Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Slightly ashamed to write this post, but I am in a crap dilemma as to whether to get an iPhone 4s or a Samsung Galaxy S2 (or another Android phone). I have an iPad so I am not too fussed about apps. What do people recommend?


I do need to be able to set my work email up on it, which I know I can with a iPhone, I would also like Maps / GPS etc. A good camera is a must as is a front facing camera for Skype. Not much else I can really think of.


Any advice gratefully received.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20150-crap-dilemma/
Share on other sites

Both phones do all that your looking for......


Play with both and see which you prefer, Samsung has a brighter screen I'm told. Mail system arguably better on iPhone.


Potential downside to iPhone is you have to have iTunes set up on it.


You will get a better deal on the Samsung!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20150-crap-dilemma/#findComment-492974
Share on other sites

Android debuts Ice Cream Sandwich


The new Android OS, called the Ice Cream Sandwich, is meant to be a very slick interface that makes the iphone software looks dated. The new Galaxy Nexus uses this new OS and should meet Ratty's needs. Apparently the phone uses facial recognition as a method to lock/unlock the handset and also very capable on the emails.


But if you want to be don't know any better cool then go for the Iphone. It may not be the best phone on the market but with its price tag of ?700 you can show the world that you have more money than sense. Anyone for the Lighthouse Family... :-S

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20150-crap-dilemma/#findComment-493238
Share on other sites

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Android debuts Ice Cream Sandwich

>

> The new Android OS, called the Ice Cream Sandwich,

> is meant to be a very slick interface that makes

> the iphone software looks dated. The new Galaxy

> Nexus uses this new OS and should meet Ratty's

> needs. Apparently the phone uses facial

> recognition as a method to lock/unlock the handset

> and also very capable on the emails.

>

> But if you want to be don't know any better cool

> then go for the Iphone. It may not be the best

> phone on the market but with its price tag of ?700

> you can show the world that you have more money

> than sense. Anyone for the Lighthouse Family...

> :-S



Here we go......


Time to turn on the Bore-o-Meter.


"Hello"


"Hello, you rang me"


"Yes, on a telephone"


"OK,good-bye"


* que Hall & Oats *

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20150-crap-dilemma/#findComment-493251
Share on other sites

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Steve Jobs vowed to 'destroy' Android ... and

> would spend all of Apple's money and his dying

> breath if that is what it took to do so."


That would be Steve Job's the Buddhist who refused to get involved with the Bill Gates's Foundation to eliminate the diseases of poverty - priorities - he's probably having to explain this conumdrum to the non existent Lord Buddha as we speak.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20150-crap-dilemma/#findComment-493253
Share on other sites

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Steve Jobs vowed to 'destroy' Android ... and

> would spend all of Apple's money and his dying

> breath if that is what it took to do so."


Please buy an Iphone for ?700 and with its ?500 profit margin helps Apple with their worthy cause. :-S

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20150-crap-dilemma/#findComment-493312
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's called The Restorative Place. Also, the Fired Earth storefront is under offer too, apparently. How exciting...!
    • Perhaps the view is that there are fewer people needing social housing in London, going forward, or to cap it as it is rather than increasing it. We already see the demographic changing.
    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...