Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Am I being really naiive (?) but I thought that weaning was supposed to help babies sleep through the night by filling up their tummies so they don't get so hungry at night? The total opposite seems to have happened with us - until we started weaning my nearly-7-month-old 3 weeks ago he used to sleep through the night from 7pm - 7am, settling himself back to sleep if he did wake in the night. Since we started weaning he's been waking up at least once or twice a night, including really early between 9 and 10pm sometimes, and seems to really struggle to settle himself back down to sleep. I thought at first that he was really hungry so started feeding him more solids (3 meals) in the day but have since scaled down to 2 meals as he didn't seem to be able to keep his milk down, so I thought he was making up for his lack of milk at night.


He's an absolute angel baby during the day - very good at napping and always happy and playful. He never seems to suffer from wind or a sore tummy during the day. So, is this normal and just him getting used to digesting solids? Sleep regression or a developmental phase that I just have to endure? Appreciate it could also be teething (still no actual sign of teeth though) which was what I first thought it was 3 weeks ago but it's been going on for ages now and I want my sleep and evenings back!

It can happen - from memory (and it's been a while since mine were little babies) there's a risk of them cutting down on their milk, and at that age that's where they get the bulk of their nutrition. Try to make sure he's not drastically cutting back on milk and see how you go.


I've never believed that weaning will help sleep, as, particularly in the early months of weaning, the foods are all very low calorie things (fruit, vegetables etc.), so won't fill them up.


Good luck!

I think round this age they tend to have another development leap / wonder week etc. But I loose track of where we are up to, to be honest - it all seems to blend into one thing after another!


Have you introduced protein / complex carbs yet? I found that really helped to keep the little one's tummy fully full, if you see what I mean.


Having said that, all has gone haywire today due to a combination of snot, wind and vast amounts of dribbling which I HOPE might mean this blessed tooth might pop through....

The weaning/sleeping through thing is a bit of an old wives tale and it's just as likely to disturb their sleep. The unaccustomed digestive action can feel a bit odd and rouse them. It will pass though. If he's slept through before, he can do it again.
Hi there, I agree with Gubodge, sometimes the load on their digestive system actually leads to more disturbed sleep. Make sure that you introduce new foods at lunch rather than dinner, and also, as someone else mentioned, make sure he is still getting all his milk, the milk is actually more filling for them than some pureed veg! What a shock to the system though when he was previously such a good sleeper! Good luck

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...