Jump to content

Fred Goodwin...sir

Mick Mac

By Mick Mac
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

AGW3 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a wonderful

> person.


I've met her in person and she's a nasty piece of work. She tried to get me banned by getting my name associated with a another banned member.

Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

LuLu Too Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Like I said 'Hubris' isn't the right word to

> > describe me and to be frank no one in my

> lifetime

> > have successfully put a label on me either.

>

>

> F60.1?


Not even that.

katie1997

katie1997

Posted
Posted

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AGW3 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a

> wonderful

> > person.

>

> I've met her in person and she's a nasty piece of

> work. She tried to get me banned by getting my

> name associated with a another banned member.


I'd like to say thanks AGW3 but I don't know who you are or if I do, I don't know your posting name from your one in real life.


As for you, UDT, you met me once, briefly, at another forumites birthday drinks ages ago. Now I don't particularly mind if you thought I was a nasty piece of work as we're not ever going to be friends so who cares but what I would like to know - if you bother to answer - is why you think 'I tried to get you banned by associating you with another banned forumite'. I haven't done any such thing and I think you should get your facts straight before posting stuff like that about me.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AGW3 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No need to be like this Udt. Katie is a

> wonderful

> > person.

>

> I've met her in person and she's a nasty piece of

> work.


I've met her too and I thought she was perfectly delightful - but now I realise that was what she wanted me to think - an idea she planted in my head.


I know this because I started to feel light-headed and queasy around the 6th pint and even had a kebab on the way home... and that's not like me.

Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only one who thinks Otta has been really

> good-humoured and patient, considering the depths

> of idiocy this thread has sunk to?


You deliberately overlooked Otta's behaviour where he called me an idiot several times.

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

Katie1997, I think UDT is referring to a thread many moons ago initiated by New Nexus, where we entertained ourselves for some hours by trying to guess the real identities behind new posters such as New Nexus and UDT who had peculiar, caricatured (almost comic book) personalities.


They were so extraordinary we couldn't believe they were real.


I, for one, now think UDT must be a creation of Ted Max so exceptional that we may as well think him real.


However, UDT in that 'special' way of thinking he has, assumed we were trying to get him banned. He was of course incorrect, but his paranoia seems to sweep all before it.


If I recall correctly, none of the proposed alter egos had actially been banned, although HAL9000 was on one of his holidays....

Laddy Muck

Laddy Muck

Posted
Posted

UDT, you have made me really sad here. I know you quite well from our football team and have never had a problem with you. However, I really do think that what you have said about our lovely Katie (and she is lovely) is well out of order.


Katie, I hope you are alright. Am seeing you later on today. I'll try to be on time.;-) xxx

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

Well on the link you provided katie1997 made a couple of lighthearted quips about your similarlity with another member of what I refer to lovingly as the 'lunatic fringe', and when you took offence apologised several times.


It seems here only error on that page was saying sorry?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue
      Noticeboard on Northcross Road

      By Sue · Posted

      Thank you, Pugwash. That's really useful information. Do you know who was responsible for the locks and keys, or which council department? Could you PM me if you don't want to put someone's personal details on here?  It may save me having to speak to Monica. Thanks.
    • Sue
      ED Nature Watch

      By Sue · Posted

      Does anybody know why? Trees aren't cut down for no reason. There must have been something wrong with it (I hope that was the reason). A child was recently killed and another one injured when a tree fell in a park (not in this area). It isn't always obvious from the outside when a tree is diseased or whatever, and I imagine the council would give safety considerations priority when deciding what to do, if there was any doubt at all.
    • Han92-ED
      ED Nature Watch

      By Han92-ED · Posted

      It looks like they have cut it down completely now 😭
    • Sue
      Yet another burst main... major leak on Lordship Lane nr junction with Barry Rd

      By Sue · Posted

      Different people will be  involved within Thames Water. The people dealing with the leaks aren't the people encouraging less water usage. How many people have reported the Barry Road leak? By what channels? What response have they had? When we had a leak in our road which meant we had no water, several people reported it, there was good communication with TW, they explained why they couldn't come out immediately (other urgent jobs elsewhere in the area) , kept  in touch with us and fixed the leak within a reasonable timescale (hours). Someone from TW also contacted me later to make sure my water was back. But does Thames Water know about it? They aren't psychic (I presume). If nobody reports it, I also presume they won't even know the leaks are  there, unless they have some kind of central monitoring system which tells them when there are leaks in the system. To make it clear, I am not defending Thames Water as a company, which I think should never have been privatised.  But there are some things they can't be blamed for (old and disintegrating water pipe system in London) and some they can (possibly, lack of sufficient staff to deal with leaks, maybe due to trying to save money to give their shareholders more. But this is just surmise on my part - I know nothing about Thames Water).

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...