Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There will be minutes of the debate available at some point SF but I think the result doesn't suggest too many arguments against.


I've seen the Stonewall ads but don't really know if I think they are an effective addition to the debate. After all, the debate is a religious one at the core of most opposition. And no-one is denying that gay people exist. If instead of saying 'Some people are gay - get over it', the ad said 'God makes some people gay - get over it', then it might have more impact, whilst at the same time confronting the core prong of opposition.

Is this the standard clarion call of any theological debate these days? "Ooh, you wouldn't say that about the Muslims".


Forget about the Muslims already.

We live in the UK. The Queen is the head of the Church of England. She's also head of state.


And that's what this is fuss is all about: church and state.

I tend to agree with Loz that use of the word God (Allah) and gay in the same sentence on a bus would be too controversial for some people/institutions. But the minority outrage shouldn't have the power it does, not in the UK anyway. Bob is right though about the church and state dilema. It is because the Anglican church has such an entrneched constitutional and historical connection to the dominent culture that there is time given to the views of its opponents. Other religions outside of that establishment have gone through many changes in law that conflict with their beliefs, catholicism and abortion for example, without much regard for their beliefs by the state.

I don't buy that 'not having a pop at Islam' is down to being scared - or somehow 'not being allowed'.


The truth is that most people, myself included, know hardly anything about Islam. This in contrast Christianity, a religion bound up in the state, schools, architecture, media, social life etc etc for a millennia and a half or whatever, undergoing tumultuous change - not to mention considerable moderation - along the way.


Like most people, I can't say anything about Islam these days. But then I don't actually know anything about it, so it's probably best if I don't.


You don't have to go back too many centuries in England before such a poster would have earned you a cruel, summary death.


Where and what will Islam in the UK be in four hundred years?

Incidentally, The Beeb have been running a primetime, pre-watershed TV poster campaign called 'Allah makes some people gay, get over it', for a couple of years now.



To date, a mob sporting explosive belts and Russian-made assault rifles have not surrounded White City.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
hmm if one is trying to convince someone who believes that a god needs to be prayed too otherwise there in the merde then your gonna have to do a lot to convince them that a persons sexuality is their choice and as humans they have the exact same rights as all, and if they the gays are also deluded to believe in a god then all i can say is agadoo doo doo at least theirs will be better dressed, and i,d love to see a gay church service
Hmmm.....teenagers use the word gay to mean naff and stupid too but it is hard to seperate it's connection with homosexuality and the idea that anything (or anyone) 'gay' is therefore inferior. And before that it was a word commonly used to hint at immorality and/or promiscuity (a use that can be traced all the way back to the 1630's) which then prompts the question as to why homosexuals adopted the word for their own use (thought to have emerged into mainstream language from slang used by homosexuals themselves around the 1940's). What's most interesting to me is that a word that originally was commonly used to insinuate promiscuity/ immorality and prostitution has come to mean naff and stupid in less than 100 years, with a little homosexual adoption in between. The evolution of languase is fascinating sometimes.
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...