Jump to content

Gay marriage? Let's have a referendum


Recommended Posts

There will be minutes of the debate available at some point SF but I think the result doesn't suggest too many arguments against.


I've seen the Stonewall ads but don't really know if I think they are an effective addition to the debate. After all, the debate is a religious one at the core of most opposition. And no-one is denying that gay people exist. If instead of saying 'Some people are gay - get over it', the ad said 'God makes some people gay - get over it', then it might have more impact, whilst at the same time confronting the core prong of opposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this the standard clarion call of any theological debate these days? "Ooh, you wouldn't say that about the Muslims".


Forget about the Muslims already.

We live in the UK. The Queen is the head of the Church of England. She's also head of state.


And that's what this is fuss is all about: church and state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with Loz that use of the word God (Allah) and gay in the same sentence on a bus would be too controversial for some people/institutions. But the minority outrage shouldn't have the power it does, not in the UK anyway. Bob is right though about the church and state dilema. It is because the Anglican church has such an entrneched constitutional and historical connection to the dominent culture that there is time given to the views of its opponents. Other religions outside of that establishment have gone through many changes in law that conflict with their beliefs, catholicism and abortion for example, without much regard for their beliefs by the state.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point I was trying to make Bob is that non-Christians feel they can attack the Christian church (not just C of E) in a way they would never dream (and would indeed be scared of) attacking other religions.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't buy that 'not having a pop at Islam' is down to being scared - or somehow 'not being allowed'.


The truth is that most people, myself included, know hardly anything about Islam. This in contrast Christianity, a religion bound up in the state, schools, architecture, media, social life etc etc for a millennia and a half or whatever, undergoing tumultuous change - not to mention considerable moderation - along the way.


Like most people, I can't say anything about Islam these days. But then I don't actually know anything about it, so it's probably best if I don't.


You don't have to go back too many centuries in England before such a poster would have earned you a cruel, summary death.


Where and what will Islam in the UK be in four hundred years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incidentally, The Beeb have been running a primetime, pre-watershed TV poster campaign called 'Allah makes some people gay, get over it', for a couple of years now.



To date, a mob sporting explosive belts and Russian-made assault rifles have not surrounded White City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
hmm if one is trying to convince someone who believes that a god needs to be prayed too otherwise there in the merde then your gonna have to do a lot to convince them that a persons sexuality is their choice and as humans they have the exact same rights as all, and if they the gays are also deluded to believe in a god then all i can say is agadoo doo doo at least theirs will be better dressed, and i,d love to see a gay church service
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm.....teenagers use the word gay to mean naff and stupid too but it is hard to seperate it's connection with homosexuality and the idea that anything (or anyone) 'gay' is therefore inferior. And before that it was a word commonly used to hint at immorality and/or promiscuity (a use that can be traced all the way back to the 1630's) which then prompts the question as to why homosexuals adopted the word for their own use (thought to have emerged into mainstream language from slang used by homosexuals themselves around the 1940's). What's most interesting to me is that a word that originally was commonly used to insinuate promiscuity/ immorality and prostitution has come to mean naff and stupid in less than 100 years, with a little homosexual adoption in between. The evolution of languase is fascinating sometimes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello! We need a few product shots for our new personalised baby bear hooded jumpsuit (pictured).  We'd just need around an hour or so of your (and your baby's!) time.  In return, we'll hand-felt your little one's name onto a jumpsuit to gift you at the end of the shoot as well as provide a £30 thank you payment. If you're interested please either reply to this thread or drop me a text on 07877 734099 to arrange a mutually convenient time. Photo shoot to take place in East Dulwich at our residential address. Thanks, Sam    
    • Many thanks for your detailed reply. Our floor was originally concrete too - had the floorboards down for years now and need a change. thanks again
    • Although I think you're right to address your concerns about what you perceive as an attack on your business.  I do feel I need to respond to some of your comments;  I haven’t noticed any criticism in the posts of the clinical care delivered,  all the criticism has been in relation to your charges and billing,  which when compared to other practices does seem high. We know vets are business and don't expect treatment for free! But when prices are significantly higher people are going to question it.  This occurs not only on social media,  but in parks up and down the country as dog owners do discuss this.    I agree your analogy that people can choose where to purchase their veterinary care, a bit like where they choose to purchase their groceries ( convenience store versus sainsburys versus Aldi etc). The big difference is with the supermarket chains there is choice.  Sadly what is happening with veterinary practices is a few massive chains have brought up all the previously independent practices,  therefore there isn't any real choice and these chains are monopolising the industry and forcing up prices to shocking levels ( veterinary prices have risen more than any other industry). I welcome the formal investigation of the CMA into veterinary costs. 
    • Neither of which are Dulwich private schools though. I also wasn't being entirely serious.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...