Jump to content

Recommended Posts

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------The only one of a few intelligent replies on this thread that has given a mature answer.

> Tarot Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think there is too much chillie in all

> products now ...

>

> You may be right in the sense that chilli is

> probably more common than most people realise.

>

> Many supermarket ready cooked or pre-prepared

> meals include chilli (i.e. cayenne pepper), often

> indirectly as part of a seasoning (e.g.

> Worcestershire sauce - so not listed as an

> ingredient), or the milder bell peppers, which are

> used as cheap, colourful bulking agents.

>

> It probably makes commercial sense: the

> capsaicinoids, the active ingredients and sources

> of peppery heat, are addictive.

What I find so interesting about this is the sense that something has changed and yet I remember that back in the 60s just about every meat stew, shepherds pie etc had Worcestershire sauce in it. Cheese on toast never went without a splash. My mother went through bottles of the stuff. And she was a very traditional English cook. Now, it's a far less common condiment to find in a kitchen cupboard. I have some but just noticed the date on it (Binned!)


It is very true that sweet (bell) peppers are much more common today - I don't ever remember seeing them as a child, but they shouldn't be any sort of irritant.

Tut,tut you really have a downer on Tarot..Has he upset you Annette?touched a nerve somewhere?.

I agree with him that some food is too spicy being sold in mainstream

Supermarkets.Packets should be more clearly marked with the active ingredients

which might cause a bad reaction for some sentive digestive systems.

Captain Scarlet Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> .....I agree with him that some food is too spicy being

> sold in mainstream

> Supermarkets....

Couldn't disagree more. Supermarket ready meals are generally uber bland so they suit the masses. On the rare occasions I buy them I have to add several spices to make them remotely edible.


Pretty much all meals in supermarkets have the ingredients listed, but I think they could make the text bigger for those with eyesight problems.

Captain Scarlet Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tut,tut you really have a downer on Tarot..Has he

> upset you Annette?touched a nerve somewhere?.

> I agree with him that some food is too spicy being

> sold in mainstream

> Supermarkets.Packets should be more clearly marked

> with the active ingredients

> which might cause a bad reaction for some sentive

> digestive systems.


No not a downer, though I can see her/his stupid bigoted game clear as.


Why, wanna pick a fight or something.



NETTE(?)

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You.ve changed Annette since your Millwall days I

> remember you wasnt so P.C back in the day.

> Not all people are what they appear to be on

> here are they!!.

> You still crack on the same though no change

> there.



No hands up, you're right there Tarot


I mean I DO have a penis.


(though I keep it tucked away safely most of the time)


And being a Gooner through and through, I'm not sure it's me you've met down the Den.


Still either way Tony, have a nice white Christmas.



Nette:)-D

Captain Scarlet Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tut,tut you really have a downer on Tarot..Has he

> upset you Annette?touched a nerve somewhere?.

> I agree with him that some food is too spicy being

> sold in mainstream

> Supermarkets.Packets should be more clearly marked

> with the active ingredients

> which might cause a bad reaction for some sentive

> digestive systems.

-------------------------------------------------------


Re: Consider plain food.

Posted by: Tarot Today, 07:10PM


You.ve changed Annette since your Millwall days I remember you wasnt so P.C back in the day.

Not all people are what they appear to be on here are they!!.

You still crack on the same though no change there.

--------------------------------------------------------------------



I'm not a gambler.


But i'll take a x-mas punt.


If Tarot & Captain Scarlett are not the same person, then i'll eat mine & Santa's hat in the same pie.


3/10



NETTE

anyone implying that spices are a non-English taste is talking nutmegs...


I haven't yet been able to find any reliable sources spice-based medieval or Tudor recipes, but this http://www.pepysdiary.com/p/6902.php points out that Samuel Pepys enjoyed hippocras - which is wine mulled with sugar and spices including cinnamon, ginger, cloves and 'long pepper' - which would probably have both Philip Whoever and his Granny weeping buckets.

and a little more 'old spice'


'Chili peppers, cayenne peppers and paprika -- the latter made from grinding the fruit of the bell pepper -- became very popular once they arrived in England. These peppers were particularly useful as meat was preserved in salt. The spices made from peppers helped mask the excessive saltiness.

Oriental Spices

Explorers brought back ginger, cinnamon, cloves and saffron from the Far East, thus creating the Oriental spice trade. These spices were used to flavor stews and, again, were added generally to disguise the taste of salt.

Typical Meals

Sweet and savory flavors were often combined, as many meat dishes contained cinnamon, nutmeg and ginger. Pies were stuffed with meat that had been mixed with pepper, cloves and mace. Fruits like apples, pears and strawberries were also cooked in cinnamon. Strong flavor combinations were typical'


http://www.ehow.com/info_8470730_elizabethan-spices.html

There is a socio-economic context to this as well - spices, being imported, were of course expensive in England. Pepper was once worth its weight in gold. So spicy food was a taste that could only be indulged by wealthy people.


The poverty of what poor people eat, and the way that cheap spices (and fats and sugars) are used to jazz up rubbish food - now that's a subject for a proper discussion, not the insidious infiltration of foreign muck into 'English food'.

I think Tarot's original point got lost somewhere along the way.

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Food should be palatable does not need to be spicy

> that is the main thing.


I think food should be enjoyable, palatable sounds so......bland. If you don't like heat/spices plump for the plain stuff. If you do, pile it on.

Does not NEED to be spicy no, but when you get the taste for it...


When I first tried a vindaloo many years ago I thought I had been permanently damaged in the taste buds and that anyone who ate it was an idiot, a show-off, a liar or a masochist.


I now love vindaloo and naga and all spicy food - I have been known to put Flying Goose Chilli Sauce on everything from a cheese sandwich to a fish finger (yes, I am a gourmand).


For me this is because when the initial pain of that first vindaloo died away I felt/tasted something wonderful and highly addictive hiding in the background. I have been chasing it ever since.

I don?t think so just because the food is not hot and spicy, does not mean it bland there are so many spices that make food taste nice that is what I was referring to. Coming from a culture where most food as hot spice or peppers is not really a good thing most people I know suffer from high blood pressure which is one of the causes.

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don?t think so just because the food is not hot

> and spicy, does not mean it bland there are so

> many spices that make food taste nice that is what

> I was referring to. Coming from a culture where

> most food as hot spice or peppers is not really a

> good thing most people I know suffer from high

> blood pressure which is one of the causes.


Really? Not sure I concur. Capsaicin is apparently supposed to assist with lowering BP according to some studies. Raised BP would tend to be exacerbated by diets high in fatty/salty foods allegedly - nowt to do with heat/spices.


For goodness sake everyone - there is enough choice in supermarkets to eat bland/spicy/palatable/hot/tasty foods. Eat what suits you and your taste buds. Simples! Jeez.....


Edited to add - some find supermarkets ready meals too spicy, some (me!!) find them horribly bland - which probably means they are about right for the masses. Solution - cook your own meals and add what you darn well like!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...