaviour, yet your the one hiding behind your computer screen,

pummelled, i take it your also one of these socks & sandal wearing numptys,

And since im 10 n half stone, i found myself far from fat.


DaveR to your statement about IQ tests. Yes perhaps they should, but then you wanna-be posh blubbering fools who think they know everything would not have one.


ive grown up in dulwich, and my gosh the change, ha you all think you live in the perfect area.

God open ur eyes, its south london, not chelsea :). Sorry that the true hurts people.

DaveR

DaveR

Posted
Posted

I'm confused now. I thought this was a cyclists vs motorists thread but now it's veered off into a posh wannabe incomers vs old school salt of the earth dulwich folk thread. Is that allowed?


Much more interesting is the potential fight in the offing between LadyDeliah and the 10 stone weakling who is DulwichMoan. I'd pay to see that.

malumbu

malumbu

Posted
Posted

The speed limit is the maximum, so in effect this is the minimum speed that you have to drive. Very few cyclists can get up to 30mph, therefore it is best to ride on the pavement.


The problem with pavements is the pedestrian. They have no rear view mirror, nor indicators (or will not make normal hand signals) and therefore do some very strange things such as suddenly stop without warning to check a text, or just cross the road without warning as they are listening to their i-pod or on the phone.



There should of course be a walking test, a footpath code, and prosecutions for those who fail to obey it.

  • 1 month later...
patsyD

patsyD

Posted
Posted
I agree with dm. People on bikes who go through red lights and then to the pavement in order to keep moving. Then look at you like your Hitler when you try to nudge them softly with your bumper. These are the same gentrified lovers of "freerange" meat that form long lines out side the butchers on LL going round the block. The same people who call their kids names like "abigail" and "Sebastian" and buy their kids Nirvana t shirts.
Horsebox

Horsebox

Posted
Posted

patsyD Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with dm. People on bikes who go through

> red lights and then to the pavement in order to

> keep moving. Then look at you like your Hitler

> when you try to nudge them softly with your

> bumper. These are the same gentrified lovers of

> "freerange" meat that form long lines out side the

> butchers on LL going round the block. The same

> people who call their kids names like "abigail"

> and "Sebastian" and buy their kids Nirvana t

> shirts.



Epic Trollfail. 0/10

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Pugwash
      Mugging on Dunstans Road 12/11/25

      By Pugwash · Posted

      Dunstans Road  comes under Dulwich Hill SNT- you can get their details on the Met Police website . I know that the Police are often patrolling Dawson Hights. Please contact them,
    • Earl Aelfheah
      Cyclist visibility

      By Earl Aelfheah · Posted

      No one is arguing that people should cycle without lights or reflectors. Obviously they should. It is also a legal requirement. But the colour of someone’s clothing? Is it ok to wear navy? What about green? What shade? At what point should we have ‘no reason for sympathy’ if they’re in a collision? I don’t want people to feel like they need special clothes just to walk or cycle. If you have lights and reflectors and you’re on well lit city streets, there is no reason why drivers shouldn’t be able to see you, assuming of course, that they're driving with due care and attention. But yes, if there are lots of people without lights, that should be addressed. I suspect in part, it's the change over in seasons and the fact that people are getting caught out by how early it's getting dark now (obviously no excuse).
    • NiteRyder
      Beige band / silver case Apple Watch SE found on Elsie Road

      By NiteRyder · Posted

      Found it but cannot contact owner as no email or message on it. e*****@icloud.com   please let me know if you’ve recently lost an Apple Watch SE
    • ElenaR
      Cyclist visibility

      By ElenaR · Posted

      What a passionate thread this is. I have worked in cycling for years, am a cyclist, a driver, use public transport etc. Driving last night with my two young kids, who also cycle, we made the same observations. It was the kids who first asked me why are most cyclists wearing full black and no lights. We then played a game who can spot all the cyclists, and count those with lights and those without. This teaches them to look out for them but also not to put themselves in a position where we have to strain to find them. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...