Jump to content

23rd March - ?Put It To The People March? - central London


Recommended Posts

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You can't discount the ones who didn't vote and

> use them in your stats against those who did.

> Those who didn't vote also didn't vote to remain,

> so like for like, you could say even less people

> voted Remain than the actual results.

>

> Gets a bit cloudy, doesn't it.


We also have the foreign people in the UK and/or the UK people abroad (one or the other should have been allowed to vote)

Passiflora Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh come on civilservant, what are you a leaver or remainer?


didn't realise i had to spell it out, given that i was clearly agreeing with Joeleg about the ridiculously slender margin - as the woman on question time pointed out, you wouldn't change the rules of a golf club on that type of knife-edge vote.


fwitw i voted remain and would do so again if ever a second vote came to pass

i am not into self-harm, nor do i get a kick out of harming the future prospects of the people i share this country with

Passiflora Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Slender margin or what (one point two million

> voters in 2016) hope the People March have a good

> day.


1.2 million voters sounds frightfully impressive, doesn't it? 3.78% doesn't sound quite so great, and well within the tolerance limits of Brexiters who said it would be "unfinished business" if it was 52-48.

You seem obsessed with the raw number. It means nothing on its own. The percentage is the important factor.


If you won by just one vote it?s massive of three of you voted, not so massive if 30 of you voted, and pretty small if 300 of you voted, and so on and so on...


It may sound impressive to you, but not to a lot of other people.

The impact of social media on the EU referendum.


http://www.referendumanalysis.eu/eu-referendum-analysis-2016/section-7-social-media/impact-of-social-media-on-the-outcome-of-the-eu-referendum/


This doesn't mention why the leave campaign had more influence, just that it did. How it did is another story.

If you are so inclined this is worth watch...?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6gf5whRuQ0

  • 4 weeks later...
Does anyone know what the logic was in holding the march after the EU summit? I realise that the march had to be booked in advance, but the EU summits are known in advance too, and it was always felt that next week's summit could be a biggie for May in trying to squeeze something out of the EU. Marches are all about getting seen and being heard, so to hold the march before the summit surely would've made more sense than after...

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does anyone know what the logic was in holding the

> march after the EU summit?


Sorry to edit your question as above but there is no logic whatsoever.


A referendum is held on staying in or leaving the EU.


Leave wins. Losers don?t like the result and campaign to overthrow the result by ...wait for it... having another referendum even though they don?t respect the results of referendums.


You couldn?t make it up

The "Leave" campaign was based on some highly tenuous claims, particularly the outrageous "?350 million a week for the NHS" bus. That alone justifies a re-run IMO. Then add in the fact that there was almost no mention of the Northern Ireland conundrum running up to the original referendum... many of us are more aware of the realities and intricacies of the situation now. A second referendum seems completely logical.


Unfortunately it probably won't happen, there is insufficient will in the two main parties.

With references to the numbers and percentages:


D14tgysX0AE-Cs4.jpg:small


If you think it's a clear majority, try getting two identical containers and putting 52 grains of rice in one of them and 48 grains in the other. Then tell me how clear cut that result is....

1,137,100 people live in Birmingham according to the mid 2017 population estimates.


That is a smaller number than the majority in the referendum.


https://www.birmingham.gov.uk/info/20057/about_birmingham/1294/population_and_census/2


That should keep you busy counting rice grains exdulwicher

There was a lively discussion between leavers and remainers on the Farage march yesterday. One of the leave organisers came charging over and committed assault. tweet with video now deleted (I should have saved it) but the crazed look on his face was something to see.


https://www.shieldsgazette.com/news/crime/police-probe-assault-complaint-after-woman-says-she-was-pushed-during-march-to-leave-protest-in-sunderland-1-9656935

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the shambles that is happening is enough

> to make anyone crazy.



Oh I understand that - organises a march, turns up at Sunderland and there's a load of remainers there (and they were all waiting at the pub in Middlesborough too) :).


Feels a bit like the boating thing on the Thames (Geldof vs Farage)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...