Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fazer71 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the results are used and the percentages quoted

> then they need to be put in context.

>

> Which ever way you look at it vote or

> consultation.

>

> The numbers show the views of just 21% of those

> who were asked.

>

> One can't honestly expect to rely/use/quote or

> believe that such a pathetic % of those questioned

> should provide a basis for making any decision. So

> they should be put in the bin.


However that is how our political system works, doesn't matter how many vote (it is their choice to vote or not to vote) it is the percentage of those that actually bothered to vote that counts..

gsirett Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> " Any claim about local business supporting the

> anti-CPZ campaign is both true AND absolutely

> worthless/meaningless. I remember about 10 years

> ago most of the same traders were against bus

> lanes. Claims of Lordship Lane apocalypse were

> rife. The bus lanes happened. The businesses

> prospered."

>

> Actually the local traders "whinged" about a

> permanant LL bus/red route. Nobody listened to

> them, what harm could it possibly do? A while

> later, with evidence of dramatically falling

> sales, a local councillor helped them get the

> decision reversed ( a local lib

>

> EVerybody thought they were just a load of

> whinging businesses, But their fears were proved

> right.

> Many of th businesses that we all love run on very

> tight margins. Nobody has problems parking at

> sainsburys or bluewater


And the Local Lab Councillors!

Three people telling other forumites to move and leave this thread alone. Surely the best way to let the thread die is not to contribute at all. If you feel it's no longer relevant to this section then ask the Administrator to move it but leave others that still want to discuss aspects of this highly charged issue alone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’m basing it on the fact that Jeremy Corbyn had repeatedly and on record said he is against mandatory vaccinations in any situation, and he wouldn’t disclose wether he had the Covid vaccine himself    as I said. Not as bad as his brother but very definitely a bit weird about the whole thing. Just say you had the vaccination Jeremy, say that everyone should and stop being weird in the middle of a global pandemic    it’s the same slippery evasive nonsense about Brexit and him. About Putin poisonings and him.     if you are happy with his evasiveness then you do you.  But there is a reason the country wouldn’t get behind him 
    • It was my understanding that Jeremy Corbyn was embarrassed by his brother and had distanced himself from his brother's views. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong. Why on earth should "the overall view of that family inform Jeremy's response to the pandemic"? What exactly are you basing that assumption on?
    • I guess it's best to do what most Brits do these days, keep your head down and say nothing! although that's probably why this country is in the mess it is today!  😞
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...