Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the-e-dealer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well then it WAS partly their fault they should

> > have kicked someone incompetent out NOT

> encouraged

> > you to keep them on.

>

> Yes, but would it have made good television?


xxxxxxx


Actually they didn't cover the problems with DJKQ at all because it wasn't that kind of programme.


She appeared extremely briefly in one part of it (IIRC) demonstrating how to put paint on a wall :))


I thought that was quite funny because her painting technique was idiosyncratic to say the least, she didn't seem to have heard of cutting in.

>

> .

> .

> .

>

> Sent by Osmosis.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does this thread make anyone else slightly

> uncomfortable?



Mmm..... I am a little surprised the site allows such an undefended diatribe against a trader - but then again I guess nobody has named the individual/company.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does this thread make anyone else slightly

> uncomfortable?


I think probably (despite having, umm, egged it on a leetle - not that Sue needed much encouragement) my opinion is now that it (the thread) ought to go - at least until the other party makes an appearance.


As another sagely poster (not connected with DJKQ) has pointed out.. there may be other, well, issues which I don't think most amused bystanders (including myself) on here would want to exacerbate, were they to be the case.


That might be a load of old guff, of course, but maybe better safe than sorry on this one?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> my opinion is now that it (the thread) ought to go

> - at least until the other party makes an

> appearance.


xxxxxxxxx


Well the other party is conspicuous by their absence, despite having posted on their football thread relatively recently.


Perhaps in due course the OP may expand further on their experience of the trader in question.


All I would say is, there are always two sides to every issue. Which is why I said that I would abide by the decision of an independent objective mediator. DJKQ refused mediation. Why?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just saw on the bbc london news at 6.30 tonight, that there is a Christmas tree rental scheme in the Dulwich area where you rent a potted tree and return it after Christmas.  Great idea, anyone know where it is? 
    • The Chadwick Road railway bridge is also sheet ice. Watched 3 hire bike's lose it and come off and one car which ended up on the pavement. The bikes seemed very surprised when it happened although you could see the ice.
    • Happy New Year! And to start off the new year another festive feast of football.  Week 18 fixtures...   Saturday 3rd January Aston Villa v Nottingham Forest Brighton & Hove Albion v Burnley Wolverhampton Wanderers v West Ham United AFC Bournemouth v Arsenal   Sunday 4th January Leeds United v Manchester United Everton v Brentford Fulham v Liverpool Newcastle United v Crystal Palace Tottenham Hotspur v Sunderland Manchester City v Chelsea   Tuesday 6th January West Ham United v Nottingham Forest   Wednesday 7th January AFC Bournemouth v Tottenham Hotspur Brentford v Sunderland Crystal Palace v Aston Villa Everton v Wolverhampton Wanderers Fulham v Chelsea Manchester City v Brighton & Hove Albion Burnley v Manchester United Newcastle United v Leeds United   Thursday 8th January Arsenal v Liverpool
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...