Jump to content

Things taht in all honesty you're not that bothered about...


Recommended Posts

Re: Things taht in all honesty you're not that bothered about...


All of the comments belo.......


Facebook.

Twitter.

Any social media, blog etc.

The enviroment - we're never going to make any difference to what happens, it's just too @#$%& up.

The olympics.

Apple.

The French.

Politics.


Oh, a list, good thinking. In that case...

iphone

macs

ipads

apple

xfactor


1.Which Mobile Phone.

2. Saggy Trousers

3. Visible Underwear

4. Football

5. Rugby

6. Kerry Catatonic

7. Simon Foul

8. X factor

9. Jordennnn

10. I Pods

11. Anything From Apple

12. Im A failed Celebrity shoot me

13. Bog Brother.


--------------------

Sent from a computer


britain's got no talent

lady gaga

facebook etc


...there is so much more but I've forgotten, probably because I'm not that bothered about them


ETA: also, they do all cause me to have irrational rage

Gordon Bennet Ramsay.


--------------------

Sent from a computer


There's another Thread for that.


--------------------

Sent from a computer



I couldn't even be bothered to add the final w


NETTE:-S

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> people have corrupted this thread - it's now

> things that REALLY bother me, or cause me

> irrational rage



Correct SJ. It's not meant to be about things you hate


a couple more....


Pot - the dullest drug in the world, bar none..... and gives you cancer

Cars - good shout MrB, never not gonna have one but I actually don't care/know about them

I agree with Otto and SJ about football. Perhaps it's because there is too much of it on TV, and of what I do watch, too much of that is boring. Having said that,I'm working at a football club at the moment and I just love the stadium. Football stadia are to me what churches might be to some people.

Gervais' thinness is not visibly apparent - for me, he comes under the irrational rage thread.


But toner - nah, can't be bothered. Does anyone know the point of it?


(as in cleanse, tone, moisturise the skin... probably quite useful stuff in photocopiers)

Isn't toner supposed to tighten the skin ( ha-if only)


Jeez i'd bathe in it if it did.


Oh and more topically. So,George Osborne's had voice coaching has he.


Ask for a refund if I were him, his 'speeeeeetch' (i'm pinching my nose here) get me all asthmatic.


In short, i'm not taht (sic) bothered about the economy. Much like Moos isn't that bothered about Christmas lunch;-)


*cries into cornflakes*




NETTE:X

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh you beeeech.

>

> Actually, I'm having a dry run of Mr. Sparkes'

> best rib of beef this weekend, and though I've

> missed Stir-up Sunday will be attempting making a

> Christmas pud.

>

> So ner.


The library service happily receive left overs....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sophie, I have to thank you for bringing me squarely into 2025.  I was aware of 4G/5G USB dongles for single computers, and of being able to use smartphones for tethering 4G/5G, but hadn't realised that the four mobile networks were now providing home hub/routers, effectively mimicking the cabled broadband suppliers.  I'd personally stick to calling the mobile networks 4G/5G rather than wifi, so as not to confuse them with the wifi that we use within home or from external wifi hotspots. 4G/5G is a whole diffferent, wide-area set of  networks, and uses its own distinct wavebands. So, when you're saying wi-fi, I assume you're actually referring to the wide-area networks, and that it's not a matter of just having poor connections within your home local area network, or a router which is deficient.   If any doubt, the best test will be with a computer connected directly to the router by cable; possibly  trying different locations as well. Which really leaves me with only one maybe useful thing to say.  :) The Which pages at https://www.which.co.uk/reviews/broadband/article/what-is-broadband/what-is-4g-broadband-aUWwk1O9J0cW look pretty useful and informative. They include local area quality of coverage maps for the four providers (including 5G user reports I think) , where they say (and I guess it too is pretty common knowledge): Our survey of the best and worst UK mobile networks found that the most common issues mobile customers have are constantly poor phone signal and continuous brief network dropouts – and in fact no network in our survey received a five star rating for network reliability. 
    • 5G has a shorter range and is worse at penetrating obstacles between you and the cell tower, try logging into the router and knocking it back to 4G (LTE) You also need to establish if the problem is WiFi or cellular. Change the WiFi from 5GHz to 2.4GHz and you will get better WiFi coverage within your house If your WiFi is fine and moving to 4G doesn't help then you might be in a dead spot. There's lots of fibre deployed in East Dulwich
    • Weve used EE for the past 6 years. We're next to Peckham Rye. It's consistent and we've never had any outages or technical issues. We watch live streams for football and suffer no lags or buffering.   All the best.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...