Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Congratulations to the Black Cherry, officially the Best Bar in East Dulwich 2006 as voted by you, the users of the East Dulwich Forum.


Look out for the trophy in The Black Cherry in a week or so after it's been engraved. Hopefully they'll be overwhelmed and will put it pride of place somewhere prominent.


Thanks to all of you for taking part, there wouldn't have been a result without you. So once again, congratulations to The Black Cherry on Lordship Lane, officially The Best Bar in East Dulwich 2006

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/21-the-best-bar-in-east-dulwich-2006/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

East Dulwich Tavern is unpretentious and eclectic!

Good Music, and good sense of fun!



[Moderator's note] - this post is by a fake person, they have posted five times about the EDT using fake email addresses. Please don't do this as we don't want to bring in mandatory registration to post messages


This message will be removed in a week?s time

***** News Flash - Friday 2nd November ******

Yesterday, as the voting deadline for the presigious Best Bar in East Dulwich gets closer, people were abusing the website with false registrations and fake votes (which have been removed). We have now had to make the poll open to registered users only to ensure fairness. Register here

*****



OK, so just to explain, you now have to be registered to vote because someone decided to get round the system and add lots of votes to the Vale. These votes were swiftly removed, unfortunately during the 30min removal session this evening no votes would have been counted.


I can understand that bars want to win this prestigious award and will go to any lengths to get their hands on it but please play fair.


Only registered users can vote please click here to register and vote for the best bar in East Dulwich


May the best bar win.

  • 2 weeks later...

It's Monday, the poll closes at midnight Wednesday.

Have you voted in the award for the Best Bar in East Dulwich 2006?

It's going to be close. The Black Cherry is currently in the lead with 21% with the Bishop (17%), the EDT (13%) and liquorish (13%) closing in. The rest of the field are still in with a chance but they have some catching up to do.


www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/vote




ok, I know, it's two and a half days left, I just thought I would round it down

  • 14 years later...

I thought antic already had EDT - might have been the very first Antic pub in fact


But Antic did do some weird "split" to do with structure/money and he could have been a victim of that. Or was that the Lodge era (god help us)


Anyone know where he is these days?

holloway Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TGE is alright, staff are quite nice which is

> important. Ray ran a good pub when in charge of

> the EDT, always a cracking atmosphere when big

> football games were on. Think he got badly treated

> when antic took over.



Rumour had it that he left after his version of an incident did not match what was on CCTV.


And the pub was already Antic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...