Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the-e-dealer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well then it WAS partly their fault they should

> > have kicked someone incompetent out NOT

> encouraged

> > you to keep them on.

>

> Yes, but would it have made good television?


xxxxxxx


Actually they didn't cover the problems with DJKQ at all because it wasn't that kind of programme.


She appeared extremely briefly in one part of it (IIRC) demonstrating how to put paint on a wall :))


I thought that was quite funny because her painting technique was idiosyncratic to say the least, she didn't seem to have heard of cutting in.

>

> .

> .

> .

>

> Sent by Osmosis.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does this thread make anyone else slightly

> uncomfortable?



Mmm..... I am a little surprised the site allows such an undefended diatribe against a trader - but then again I guess nobody has named the individual/company.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does this thread make anyone else slightly

> uncomfortable?


I think probably (despite having, umm, egged it on a leetle - not that Sue needed much encouragement) my opinion is now that it (the thread) ought to go - at least until the other party makes an appearance.


As another sagely poster (not connected with DJKQ) has pointed out.. there may be other, well, issues which I don't think most amused bystanders (including myself) on here would want to exacerbate, were they to be the case.


That might be a load of old guff, of course, but maybe better safe than sorry on this one?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> my opinion is now that it (the thread) ought to go

> - at least until the other party makes an

> appearance.


xxxxxxxxx


Well the other party is conspicuous by their absence, despite having posted on their football thread relatively recently.


Perhaps in due course the OP may expand further on their experience of the trader in question.


All I would say is, there are always two sides to every issue. Which is why I said that I would abide by the decision of an independent objective mediator. DJKQ refused mediation. Why?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You can get a card at the till, though, to get the discount. You don't have to carry it with you (or load it onto your phone), you can just get a different card each time. Not sure what happens if they notice 🤣
    • Yes..that may be the case but membership STARTING at £115 a month is still unafforable for many. Council gyms also have a large range of equipment and I had a  PT at Dulwich leisure centre when I was in Full Time employment who was incredible and even kept in contact during lockdown giving me a program I could do at home and checking in weekly at no charge or personal gain for herself. I dont doubt that Fit For may be a good gym (Its been in situ long enough so must be doing something right) However the cost of membership means it is affordable for the few not the many. If I could afford that kind of fee I would rather get a train to Canary Wharf and go to Virgin active where theres a pool and incredible classes and facilities 
    • This sounds great 👍 
    • We found a red TREK bike yesterday that had clearly been stolen and dumped. Would love to reunite it with its owner. Get in touch if you know whose it is.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...