Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Abject. Five hundred and lots plays a brace of 200s.


Still think England can nick one of the next two, though. They will, if they've got any sense, go back to six batsmen, keeper, and four bowlers. I'd like Jones to play instead of Broad. Wouldn't even mind Harmison back in - yes, it's that desparate.


Side for Edgbaston: Cook, Strauss, Bell, Pieterson, Vaughan, Collingwood/ Shah, Flintoff, Ambrose, Jones, Panesar, Harmison/ Sidebottom.

Ambrose? Still? Nah, I'd be chucking him if I were a selector. What about Phil Mustard? Avergaes 23 in ODIs and 26 in county matches. He's got to be better than Ambrose, surely?


So I'd have Cook; Strauss; Vaughan©; Bell; Pieterson; Mustard(wc); Flintoff; Broad; Anderson; Jones; Panesar


I'm still not sure about bringing Colly back in but he had a good knock for Durham at the weekend.

What does Broad do in that team? He seems incapable of taking wickets - there only to store up an end for a while. Might as well play the proper extra batsmen until Broad has developed a bit more bowling threat.


Number six is a key position in test cricket and you have to have a proper batter there.


The keeper could be any keeper from Foster, Mustard, Davies, Scott, Ambrose etc. I'm not fussed - but none of the candidates is a test match six.

For my money Broad offers a good all rounder. He's developing nicely with the bat and although not a deadly bowler offers a good alternative at one end with either Flintoff or Anderson at the other.


Why is no6 "key" compared to 5 or 7? Foster might be a good bet. Was assured a few years ago until he broke his arm and has never got back. First class average is decent too.


You've only got 3 fast bowlers (flintoff, jones and harmy/sidey) - all three of whom aren't at full fitness or match-readiness - not wise imo.

Number six is not any more key than five or seven, I just meant it's a proper, full-on batting position - not one you can chuck a 'keeper averaging 30 in first class cricket (as just about all the available candidates do) into as a best effort approach.


Flintoff has just bowed 40 overs. If Sidey is fit he can bowl lots too - as can Jimmy if he is retained. Colly and Pieterson could mop up 15 overs a day between them, easy. But Jones is a wicket taker who does something different.


Broad is developing, just that. Developing. I like him and think he has a big future but he is being milked by the Saf batsmen right now and they need jolting out of their comfort zones.

Maybe we move Flintoff up to 6 then, as you suggest, and move whichever w'keeper we play to 7. But it shouldn't be Ambrose. He's been dreadful.


Maybe Flintoff has bowled 40 overs but he looked pooped at the end and became ineffective. If Sidebottom is fit is a big if - to come straight back and bowl 40 overs is a big ask. You'd dropped Anderson from your team for some reason. Jones should definitely come back - agreed. Not keen on Colly or Pieterson bowling on these pitches - always reeks of desperation to my mind.


I'd be prepared to replace Broad with Sidebottom, perhaps, but his contribution with the bat has been worth his average bowling display.


Shut-it Bren - this is the only fun we're going to be having until the next match! Enjoy it whilst you can mate.

90 overs in a day, David. 4 x 20 plus 10 fiddled from a fifth bowler. It's a fairly normal sort of equation.


The four would be Flintoff, Anderson, Panesar Jones. You're right, I forgot Jimmy, who deserves to stay for now.


Five full bowlers is great if, a) your batting can carry it (England's can't) and b) it actually offers some variety (Broad, Pattinson, Anderson does not).


None of it matters, though, if three of your top five batsmen play like tarts.

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> None of it matters, though, if three of your top

> five batsmen play like tarts.


On this, I think, we are in unanimous agreement. When do we start asking serious questions about Vaughan? Could we relieve him of his captaincy and hope the batting improves? Who replaces him? And his captaining duties are the only bits he does well. Field placings etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The lack of affordable housing is down to Thatcher's promoting sale of council properties. When I was working, I had to deal with many families/older folk/ disabled folk in inferior housing. The worst ones were ex council properties purchased by their tenants  with a very high discount who then sold on for a profit. The new owners frequently rented out at exorbitant prices and failed to maintain the properties. I remember a gentleman who needed to be visited by a district nurse daily becoming very upset as he rented a room in an ex council flat and shared kitchen and bathroom with 6 other people  (it was a 3 bed flat) the landlord did not allow visitors to the flat and this gut was frightened he would be evicted if the nurse visited daily. Unfortunately, the guy was re admitted to hospital and ended up in a care home as he could not receive medical help at home.   Private developers  are not keen on providing a larger percentage of 'social housing' as it dents their profits. Also a social rent is still around £200 plus a week
    • Hello, I was wondering if others have had experience of roof repairs and guarantees. A while back, we had a water leak come through in our top floor room.  A roofer came and went out on the roof to take a look - they said it was to do with a leak near the chimney.   They did some rendering around the chimney and this cost £1800 plus £750 for scaffolding (so £2,550 total).  They said the work came with a 10 year guarantee. About a year later, there was another leak on the same wall, which looked exactly the same size and colour as the previous leak. But it was about 2 metres away from it, on the other side of a window.  I contacted the roofer about this new leak, thinking it would be covered by the guarantee. However, he said the new leak was due to a different and unrelated problem, and so was not covered by the guarantee. This new leak, he said, was due to holes in the felt underneath the tiles. He said there are holes in the felt all over the roof (so if this was the cause, I expect the first leak may have been caused by that too - but he didn't mention the holes in the felt for the first repair). It feels like the 10-year guarantee doesn't mean much at all.  I realise that the guarantee couldn't cover all future problems with the roof, but where do you draw the line with what's reasonable?  Is it that a leak is only covered if an identical leak happens in exactly the same place?  There were no terms and conditions with the guarantee, which I didn't question at the time.  
    • I always like Redemptions coffee though I've not visted for awhile..Romeo Jones was always my 1st choice for takeout Coffee Redemption 2nd. What IS with all these independent Yoga and Pilates Studios? Theres one on London Rd in Forest Hill (Mind) thats recently opened and then theres the Pilates place thats opened on North X Road. I looked at the prices of the one on NorthX road and was frankly shocked at how expensive it is, The FH one is slightly less.  Made me decide to stick with classes in The local authority gym
    • Dulwich Village update: The old DVillage location is (again?) under offer. The storefront next to the new grocer is going to open as a yoga and pilates studio...the name of which I've forgotten. 🤦‍♂️  Megan's is starting to push its takeaway coffee and cannibalise some of Redemption Coffee's market share. Is Megan's struggling? It's quite a big restaurant they have and rent cant be cheap. The reinventing of the Megan's branch on Lordship Lane as Ollie's seems to have stalled. And Redemption is looking a bit tired these days...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...