Jump to content

Recommended Posts

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well kford, October 31 is 22 or 23 weeks away. As

> things stand your theories might soon be tested.



With any luck, we'll see sense and stay wedded to the world's biggest trading bloc.


If we don't, I'll suspect you and all the other Let's-go-WTO loonies will go very quiet, or, more likely, start blaming everyone but yourselves for the mess you've got us into.

kford Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> or, more

> likely, start blaming everyone but yourselves for

> the mess you've got us into.


The betrayal narrative started yonks ago, and that's all that Farage has dished out during this election, no policies, just the language of betrayal. Populism is easy solutions to complex problems and when they don't work it's the fault of others, that they weren't carried out properly, that they didn't 'believe' in them enough. A comforting lie is easier to sell than an uncomfortable truth. Much easier for the modern day careerist politician to carry on citing the imaginary 'will of the people' when in fact they should be telling the country the uncomfortable truth that what was promised was simply undeliverable...

Let's face it, Tories will be lucky to get one seat, BP are likely to get most of the seats but not all.

It means that the Tories have well and truly hung themselves, not just their handling Brexit but all the other things they've done. If BP win, it means that there is a huge number of people who want to leave, so a 2nd Reform is risky for Remainets, as the might not win again. It does not define the terms of how we would leave. It would be foolish to leave on solely WTO terms.... so, really back to square one. But worse as it would prove no strong confidence in our government at all.

lilolil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe I'm missing something. Perhaps someone on

> the forum can enlighten me...

> Why, when I didn't have a polling card and only

> gave my name and address was I not asked for

> identification??


The tricky part is: if you wanted to ask for ID, what identification would you even ask for, in a country in which there is no compulsory form of ID?


Passports and driving licences would presumably be accepted. But what about those people who have neither? Plus driving licences do not show citizenship.


If you think of it, this (the lack of compulsory ID and lack of a population register) is the key reason behind the Windrush scandal, which could have NEVER happened in most countries in continental Europe, as they tend to have compulsory ID and a population register, often listing whether you are a citizen or a foreign resident in the country.


In fact, how do you even prove citizenship without holding a passport? Windrush has shown that, in many cases, you don't - indeed British citizens were deported illegally!


It's also why foreign parents (especially European) of children born here and entitled to British citizenship are strongly advised to apply for a British passport straight away, since proving the settled status of the parents, which entitles the children to citizenship, can be hard if not impossible if done many years after birth.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not ideal I grant you but if Parliament cannot get

> its act together we will crash out in October no

> matter what the prima donnas think they?ve ruled

> out. Macron?s in no mood for interminable

> extensions.

>

> WTO though would apply in the two-year extension

> period while our future relationship is

> negotiated.

>

> Who will be negotiating the future relationship?

> After today?s elections will Farage be involved?


Only if he succeeds in a General Election and enters a coalition IMHO.


A General Election is unavoidable now - probably the Autumn.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let's face it, Tories will be lucky to get one

> seat, BP are likely to get most of the seats but

> not all.

> It means that the Tories have well and truly hung

> themselves, not just their handling Brexit but all

> the other things they've done. If BP win, it means

> that there is a huge number of people who want to

> leave, so a 2nd Reform is risky for Remainets, as

> the might not win again. It does not define the

> terms of how we would leave. It would be foolish

> to leave on solely WTO terms.... so, really back

> to square one. But worse as it would prove no

> strong confidence in our government at all.


The deal is still on the table as far as the EU is concerned and if we go WTO/No Deal and then want to negotiate a free trade deal with them at any future point - then we must accept the deal.


So any referendum may as well include what has already been negotiated, remain and no deal on a STV. I still believe there are big security issues with No Deal that we are not privy too as they are too sensitive.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The deal is still on the table as far as the EU is

> concerned...


Worth noting that as a condition of the extension the WA cannot be reopened, so hopefully when Johnson et al start spouting such nonsense, the political journos point this out. Also, by the time a new leader is elected and with the summer recess, there will be no time to get any deal or even no deal through before the extension ends. But recent history tells us this will all be ignored and we'll get weeks of hard Brexiters promising yet more undeliverable, comforting lies to the Brexit supporters. This piece written by David Allen Green just after the last GE on why May would fail stands up well...https://www.ft.com/content/a46d09b5-e2da-398f-9f04-130764b56427

Also worth noting regarding whoever the Tories elect as leader...


The Cabinet Manual says that once a PM resigns ''The Sovereign will invite the person who appears most likely to be able to command the confidence of the House to serve as PM''


If that is a hard Brexiter, especially a No Deal one like Johnson, then I can think of a few Tories who won't support such a person. With such a slim majority in the HoC, it looks like what has dogged Brexit all along will also be a problem with whoever they elect, in that if you appease one side of the Brexit divide you alienate the other side.

And if Johnson wins and calls an election, he's skating on thin ice, at the last election his majority was halved down to 5k, throw in a rejuvenated Lib Dem party and the Brexit party and that could disappear very quickly. More fun and games ahead people...:)

peckman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Im a remainer but getting to the point of thinking

> let the brexiteers completely @#$%& it up .. all

> keep our head down for 5 or so years until people

> wake up and realise


What is the point of the UK having General Elections to choose a new Government or PM.

if we then pay ?Billions to the E.U. to make Laws for us and decide / dictate what we are allowed to do.


The UK Great Britain managed for centuries to run our own affairs and after Brexit we will do so again.


Fox

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What laws have the made for us foxy? What is we

> want to do but can?t?

>

> And you are aware that we pay but also gain back

> right?

>

> Why after 3 years won?t facts penetrate?


The E.U. does not directly make rules for The U.K.

But the rules The U.K. Government makes are subjected to the scrutiny of the E.U.

and the restrictions they impose on such rules.

They have the final word.

It?s a collective decision foxy. We are part of the process


What you and your fellow leavers are doing is depriving us of any day. We will need deals with eu, USA, China, India etc. And we will have to follow their rules because we will be desperate. Oh and those rules will preclude other rules


So if we accept American meat, we close off European access


Everything you want leaves us worse off. We had by some distance the sweetest deal. But still. Rule Britannia and all that what what

Guess what DF, if we Brexit and set up separate trade deals we'll be subject to lots of rules/caveats/restrictions etc, especially from big hitters like the US and China who will really be able to turn the screw on li'l ol' UK, assuming we are still the UK. Welcome to the world of global trading...

Name them foxy


I?m calling bullshit on this prediction. (Same with all leaver predictions from last 4 years. ?Easiest deal in history?. ?They will be queuing up to make a deal with us? etc etc ??)


You are spouting dank nonsense from there far reaches of the internet/YouTube


You know nothing


You have a grudge.


You can not make a simple case without spouting memes


You are shitting the bed for the rest of us after you are gone


Please stop

🕳 and we?re back in the fox hole.


I get fed up with the laziness of people?s arbitrary use of 10


Why not 9 or 11?


It?s a bit like when people call me up and say, I want a discount


?Give me 10% off and we have a deal? to which my thoughts are that 10% represents their level of competence, any more complex thinking is beyond them.


And we?re the same here, grabbing at a figure and gluing some random outcome to it.


Consistent though.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The E.U is unlikely to survive another 10 years.

>

> >

> > We are getting out at the right time. Others

> WILL

> > follow.

>

>

> What are you basing this statement on, exactly?


WHY do I have to Justify EVERY comment I post to you. ??


Fox

I dunno keano. I reckon a whole bunch of documents will have been signed, and will be legally binding with smart people able to examine them if there is any get out


Of course we could just listen to another sad-sack with a worrying YouTube history on an Internet forum and say it?s made up

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...