Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I saw something quite disturbing this am!


I was in the changing rooms at work getting dressed and some old boy 60ish was also getting changed....not that I was looking! but i noticed out of the corner of my eye some bizarre shirt tucking behaviour! He tucked his shirt into his underpants!!!, and then proceded to put his trousers on!


i have never witnessed this shirt tucking into underpants method before?! does it serve some kind of purpose? Does anyone in ED do this also?


It made me crack up in the changing room...and i had to make it look like I was choking/coughing!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1994-bizarre-shirt-tucking-behaviour/
Share on other sites

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a very disturbing thread.

> FnB, feel free to pop over to play with my wii,

> but keep your hands out of my pants!!


You two scare me..... ;-)


I was in the TA and when on parade in the summer, shirt sleave order, doing this means the shirt stay straighter, and you don;t get bollocked for looking "Like a sack of $hit tied up with string". Though something other hideous misdemeanour such as a badly ironed collar woudl see the bvollocking ensued anyway.


He might have a service history...


It's logical, but uncomfortable, I must say.


E

That's quite interesting if it does have a functional use then.


I've often wondered how some people are able to keep their shirts tucked in neat and tidy without it 'puffing' out....I may actually give this a go too now that there is a functional reason for it!

fractionater Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I may actually give this a go too now that there is a functional reason for it!


You'll be hooked for life...mark my words.....


Word of warning though, when untucking, exercise a degree of caution. It is all to easy to self wedgie if you're a bit too enthusiastic with you untucking..... =8-0

Rather that, than leaving shirts untucked. I'm talking the long sleeved variety. I have a real problem with it, no logical idea why. Perhaps it's a gay gene thing.


I used to know somebody who tucked his in, so that it wouldn't come out at the back. Remember John Forsythe from Dynasty, a secret underpant tucker-iner.

Only looks ridiculous if someone is watching you do it, or see's you take your trousers off (and you've forgotten to pull out the shirt first).


Obviously not to be done if you've scored with a young lady (not sure how it would go down in the gay community cdonline?!) and you're undressing in the throw's of passion - I think that would be a real bedroom killer!

fractionater Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only looks ridiculous if someone is watching you

> do it, or see's you take your trousers off


Technique would be, I imagine I have no experience of such a specific situation, would be to undo the shirt from the top, (Ti*'s first I'm no slag...) while claiming "kiss my chest you mad passionate fool" and take it off without untucking it.


Then whilest said chest is being kissed you can carefully untuck it yourself while maybe uttering "Of your kisses are like Ice to my fire" to keep partner distracted...being careful of course to avoid self induced wedgie, as mentioned previously....


I hope this helps someone....

its actually an old legacy from the days of yore when washing machines were a thing of the future,and basically so a man could get the maximum of 4 days wear from a pair of jocks ie wear for 2 days then turn inside out and wear for another 2 days,tucking your shirt into said same jocks prevented unsightly skid marks from appearing on the jocks and hence staining their appearance, not very nice in the morning when parading around the house and the missus has to look at it whilst devouring her porridge. that the skid mark was transferred to the shirt tail was irrelevant as the offending article was tucked into the jocks and consequently was,nt available for anyone to see. same principle also applies if you tuck the front of the shirt in, no piss stains.

hope that clears things up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...