Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the-e-dealer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well then it WAS partly their fault they should

> > have kicked someone incompetent out NOT

> encouraged

> > you to keep them on.

>

> Yes, but would it have made good television?


xxxxxxx


Actually they didn't cover the problems with DJKQ at all because it wasn't that kind of programme.


She appeared extremely briefly in one part of it (IIRC) demonstrating how to put paint on a wall :))


I thought that was quite funny because her painting technique was idiosyncratic to say the least, she didn't seem to have heard of cutting in.

>

> .

> .

> .

>

> Sent by Osmosis.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does this thread make anyone else slightly

> uncomfortable?



Mmm..... I am a little surprised the site allows such an undefended diatribe against a trader - but then again I guess nobody has named the individual/company.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does this thread make anyone else slightly

> uncomfortable?


I think probably (despite having, umm, egged it on a leetle - not that Sue needed much encouragement) my opinion is now that it (the thread) ought to go - at least until the other party makes an appearance.


As another sagely poster (not connected with DJKQ) has pointed out.. there may be other, well, issues which I don't think most amused bystanders (including myself) on here would want to exacerbate, were they to be the case.


That might be a load of old guff, of course, but maybe better safe than sorry on this one?

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> my opinion is now that it (the thread) ought to go

> - at least until the other party makes an

> appearance.


xxxxxxxxx


Well the other party is conspicuous by their absence, despite having posted on their football thread relatively recently.


Perhaps in due course the OP may expand further on their experience of the trader in question.


All I would say is, there are always two sides to every issue. Which is why I said that I would abide by the decision of an independent objective mediator. DJKQ refused mediation. Why?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You might be interested in watching this video on you tube. It's from a wildlife gardener called Joel Ashton who regularly posts about his work in that area. Being interested in that kind of thing I follow him a lot. Anyway, a few days ago he posted about his plants being deliberately poisoned allegedly by his neighbour. He is going through the process of taking legal action and videoing this journey. There is another follow up which he posted a couple of days ago . It might be helpful to you. I think I should point out that the alleged culprit is not identified on the video so not breaking any privacy laws in sharing this.  
    • Around ten days ago there were around 6 Mallard ducklings and the same number of Canada Goose goslings. Today, not one to be seen 😥
    • Looking to buy a second hand iPhone! Ideally a 14 or younger. Decent storage 
    • Just wanted to recommend Aria from AFE Plumbing. Arrived exactly on time, good communication and fixed my kitchen tap as requested. V friendly and helpful. Tel:07739 734895
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...