Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue's language may have came across as rather blunt, but IMO East Dulwich is a more pleasant area with better facilities and a better mix of local businesses. I think that's reflected in the difference in price between nearby areas like Forest Hill, Sydenham, Peckham, etc. But these things are all subjective to an extent, so if you prefer living in Forest Hill, then great.
I'm selling up as this mentalism cannot surely last and anyway it's time to move on I want to be closer to a Papa John's so I can take advantage of buy direct discounts. Anyway I have a 3 bedder South facing garden house so I hope one of the soon to be new East Dulwichians will pay for the privilege and I will get value elsewhere. My property developer builder reckons there are only 3 agents worthe bothering with in ED - Haart,Winkworths and Bushells
I agree with jerememy. Property in ED is more expensive than most surroundiong areas and the main reason being down to the fact that there are better facilities and a better mix of local businesses. I don't know why people are always so surprised by this. Face it ED is a good place to live with high demand. It is still cheaper than Herne Hill, Clapham, parts of Brixton....

Surely it all depends on why you want to buy. If you want to live in it, buy here and bite the bullet in terms of mortgage. If you want to rent it out, buy elsewhere where there is still value and uplift to come and let someone else live there while the area improves. Nunhead springs to mind though I find it a bit dull tbh. It could be very pretty and is better in my view at least than the much pricier area around the pottery art cafe place. Any thoughts?


Sorry - not really on topic I know. Property carries you away!

Ok, you can have gyms - but what other actual amenities do you think south London and East Dulwich in particular are lacking v_the_gelfling? And please don't say The Tube. If we had a tube station property prices here would be on a par with Clapham.


As for prices ... I have been looking at a typical ED house (ie. a small terraced one) which is on the market for ?275,000 more than it sold for 24 months ago. That's called vendors being very greedy that is.

I think the facilities are pretty good within East Dulwich and its easily accessible environs. The gyms get the job done and on top of that the large "fitness in the park" operations are in the area (Peckham Common and Dulwich Park). We have two golf courses, 3 tennis clubs, multiple squash facilities, great independent schools nearby, lots of green space (the parks and the woods), two museums, in addition to lively bars and restaurants. The cinema in Peckham is easy enough to get to though noisy kids can be a problem. East dulwich itself is small so lots of these things surround the local area but we are in the best position to access the wide range of the things the various south london neighborhoods, north, south east and west of us have to offer.

having lived here for more years than I care to mention I am mildly interested at how ridiculously expensive the entire area has become with flats selling for considerably more than houses sold a decade ago.


I remember when you could buy all this for a fiver and still have change for a poke of chips on the way home ..yaddaydadda


feel sorry for people trying to get on the housing ladder - good luck

Dorothy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ok, you can have gyms - but what other actual

> amenities do you think south London and East

> Dulwich in particular are lacking v_the_gelfling?

> And please don't say The Tube. If we had a tube

> station property prices here would be on a par

> with Clapham.

>

> As for prices ... I have been looking at a typical

> ED house (ie. a small terraced one) which is on

> the market for ?275,000 more than it sold for 24

> months ago. That's called vendors being very

> greedy that is.



Would love to see this. Can you provide a link?

Thanks for the correction motorbird. Do people really think property in ED is over priced because I don't. I think you get what you pay for. If you are looking for value then it is probably best to look elsewhere, but i believe there are a number of very good reasons why property is priced accrodingly in ED. I also believe that the large number of people who are prepared to buy property here recognise those reasons too.

Dorothy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As for prices ... I have been looking at a typical ED house (ie. a small terraced one) which is on

> the market for ?275,000 more than it sold for 24 months ago. That's called vendors being very

> greedy that is.


House prices are only what the market sets. Someone isn't 'greedy' for asking the market rate, they would be foolish to sit down and think, 'I know the estate agent said ?500K, but I am going to put it up for a fair price of ?350K'. All that will happen is that some sharp-eyed person (probably in the estate agents themselves) will grab it and resell it and pocket the money themselves.

Miaow, Sue! I'm talking about people who can't afford ?500k for a terraced house like me and I'm not sad about it, I've just moved where I can afford and am pretty happy here. Not only can I get into ED in 10 mins, I now go south and visit Beckenham and Crystal Palace as well. I have to say, even if I won the lottery you couldn't tempt me back to ED!

I never said East Dulwich is perfect. My husband and I are currently deciding where we want to buy our family home when we sell our flat. We aren't planning to sell for a while but since we've been in ED on for quite some time now, we want to get to know other areas a bit better that offer things that ED doesn't (better transport links to the West End, a bit safer,though I think its pretty safe). However,ED, even taking into consideration what it lacks, still offers good value for money in my view compared to some of the places we are considering where we can only get a 3 bed "cottage" for the same price as a 4 bed house with a big garden here.


Loz, I agree with you entirely. If the house is priced in line with market prices for similar properties in the area, the seller isn't greedy. Plus, buyers often have no idea what the current owner has done to improve the property (extension, loft conversion, full refurb etc). Market prices are a function of supply and demand intermediated by interest rates. Demonizing sellers is silly.

Properties selling for well above the previous sale prices of similar properties in the neighbouring area are likely to be knocked down by surveyors when it comes to arranging the mortgage, and apparently they often knock it down below what it should/could have been. This happened recently to a friend of mine selling in Camberwell and by all accounts it's not that unusual.


We recently put our 2-bed flat on the market and were advised by several agents to put it on for an outrageous ?40-?50K more than the expected sale price. Similar properties in the area have been achieving high sale prices recently, presumably due to the lack of properties on the market currently compared to demand.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...