Jump to content

Recommended Posts

AGW3 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a wonderful

> person.


I've met her in person and she's a nasty piece of work. She tried to get me banned by getting my name associated with a another banned member.

LuLu Too Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Like I said 'Hubris' isn't the right word to

> > describe me and to be frank no one in my

> lifetime

> > have successfully put a label on me either.

>

>

> F60.1?


Not even that.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AGW3 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a

> wonderful

> > person.

>

> I've met her in person and she's a nasty piece of

> work. She tried to get me banned by getting my

> name associated with a another banned member.


I'd like to say thanks AGW3 but I don't know who you are or if I do, I don't know your posting name from your one in real life.


As for you, UDT, you met me once, briefly, at another forumites birthday drinks ages ago. Now I don't particularly mind if you thought I was a nasty piece of work as we're not ever going to be friends so who cares but what I would like to know - if you bother to answer - is why you think 'I tried to get you banned by associating you with another banned forumite'. I haven't done any such thing and I think you should get your facts straight before posting stuff like that about me.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AGW3 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a

> wonderful

> > person.

>

> I've met her in person and she's a nasty piece of

> work.


I've met her too and I thought she was perfectly delightful - but now I realise that was what she wanted me to think - an idea she planted in my head.


I know this because I started to feel light-headed and queasy around the 6th pint and even had a kebab on the way home... and that's not like me.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only one who thinks Otta has been really

> good-humoured and patient, considering the depths

> of idiocy this thread has sunk to?


You deliberately overlooked Otta's behaviour where he called me an idiot several times.

Katie1997, I think UDT is referring to a thread many moons ago initiated by New Nexus, where we entertained ourselves for some hours by trying to guess the real identities behind new posters such as New Nexus and UDT who had peculiar, caricatured (almost comic book) personalities.


They were so extraordinary we couldn't believe they were real.


I, for one, now think UDT must be a creation of Ted Max so exceptional that we may as well think him real.


However, UDT in that 'special' way of thinking he has, assumed we were trying to get him banned. He was of course incorrect, but his paranoia seems to sweep all before it.


If I recall correctly, none of the proposed alter egos had actially been banned, although HAL9000 was on one of his holidays....

UDT, you have made me really sad here. I know you quite well from our football team and have never had a problem with you. However, I really do think that what you have said about our lovely Katie (and she is lovely) is well out of order.


Katie, I hope you are alright. Am seeing you later on today. I'll try to be on time.;-) xxx

Well on the link you provided katie1997 made a couple of lighthearted quips about your similarlity with another member of what I refer to lovingly as the 'lunatic fringe', and when you took offence apologised several times.


It seems here only error on that page was saying sorry?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These very anti social fireworks went on for at least fifteen years and were unbearable for both humans and pets.    Was extremely relieved that they moved a couple of years ago.  Never experienced such close proximity loud fireworks before.   But the ones that go off in the middle of the night are also very upsetting and annoying.  
    • Not they've gone. Everything has been ripped out. No sign of anyone new yet. 
    • The frequency of fireworks seems to be increasing. If revellers selected the low noise variety that would help, but the trend seems to be the louder the better. I do not think sensitivity to stimuli is the same as timidity. Unexpected, extremely loud bangs and unusual noises will startle most of us. Humans, unlike other animals, have the luxury of knowing what fireworks are and what the noise represents. Some animals do learn to cope but many do not. It could be their hearing is not as sensitive. We should not forget that many animals, including cats and dogs have hearing that is much more developed than ours.
    • ... when animal welfare wasn't quite so well advanced
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...