Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am just wondering what everyone's view is on this. Personally, having recently observed it (on TV) at various stadia (or should that be stadiums?) following the very tragic death of Gary Speed, I actually quite like it. At a stadium anyway, it strikes me as more fitting than the minute's silence. Having said this, I am not so sure how appropriate applause might be, for example, at the Cenotaph.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/20817-the-minutes-applause/
Share on other sites

WW1 2 Minutes Silence


The silence represents the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month in 1918,

when the guns of Europe fell silent.


This silence is marked by the firing of a field gun on Horse Guards Parade to begin and end the silence.


The Silence gives us all a moment to relect on lost commrades and lost family members and is a sign of respect.


I feel that a Minutes Silence should be just that.


Every Individual being able to privately show their Respect and Reflect on there memories of anyone passed on.


Refs Whistle to start and end the Silence


Loud Applause should be used to Break that silence. That would be a nice touch.


Just my view


Fox

Actually most artists and orchestras receive far more than a minutes applause. Conductor usually leaves and reenters the stage at least three times, and then takes time to acknowledge some individual members of the orchestra. When you're sat on stage it's time mostly spent either grinning inanely, patting your colleagues on their back or planning the quickest way to pack up, change and hit the bar before the queue gets big! Best reward after a concert though comes in certain parts of Germany where you are handed a beer as you exit the stage...
And during Funerals when I always have a minute's silence so those with faith can say a silent prayer in their own time, I am often completely overwhelemed when - at the end - there is sometimes and completely unpredictably an applause for the joy given by the life of the person who has died. The length of applause usually relates to how many people are there and the age of the deceased.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...