Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A few weeks back I bought some extraordinarily expensive diffuser sticks, made by True Grace. It was a birthday present to myself. I did (obviously) smell the display sticks before I bought them.


On the box, it says "We make careful and natural choices of the finest ingredients to ensure both sustainability and excellence."


On a notice by a display (not in the shop I bought them from) it says ".... therapeutic home fragrance products - all made from carefully-selected and sustainable natural ingredients ......"


(Bold font is mine)


When I started using these sticks, the smell made me feel ill :(


I couldn't find a list of the ingredients online anywhere, so I emailed the company, who replied to say "Our products are made with essential oils."


I then emailed back to say I use essential oils a lot but that the diffuser was making me feel ill, so did it also have some synthetic scent or non-natural ingredient in it?


Surprise surprise I had no reply. I chased a couple of weeks later - still no reply. So I phoned them.


They have refused to tell me exactly what is in the diffuser. They sent me a MSDS sheet, which just says that the chemical identity is "Reeds Sacristy." (Sacristy is the name of the particular fragrance.)


When I pointed out that this wasn't terribly helpful, they emailed to say ..."the diffusers consist 75-85% of a carrier oil and 15-25% of fragrance, which is made from a mixture of essential oils and synthetic fragrance......the carrier oil is natural and I am assuming this is why my colleague told you that the diffuser was made from essential oils...." (!!!!!)


So, to come to the point, are they selling these "natural" products under false pretences?


Do I have any case for getting my money back from the shop I bought them from?


I go out of my way to avoid synthetic perfume, because just walking through a department store perfume section makes me feel ill :( and there is no way I would have bought these if I had thought they weren't completely natural :(


ETA: At the very least, it seems to me that the wording they use is misleading.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/200668-advice-re-consumer-problem/
Share on other sites

Sale of Good Act, reverse burden of proof for the first six months ie they have to prove that the product was not faulty. If you feel ill it is faulty. Also covers describing things accurately but probably best for going for the faulty argument. End of. You can Google the exact wording of the Regs. (Another good thing from the EU eh?).


You've also got distant selling regs too.


Trading Standards do not take enquiries anymore so you will be redirected to CAB, who will tell you similar to me.


Ultimately take them to court. But expect a stiff letter will do. I occasionally also post this as this can often have better results.


Despite how I may come across I don't spend all my time complaining, but get peed of by retailers for being ignorant of consumer rights.

Thanks Malumbu. I will look up the Sale of Goods Act.


My understanding was that the retailer rather than the manufacturer has to deal with it in the first instance, has that changed?


However, I'm not sure a product can be described as faulty just because I felt ill. True Grace sent me this MSDS sheet which says it does not cause irritation. I pointed out that I had no irritation, but that synthetic perfume makes me feel ill.


However I have never had any tests or anything to identify exactly what is causing me to feel ill (I just avoid synthetic perfume), and in any case as True Grace won't tell me what's in it, even if I had had it probably wouldn't help.


I wouldn't take them to court, too much hassle for a relatively small amount of money (fifty pounds. I can't believe I spent fifty pounds on a few sticks and a small bottle of liquid!)


ETA: It wasn't distant selling. I bought it from a store (so that I could smell it before I bought it) so I'm not covered by any law relating to that.

> I will look up the Sale of Goods Act.


The Consumer Rights Act 2015 would be more appropriate.


I think you're going to have to go to Wiltshire, to see what the Wardour Chapel really smells of. https://www.therecollectiononline.com/a-52052112/true-grace/true-grace-manor-scented-reeds-sacristy-250ml/ )

In deed, the Consumer Rights Act takes the relevant parts of SOGA and consolidates them nicely with other aspects of consumer law such as unfair contracts and competition law. It now also defines a reasonable time to inspect goods - 30 days, which before was rather subjective. The retailer is responsible (which always annoys me where they blame the manufacturer).


Don't use a credit card but there are also advantages here as you have extra protection due to the contract with the card provider.


It is much nicer when the retailer simply refunds you, and therefore there is good will and this also helps with word of mouth recommendations. Main issue I have had is with Dixons/Currys, there are numerous other good companies out there eg John Lewis Partnership and Richer Sounds. This is my personal experience.

It sounds like it wasn't honestly represented and/or the ingredient list was incomplete. The way they held off answering suggests they know that.


There does seem to be a loophole around that kind of thing though: look at all the beauty products, particularly hair serums, that are branded as 'Argan oil' but when you look closely the first four ingredients are silicones and there's less than 5% argan.


On a similar note, I avoid clothes labelled 'cotton-rich' or 'wool-rich' as it means that's not the main thing it's made of.

Looking at the sales materials quoted above, there is nothing that says "all natural ingredients" - indeed the wording seems quite carefully drafted to give an impression that only natural ingredients are used, without actually saying that in terms.


