Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So?

>

> Are you saying that they've never offended anyone?

> And should people who post racist insults online

> have their kids put into care upon having their

> identity revealed?



Expect a call from the social services at any moment, they are concerned about you.

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I didn't inquire upon the guest list, they

> enthusiastically brought it up repeatedly

> throughout the evening. They were incredibly

> peculiar parents, on various fronts.


Bizarre


A children's birthday party in the evening.


Never in 11 years as a parent, has either of my children been to a children's birthday party in the evening.


Never.


Maybe we lead sheltered lives.



NETTE:-S

This awful woman seems to have started a trend, and at least two more persons have been captured in full poisonous rant mode and have been posted on youtube. The worrying thing is that those sitting or standing by these "people" chose to say next to nothing, and not one appears to call the Police to report these vile excuses for human beings. Have we really become so apathetic?

When I watched the video, I didn't see a woman who was drunk or high on anything......it looked to me as though some kind of row had started for whatever reason (with another passenger) and the woman turned to the most extreme form of insult she could think of (racial abuse). That in no way condones what she said of course but we see that all the time.....someone gets into a row, loses their temper and then says things that are meant to hurt.


We don't see from the video how the incident started for example. I suspect it wasn't some ad hoc random rant but precipitated by something between the two passengers. That doesn't excuse, but also doesn't say to me that she should have her child taken away either. If we removed the child from every parent that expresses an unpalatable view then we'd have a bigger crisis of children in care than we already do.

> This awful woman seems to have started a trend

> It's a worrying trend.


The only observable trend is of newpapers all flogging the same story, messageboarders following it, and subsequent buttons being pressed ad lib.


And even that's not really a trend, it happens all the time. I think there are some boards that can more or less subsist on posting the day's Daily Mail story URLs as thread starters.

Sorry I can't have a parent being allowed to have custody of a child after launching into to a rant especially when this person is obviously drunk, medicated or both. Apart from her noxious views she puts herself, and her child at risk. Responsible parenting?

> Sorry I can't have a parent being allowed to have custody of a child after launching into to a rant especially when

> this person is obviously drunk, medicated or both. Apart from her noxious views she puts herself, and her child at risk.

> Responsible parenting?


Hanging is too good for her. Take her down. Next YouTube clip please.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Sorry I can't have a parent being allowed to

> have custody of a child after launching into to a

> rant especially when

> > this person is obviously drunk, medicated or

> both. Apart from her noxious views she puts

> herself, and her child at risk.

> > Responsible parenting?

>

> Hanging is too good for her. Take her down. Next

> YouTube clip please.



So you think she's a responsible, fit and proper person to bring up a child do you? Next social worker applicant please.

Parkdrive Wrote:


> So you think she's a responsible, fit and proper person to bring up a child do you? Next social worker applicant please.


I think nothing about her. I know next to nothing about her. I have not seen the video. I would not dare to make anything but the most provisional and inconsequential of judgements of her even if I had watched it. I am glad that any authorities entrusted to make any significant decisions about her or her children will do so only after consideration of all available evidence and of all possible courses of action, and that any decisions about children will have their overall well-being as the main concern.

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

>

> > So you think she's a responsible, fit and proper

> person to bring up a child do you? Next social

> worker applicant please.

>

> I think nothing about her. I know next to nothing

> about her. I have not seen the video. I would

> not dare to make anything but the most provisional

> and inconsequential of judgements of her even if I

> had watched it. I am glad that any authorities

> entrusted to make any significant decisions about

> her or her children will do so only after

> consideration of all available evidence and of all

> possible courses of action, and that any decisions

> about children will have their overall well-being

> as the main concern.


You mean like they did in the case of Baby P? A lot of words for someone who thinks "nothing" of this person.

Parkdrive: "Sorry I can't have a parent being allowed to have custody of a child after launching into to a rant especially when this person is obviously drunk, medicated or both".


And what would you like to do with the 10's of thousands of children you've just removed from their ("drunk, medicated or both") parents ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...