Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So?

>

> Are you saying that they've never offended anyone?

> And should people who post racist insults online

> have their kids put into care upon having their

> identity revealed?



Expect a call from the social services at any moment, they are concerned about you.

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I didn't inquire upon the guest list, they

> enthusiastically brought it up repeatedly

> throughout the evening. They were incredibly

> peculiar parents, on various fronts.


Bizarre


A children's birthday party in the evening.


Never in 11 years as a parent, has either of my children been to a children's birthday party in the evening.


Never.


Maybe we lead sheltered lives.



NETTE:-S

This awful woman seems to have started a trend, and at least two more persons have been captured in full poisonous rant mode and have been posted on youtube. The worrying thing is that those sitting or standing by these "people" chose to say next to nothing, and not one appears to call the Police to report these vile excuses for human beings. Have we really become so apathetic?

When I watched the video, I didn't see a woman who was drunk or high on anything......it looked to me as though some kind of row had started for whatever reason (with another passenger) and the woman turned to the most extreme form of insult she could think of (racial abuse). That in no way condones what she said of course but we see that all the time.....someone gets into a row, loses their temper and then says things that are meant to hurt.


We don't see from the video how the incident started for example. I suspect it wasn't some ad hoc random rant but precipitated by something between the two passengers. That doesn't excuse, but also doesn't say to me that she should have her child taken away either. If we removed the child from every parent that expresses an unpalatable view then we'd have a bigger crisis of children in care than we already do.

> This awful woman seems to have started a trend

> It's a worrying trend.


The only observable trend is of newpapers all flogging the same story, messageboarders following it, and subsequent buttons being pressed ad lib.


And even that's not really a trend, it happens all the time. I think there are some boards that can more or less subsist on posting the day's Daily Mail story URLs as thread starters.

Sorry I can't have a parent being allowed to have custody of a child after launching into to a rant especially when this person is obviously drunk, medicated or both. Apart from her noxious views she puts herself, and her child at risk. Responsible parenting?

> Sorry I can't have a parent being allowed to have custody of a child after launching into to a rant especially when

> this person is obviously drunk, medicated or both. Apart from her noxious views she puts herself, and her child at risk.

> Responsible parenting?


Hanging is too good for her. Take her down. Next YouTube clip please.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Sorry I can't have a parent being allowed to

> have custody of a child after launching into to a

> rant especially when

> > this person is obviously drunk, medicated or

> both. Apart from her noxious views she puts

> herself, and her child at risk.

> > Responsible parenting?

>

> Hanging is too good for her. Take her down. Next

> YouTube clip please.



So you think she's a responsible, fit and proper person to bring up a child do you? Next social worker applicant please.

Parkdrive Wrote:


> So you think she's a responsible, fit and proper person to bring up a child do you? Next social worker applicant please.


I think nothing about her. I know next to nothing about her. I have not seen the video. I would not dare to make anything but the most provisional and inconsequential of judgements of her even if I had watched it. I am glad that any authorities entrusted to make any significant decisions about her or her children will do so only after consideration of all available evidence and of all possible courses of action, and that any decisions about children will have their overall well-being as the main concern.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

>

> > So you think she's a responsible, fit and proper

> person to bring up a child do you? Next social

> worker applicant please.

>

> I think nothing about her. I know next to nothing

> about her. I have not seen the video. I would

> not dare to make anything but the most provisional

> and inconsequential of judgements of her even if I

> had watched it. I am glad that any authorities

> entrusted to make any significant decisions about

> her or her children will do so only after

> consideration of all available evidence and of all

> possible courses of action, and that any decisions

> about children will have their overall well-being

> as the main concern.


You mean like they did in the case of Baby P? A lot of words for someone who thinks "nothing" of this person.

Parkdrive: "Sorry I can't have a parent being allowed to have custody of a child after launching into to a rant especially when this person is obviously drunk, medicated or both".


And what would you like to do with the 10's of thousands of children you've just removed from their ("drunk, medicated or both") parents ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Two local ‘High Streets for People’ events happening today: - Southwark celebrates High Streets for People On Saturday 21 June, Southwark Council is bringing residents, families, communities and businesses together to celebrate our High Streets. On Bellenden Road, Peckham, there will be a community event from 11am to 4pm with children’s games, face-painting, live music including a samba band and DJs, food from local businesses, cycling activities and much more. The road will be temporarily shut to vehicles between Danby Street and Choumert Road from 7am to 7pm, with buses diverted during this time to make space for community and family activities. Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets and Waste, said: “What a great way to celebrate the first day of Summer! Streets for People is about putting people first — making our neighbourhoods places where communities can connect, businesses can thrive, and everyone can enjoy cleaner air and safer streets.” Partners in the event include Bellenden Road businesses, London Play, Peddle my Wheels, JoyRiders, Community Cycleworks, the London Samba Band, OurBike, Poetic Unity. North Cross Road market will also be extended on Saturday 21 June, with extra traders taking part. Vehicle access will be restricted up to Lacon Road between 8am and 5pm to accommodate this. Local communities are also organising a number of play streets and street parties to mark the start of summer. The council has approved 18 road closures in June and July, allowing communities to enjoy their streets without traffic for the day. All these activities support Southwark’s Streets for People strategy, which seeks to make streets across the borough cleaner, greener, safer and more welcoming.  Investments are being made in walking and cycling routes, improved air quality, and creating more space for community use. Find out more at www.southwark.gov.uk/highstreetsforpeople As part of its commitment to do something each year that brings residents, community groups and businesses together to take climate action, Southwark Council has also arranged a number of free events as part of London Climate Action Week. You can view the full list of events at www.southwark.gov.uk/climate-week
    • It does seem a common business strategy these days. River Island has just announced a similar restructuring: closing 33 shops and demanding that the landlords of a further 71 locations take a haircut. 
    • If anyone has any spare tickets for Crystal Palace on Sunday let me know!
    • The tenant's business has already failed. If the landlord doesn't accept it, they can have a vacant property, stand in the queue of creditors, and get paid little or nothing. It's a gamble that the restructuring will work and the tenant will start paying rent again. Commercial properties are often hard to let. 🤷
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...