Jump to content

Empty houses and squating


malumbu

Recommended Posts

Something to take you away from Brexit, although perhaps with the economic decline this may well be related.


A place near us has been empty for years. Signs of renovation but never finished. Never any signs of occupation. Fiscal measures such as increased Council Tax for empty properties don't seem to have any effect. Hardly sitting on a goldmine with prices set to plummet and not the best option to launder money.


Ideal squat if anyone needs some rent-free accommodation, plenty of space for artistic pursuits, anarchic activities and generally talking us back to the time of Thatcher.


Ad will be placed shortly on this web site.


Boooooh


https://www.gov.uk/squatting-law

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is illegal to squat residential properties


So is using antisemitic/Islamaphobic hate speech but you don't let that bother you. You've managed, in your standard bright way, to completely miss the point and the joke of malumbu's post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually there was a serious point to my post that someone has been sitting on an empty house for years whilst there are those out there without a roof over their head. When I moved to the SE there was the remnants of an earlier squatting scene. The BBC 'street' programmme on Camberwell Grove looked back on that too, at a time when Camberwell was on a slippery slope - perhaps the squatters even helped on preventing demolition of the Georgian terraces. I was sadly never 'cool' enough to squat. This bloke was far cooler.


https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/jason-holmes/the-world-according-to-jah-wobble_b_5654351.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There may be active intervention by Southwark council

regarding this empty house, if not there should be. I

suppose it depends if they are aware how long it has been empty. Southwark council have a record of being one of the boroughs with a high number of empty social housing. I have no idea how they manage the private housing,regarding empty houses, although there are laws in place to intervene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malumba, just noticed your op, renovations had begun,

It would be interesting to know if the owners recieved any funding from local council for this. Or how much southwark council fund and follow up in these circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Something to take you away from Brexit, although

> perhaps with the economic decline this may well be

> related.

>

> A place near us has been empty for years. Signs

> of renovation but never finished. Never any signs

> of occupation. Fiscal measures such as increased

> Council Tax for empty properties don't seem to

> have any effect. Hardly sitting on a goldmine

> with prices set to plummet and not the best option

> to launder money.

>

> Ideal squat if anyone needs some rent-free

> accommodation, plenty of space for artistic

> pursuits, anarchic activities and generally

> talking us back to the time of Thatcher.

>

> Ad will be placed shortly on this web site.

>

> Boooooh

>

> https://www.gov.uk/squatting-law


Guardians ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Guardians ?


I think the property guardians thing is a great idea in theory, but I was really surprised to hear how much they charge to live in these places. It's more of an alternative to flat sharing than it is to squatting. And you can be booted out at any point, with only one month's notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody has been sitting on a reasonably sized house for a number of years, with a half assed attempt to renovate. It's not to a high standard so doesn't look like a good investment. It's not in an areas where national and international criminals buy property to launder money. It has probably depreciated. They need to spend money heating it or it will become damp. I expect that there is a premium on the Council Tax. Lewisham (this side of the tracks) doesn't have an empty house problem and main focus is making sure social housing is not empty and taking action when private properties are becoming derelict.


But the owner has a right to leave it empty and there is no longer a right to squat. Just strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But you don't think the same protection should be afforded to those on the anti-LTN side...? Given the witch hunt some are be conducting to unearth which local residents are involved (see numerous examples on this forum), given the vandalism of the anti-LTN signs and interference with cars, labelling of anyone who opposes as some sort of petrol-head facist and given even Anna Goodman's tearing down of an anti-LTN poster you still think you only want anonimyity for those on one side of the argument? Does that not seem slightly hypocritical...it's why your first post on this issue entertained so many of us - it seemed ever so one-sided and summed up the challenges anyone who opposes the measures has to fight?
    • Hello again, Rubie, my cat, is still missing. He has been gone since 18th April.  Rubie is black and white, with black ears, a splendid white moustache, white front paws, and mostly white back legs.  Please check your sheds etc as he may be trapped, he’s a curious little thing.  I would really appreciate any help and suggestions. Thank you.
    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
    • I’ll post it to the DVLA if i don’t find the owner by midweek. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...