So you'd have to try and build an argument/case based on section 11 of the CRA, based on the clear impression given by the marketing materials. That would have been really difficult to do under the old patchwork of consumer legislation, but there should be a little bit more flexibility under the CRA (although still not the easiest). In particular you could argue that the heavy emphasis on the use of natural ingredients and the lack of reference to any other kind of ingredients was a sufficient description that any use of synthetic ingredients was a deviation from description within the scope of 11(1) of the CRA.


http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/section/11/enacted


editing for spelling

*write them a letter stating that you are the human man/woman xxxxx from the family xxxxxxxx,

informing them that their implied rights of access are withdrawn and that you are not driving

but travelling. then ask them if they are acting under their oath and demand a signature

in wet ink from the magistrate.


once done, give them a photocopy of the magna carta and send them on their way.



*some of the above advice may not be entirely relevant let alone factual accurate, but is gathered from a variety of credible sources, namely YouTube videos.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In the first instance simply go back to the shop

> with the product and explain the situation and

> you'll probably find it'll be resolved there and

> then.



Yes, thanks, that's what I'm going to do.


Thanks everybody for your useful advice!

niall Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *write them a letter stating that you are the

> human man/woman xxxxx from the family xxxxxxxx,

> informing them that their implied rights of access

> are withdrawn and that you are not driving

> but travelling. then ask them if they are acting

> under their oath and demand a signature

> in wet ink from the magistrate.

>

> once done, give them a photocopy of the magna

> carta and send them on their way.

>

>

> *some of the above advice may not be entirely

> relevant let alone factual accurate, but is

> gathered from a variety of credible sources,

> namely YouTube videos.



:)) :)) :))

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > I will look up the Sale of Goods Act.

>

> The Consumer Rights Act 2015 would be more

> appropriate.

>

> I think you're going to have to go to Wiltshire,

> to see what the Wardour Chapel really smells of.

> https://www.therecollectiononline.com/a-52052112/t

> rue-grace/true-grace-manor-scented-reeds-sacristy-

> 250ml/ )




:))


Thanks for that link, ianr, I don't even recall seeing those top/middle/base notes on the True Grace website (all of which appear to be essential oils ......)

If You only use essential oils usually (I too find that synthetic scents make me feel almost nauseous) My advice is to in future go to Niels Yard (theres a branch in Borough market)I get essential oils from there and either put them in one of the diffusers that they sell or on a lightbulb ring.

Ive never liked the reed thing-Ive never found one that gives a pure enough aroma

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I just googled: tell me you didn't pay ?50

> for a room diffuser...



I was seduced by the attractive packaging and the fact that it was in a very upmarket shop (alright I'll admit it, it was Heal's :)) They had a sale on, but this one wasn't in the sale).


It was coming up to my birthday and I had an urge to treat myself to something.


Any other time, I probably would have looked and passed by :(


ETA: I realise that to many ED residents Heal's probably isn't very upmarket, but it feels like it to me :))

NewWave Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If You only use essential oils usually (I too find

> that synthetic scents make me feel almost

> nauseous) My advice is to in future go to Niels

> Yard (theres a branch in Borough market)I get

> essential oils from there and either put them in

> one of the diffusers that they sell or on a

> lightbulb ring.

> Ive never liked the reed thing-Ive never found one

> that gives a pure enough aroma



I do sometimes buy oils from Neals Yard, usually the Covent Garden branch, but mostly I get them wholesale every few years from Amphora, including lavender oil in bulk. They probably aren't as high quality in some cases, but they are very much cheaper :)


I have had one of their electric diffusers for some years, but I find it annoying to have to keep topping up the water (first world problems). Also you can only use them where there is a socket to plug them into, which isn't always convenient.


I fairly recently discovered the Body Source diffusers, which I find more aesthetically pleasing, plus they have a timer so you can set them to turn off after a certain time (eg if you are going to sleep). But these also have the same disadvantages as the Neal's Yard ones. However they are cheaper. I have them in different rooms using different oils, eg for working, relaxing, whatever.


Having talked to a lovely woman who runs a stall in North Cross Road selling sticks which genuinely do only use essential oils (which I sadly noticed too late), I did a bit of googling and found you can get all the stuff online to make your own. So in future I am going to do that, and add my own oils. I will probably need to experiment a bit :)

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue, I just googled: tell me you didn't pay ?50

> > for a room diffuser...

>

>

> I was seduced by the attractive packaging and the

> fact that it was in a very upmarket shop (alright

> I'll admit it, it was Heal's :)) They had a sale

> on, but this one wasn't in the sale).

>

> It was coming up to my birthday and I had an urge

> to treat myself to something.

>

> Any other time, I probably would have looked and

> passed by :(

>

> ETA: I realise that to many ED residents Heal's

> probably isn't very upmarket, but it feels like it

> to me :))


To me, too, Sue (I'm a Lidl fan and out of the habit of buying luxury stuff). After seeing the price I felt a bit faint myself!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
    • Exactly the same thing happened to me a few years back; they were after my Brompton. Luckily there were only 3 of them so I managed to get away and got a woman to call the police, then they backed off, but not after having hit me in the back of the head first. Police said next time just give them what they want, but I sure as hell wasn't just going to hand over my bike to them!
    • In case anyone is renovating or stripping out an old kitchen, I am looking for a base kitchen unit or carcass to house an oven for a temporary set up kitchen.   Also looking for a run of worktop at least 180 cm long if anyone is disposing of something like this, I would be happy to collect.   thanks   Mila
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...