Jump to content

Recommended Posts

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh God we're not related are we RH ? ,one of my

> many brothers used to prize his compact edition

> and the bog standard version was my choice of

> accompaniment for the police station when being

> arrested .



Ha! The compact edition and its accompanying magnifying glass has been an obsession since I was about six, and my old man passed it on to me when someone gave him the latest edition as a retirement gift. I'm hoping to avoid arrest in the foreseeable future, but it has a very good chance of coming with me to the desert island when Kirsty (or Lauren as it is now) calls - just matter of time...

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Frenchy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > It takes 10 minutes on average to cut a man's

> hair in a barbers.

> >

> > It's like most things in life, Mick: you get

> what you pay for.

>

> I used to go to a place that charged ?15

> (basically the cheapest barbers I could find in

> The City). I was in and out in 15 minutes. Then I

> started going to a place that charges ?33.. but

> they wash your hair, cut it really nicely, then

> wash it again to get all the bits out. They

> eliminate my mono-brow, burn off the ear hairs,

> and put a nice moisturizer on your face and neck.

> You also get a little shoulder massage, and of

> course a coffee or beer. It's a great after work

> de-stresser, and besides... it's not 1992 any

> more, nobody needs to convince anyone they're a

> "real man". Some things have improved for the

> better.. embrace it.


Barber or hairdresser? That sounds a reasonable price for that kind of service. I?ve never had a hairdresser wash my hair again to get bits out @fter cutting.

Rosetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fishbiscuits Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Frenchy Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Mick Mac Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > > It takes 10 minutes on average to cut a

> man's

> > hair in a barbers.

> > >

> > > It's like most things in life, Mick: you get

> > what you pay for.

> >

> > I used to go to a place that charged ?15

> > (basically the cheapest barbers I could find in

> > The City). I was in and out in 15 minutes. Then

> I

> > started going to a place that charges ?33.. but

> > they wash your hair, cut it really nicely, then

> > wash it again to get all the bits out. They

> > eliminate my mono-brow, burn off the ear hairs,

> > and put a nice moisturizer on your face and

> neck.

> > You also get a little shoulder massage, and of

> > course a coffee or beer. It's a great after

> work

> > de-stresser, and besides... it's not 1992 any

> > more, nobody needs to convince anyone they're a

> > "real man". Some things have improved for the

> > better.. embrace it.

>

> Barber or hairdresser? That sounds a reasonable

> price for that kind of service. I?ve never had a

> hairdresser wash my hair again to get bits out

> @fter cutting.


Actually sounds sensible.


The danger of course is you'll run into Gavin Henson.

  • 4 weeks later...

Sorry to revive old thread but I was talking to the owner of a salon and they had good advice. If it?s over ?50 for standard haircut they don?t necessarily expect a tip as they are very well paid. If it?s under ?30/40 then a tip is great. Under ?30 definitely tip.

Made sense to me!

Rosetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Was up at Brockley Rise SE23 the other day, and

> there are a couple of barber shops and a

> hairdresser. One of the barber shops advertised

> ?12 for a wash and cut for a man and ?14 for a

> woman?s. Good prices in these austere times.



Well, certainly cheap, but it depends on the quality of the cut, doesn't it?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...