Jump to content

Recommended Posts

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So DulwichMoan, get your lardy arse on a bike,

> before you get it pummelled!


I do take that as threatening behaviour, yet your the one hiding behind your computer screen,

pummelled, i take it your also one of these socks & sandal wearing numptys,

And since im 10 n half stone, i found myself far from fat.


DaveR to your statement about IQ tests. Yes perhaps they should, but then you wanna-be posh blubbering fools who think they know everything would not have one.


ive grown up in dulwich, and my gosh the change, ha you all think you live in the perfect area.

God open ur eyes, its south london, not chelsea :). Sorry that the true hurts people.

I'm confused now. I thought this was a cyclists vs motorists thread but now it's veered off into a posh wannabe incomers vs old school salt of the earth dulwich folk thread. Is that allowed?


Much more interesting is the potential fight in the offing between LadyDeliah and the 10 stone weakling who is DulwichMoan. I'd pay to see that.

The speed limit is the maximum, so in effect this is the minimum speed that you have to drive. Very few cyclists can get up to 30mph, therefore it is best to ride on the pavement.


The problem with pavements is the pedestrian. They have no rear view mirror, nor indicators (or will not make normal hand signals) and therefore do some very strange things such as suddenly stop without warning to check a text, or just cross the road without warning as they are listening to their i-pod or on the phone.



There should of course be a walking test, a footpath code, and prosecutions for those who fail to obey it.

  • 1 month later...
I agree with dm. People on bikes who go through red lights and then to the pavement in order to keep moving. Then look at you like your Hitler when you try to nudge them softly with your bumper. These are the same gentrified lovers of "freerange" meat that form long lines out side the butchers on LL going round the block. The same people who call their kids names like "abigail" and "Sebastian" and buy their kids Nirvana t shirts.

patsyD Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with dm. People on bikes who go through

> red lights and then to the pavement in order to

> keep moving. Then look at you like your Hitler

> when you try to nudge them softly with your

> bumper. These are the same gentrified lovers of

> "freerange" meat that form long lines out side the

> butchers on LL going round the block. The same

> people who call their kids names like "abigail"

> and "Sebastian" and buy their kids Nirvana t

> shirts.



Epic Trollfail. 0/10

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sophie, I have to thank you for bringing me squarely into 2025.  I was aware of 4G/5G USB dongles for single computers, and of being able to use smartphones for tethering 4G/5G, but hadn't realised that the four mobile networks were now providing home hub/routers, effectively mimicking the cabled broadband suppliers.  I'd personally stick to calling the mobile networks 4G/5G rather than wifi, so as not to confuse them with the wifi that we use within home or from external wifi hotspots. 4G/5G is a whole diffferent, wide-area set of  networks, and uses its own distinct wavebands. So, when you're saying wi-fi, I assume you're actually referring to the wide-area networks, and that it's not a matter of just having poor connections within your home local area network, or a router which is deficient.   If any doubt, the best test will be with a computer connected directly to the router by cable; possibly  trying different locations as well. Which really leaves me with only one maybe useful thing to say.  :) The Which pages at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband/article/what-is-broadband/what-is-4g-broadband-aUWwk1O9J0cW look pretty useful and informative. They include local area quality of coverage maps for the four providers (including 5G user reports I think) , where they say (and I guess it too is pretty common knowledge): Our survey of the best and worst UK mobile networks found that the most common issues mobile customers have are constantly poor phone signal and continuous brief network dropouts – and in fact no network in our survey received a five star rating for network reliability. 
    • 5G has a shorter range and is worse at penetrating obstacles between you and the cell tower, try logging into the router and knocking it back to 4G (LTE) You also need to establish if the problem is WiFi or cellular. Change the WiFi from 5GHz to 2.4GHz and you will get better WiFi coverage within your house If your WiFi is fine and moving to 4G doesn't help then you might be in a dead spot. There's lots of fibre deployed in East Dulwich
    • Weve used EE for the past 6 years. We're next to Peckham Rye. It's consistent and we've never had any outages or technical issues. We watch live streams for football and suffer no lags or buffering.   All the best.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...