Jump to content

Recommended Posts

in case readers of this forum don't know, there is currently a plannign application in to replace Banfields Wood Yard (Barry Road) with six three storey buildings


http://planningonline.southwarksites.com/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPSESSION=%7B%5B%2A%211B3B37163D3D352B2218373C7977747C796B6A71681C081E01121F00791C2E213B766000142F262B3C7660001429241E23323C2B2D20261C2A343B36302B33621A3D3B34312B152F3D3437310D0A7C7C7F6A63767479647C0B6367727777%21%2A%5D%7D


It would be a shame to loose this useful amenity in East Dulwich and I hope that local people are reveiwing the plannign application

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2027-banfields-wood-yard/
Share on other sites

oh for gods sake I've had a f*cking nuff of all this. Everything that's unique to ED is going in favour of yet more f*cking flats.


The garden centre, the woodyard, the tyre shop.......


yawn......more housing to keep the pointless purchases made on a Saturday afternoon from one of the pointless and soulless shops on LL, safe in.

*Goodbye to the beautiful woodyard. Whenever I have visitors, I always take them past it so that they can marvel at the chicken wire and ramshackle corrugated iron roof.

Ha. I like it.



For heaven's sake. If a man wants to retire and not pass the business on to someone else, and go and live a hopefully peaceful retirement, why begrudge him his chance? Do you think he should hold on to it just so much-needed flats shouldn't be built? I mean, it's hardly the Taj Mahal. Sheesh. Nero

Sorry to say this but...


You cant have the twee little shops selling utter toss / organic butchers / free range museli / exciting delis / gastro pubs / a nice cushion of equity on your property etal without the shadow of further development on every square inch of availiable land - thats how these things go - hand in hand.


It may not be "right" but its the flip side of the coin to the "positive" ( not my positvies I hasten to add ! ) aspects of the area.

I would be very surprised if the timber yard was sold. People have been trying to buy the land for years and years.


If it is sold I really hope they don't build monstrosities like the houses opposite (although they are far better than the run-down petrol station they replaced).

I had the opportunity to buy a site ( actually a brace of sites on opposite sides of the same road. backing ono the rail track ) in SE15 that was "operating" as a wood / reclaim yard some time ago


for an absolute pittance.


would have been difficult to get PP, but as we all know, a few long lunches with some councillors in the area and its amazing how what once seemed impossible, can be resolved.


I didnt, but am glad to say it was sold and is working once a gain as a proper profitable reclaim yard & not the site of some nasty flats.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know, MadWorld, I know.

> Goodbye to the beautiful woodyard. Whenever I have

> visitors, I always take them past it so that they

> can marvel at the chicken wire and ramshackle

> corrugated iron roof.


ROFL

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's the milquetoast triangulation that's delivered so much electoral success to the Lib Dems locally and nationally! 🤣
    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...