Jump to content

Racist Bigot spouting bile on tram


Parkdrive

Recommended Posts

It was a diagnosis 'Claudia' not an insult.


'Mental retardation is a generalized disorder appearing before adulthood, characterized by significantly impaired cognitive functioning and deficits in two or more adaptive behaviors. Once focused almost entirely on cognition, the definition now includes both a component relating to mental functioning and one relating to individuals' functional skills in their environment.'


Please feel free to explain what part of that definition doesn't apply to your views 'Claudia'?


You fabricate without foundation wildly speculative scenarios to reposition the 'white woman' as the oppressed individual in this encounter, and conjure up one dimensional interpretations of international incidents to back up your prejudice.


I think "impaired cognitive functioning" just about covers that.


You imagine that an unforgivablly abusive offensive aggressive and racist verbal assault signals the right moment to air this grievance. "Deficits in two or more adaptive behaviors" just about covers that.


Your pretended hurt feelings are a thin veneer on your motivation 'Claudia', it's shameful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm simply trying to achieve some balance. I'm

> also appalled at the media's witchhunt of this

> woman. And although I share in her exarsperation,

> to a degree, she put her child at risk by saying

> what she said, where she said it. Because from

> where I'm sitting it looked as though the young

> man behind her was about to assault her.

>

> And yes, she was clearly drunk or high. I suspect

> the former.


Why do you say that it looked like the man behind her was about to assault her? How do you know he wasn't just going to confront her? I think it's wrong for you to judge him and assume he was going to do her any physical harm!


Her attitude was absolutely disgutsing and to speak like that infront of her own child was shocking. Just goes to show by his response that he is used to hearing that kind of language!


I am surprised she was allowed to rant for so long before being asked to shut up, there was children on the tram ffs! I think the tram driver should have stopped the tram and kicked her off. I don't think she was drunk or high just ignorant!


And Claudia I think you're wrong in saying that if it had been the otherway round that less of a fuss would have been made. It would't have been acceptable either and just as many people black and white would have been disgusted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're a cowardly, obnoxious liar who's uncomfortable with an opposing opinion


Where have I "fabricated without foundation wildly speculative scenarios to reposition the 'white woman' as the oppressed individual in this encounter", 'Huguenot'.


Do you condone the undeniably racist organisation I've linked previously?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't feel in the least discomforted by your opinion 'Claudia'. I'm disgusted by it.


You've invented scenarios where offensive white women on trams are on the verge of being attacked.


You've deliberately misquoted claims of anti-white immigration strategies to whip up racial prejudice.


You've now presented a reasonable and universally welcomed association designed to ensure equitable and even tratement for all with the pejorative term 'an undeniably racist organisation'.


Far from my own discomofort, I suspect your increasingly aggressive tone underlines an essentially weak and skulking personality who uses racism as a crutch for a fragile ego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More lies. Seriously, unless you're doing this for your own ammusement, where have I invented scenarios where offensive white women are on the verge of being attacked on a tram?


And how does the National Black Police Association "ensure equitable and even tratement for all"? It doesn't. It's specifically designed to discriminate by furthering the interests of black policemen and women only. It's racist, and you're intolerably stupid for overlooking that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Claudia', here's where you 'invented scenarios where offensive white women are on the verge of being attacked on a tram':


"I'm simply trying to achieve some balance. I'm also appalled at the media's witchhunt of this woman. And although I share in her exarsperation, to a degree, she put her child at risk by saying what she said, where she said it. Because from where I'm sitting it looked as though the young man behind her was about to assault her."


Can you not remember what you said? Do you remember you wrote it down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm surprised no-one has helped you.  There have been at least two or three threads on the topic in the last couple of years. I'm afraid they'll all confirm that you assumed wrongly.  I remember looking into it myself and finding nothing to assist anyone who made the same assumption. While recently having a look through the Townley Road appeals decided in 2023, I came across this determination that also clearly spells it out. 31/3/23 Reasons     Mr X appeals against two Penalty Charge Notices. He argues that they have only been issued in order to make money for the council. Mr X states that the restrictions were introduced to make it safe for school students in the morning and afternoon and that as both 26th December 2022 and 2nd January 2023 were public holidays there was no purpose in enforcing the restriction. The appellant states that he was driving to collect an elderly relative. Townley Road is a route that is for buses, cycles and taxis only Monday to Friday 8-9am and 3-4.30pm. The restriction is in operation every Monday to Friday whether or not schools are on holiday or if it is a bank or public holiday. There was no indication on the sign that the prohibition was not being enforced on either Monday 26th December or Monday 2nd January. I have seen the CCTV footage in relation to each contravention. I have also  seen photographs of the signs and camera car footage that show the signs  and warning signs. I find that the signs are clear and that there is sufficient  warning of the restriction to enable a driver to take an alternative route. I find that each contravention occurred. I refuse both appeals.
    • I suggest you write to the estate agent asking specific questions and request a written response. Otherwise they will tell you anything to get a sale.
    • Hello, I walked past this a few minutes ago on the corner of Shawbury Road X Lordship Lane. Had a look, put it back but then saw the cut security chain as well 20 meter down the road and thought someone definitely is missing at least some handlebars. If they are still there when I come back I can take them in as I live on the next street, please DM me to arrange pickup if they belong to you.   --- UPDATE: 20:02 PM, it's still there.   I've decided not to touch it again or take it with me as it's oily and the wife will not appreciate it.
    • There is a lovely children's cafe near Peckham Park  Also there's a art place which does kids art classes etc near East Dulwich Station 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...