Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all. Not sure the best place to post this so I thought I'd start here!


Is there such thing as an exchange of skills system yet in ED? Got thinking about this since moving into my new flat here 3 weeks ago. There's a fair bit I want to do to the place so am spending hours looking through the EDF for recommendations for plumbers, gardeners, decorators etc (and very handy it is too!)


However I'm a professional classical musician and there are undoubtably people looking at the forum for music/theory/instrumental lessons. I often have free tickets for big concerts in London too, but they are usually wasted!


How brilliant to swap these skills to everyone's advantage! (tu)

Any thoughts?


Helen :)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/22732-exchange-of-skills/
Share on other sites

HelBel65 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi all. Not sure the best place to post this so I

> thought I'd start here!

>

> Is there such thing as an exchange of skills

> system yet in ED? Got thinking about this since

> moving into my new flat here 3 weeks ago. There's

> a fair bit I want to do to the place so am

> spending hours looking through the EDF for

> recommendations for plumbers, gardeners,

> decorators etc (and very handy it is too!)

>

> However I'm a professional classical musician and

> there are undoubtably people looking at the forum

> for music/theory/instrumental lessons. I often

> have free tickets for big concerts in London too,

> but they are usually wasted!

>

> How brilliant to swap these skills to everyone's

> advantage! (tu)

> Any thoughts?

>

> Helen :)


I'm good in the sack . . .

It's a great idea but.... have you considered the tax implications?


On a small scale where it's just about a couple of people helping each other out it's probably not worth HMRC pursuing, but on a 'village' scale they may not be so lenient.


Technically barter (swapping) amounts to evasion of income tax, corporation tax or VAT and could possibly also amount to fraud.


Make it visible on a local forum and the evidence is right in front of them!


Secondly there's practicality: it may be difficult to identify two indviduals who have corresponding items. It may require three, four or more individuals operating in a network to ensure that everyone gets what they want.


Comparative value then becomes difficult to ascertain, so it usually involves the creation of a 'value' score for each product that then becomes a currency in its own right.


You'd need some sort of monetary authority to oversee that to ensure transparency and accountability.


Where this was achieved in Totnes, the Totnes pound was freely changeable with sterling at a 1:1 value - and since neither customers nor businesses were obliged to accept it, it became a timely and effective marketing gimmick that promoted local business, rather than one that leveraged it.


I'd probably just stick to occasional friendly swaps to avoid the pitfalls and possible legal issues that an 'organised' arrangement would entail.

My mum has been instrumental in setting up one of these in a small town in Middle England's herartlands as part of the whole transition towns thingy.


I must say, as noble and sweet and well intentioned as it all sounds, my reaction was a little bit like Huguenot's. The moment it stops being good folk acting all neighbourly to each other and becomes a medium of exchange I can't see how it avoids becoming a different version of money.


Surely anyone who's skills are in greater demand gets more of other people's services in return for their own, in other words they get paid more.


And to echo Huguenot, if it becomes popoular and formalised then the state inevitably wants to get their fair share, at which point everything becomes quantifiable and divisible and you either have to work for the state or use some sort of transferrable means of exchange to reflect the value of your services offered, perhaps by creating IOUs out of paper and writing different numbers on them to reflect how much of a service they can be exchanged for or for anything of equivalent value.


You can see where I'm going with this can't you.... ;)

  • 2 weeks later...

This is a concept I've been interested in for a while. It seems that there's quite a few folks doing it, this site seems to have a fairly decent set up: http://www.swapaskill.com/


I'd love to know the law on this? Surely it can only be perceived as fraudulent when it's approached as a time banking thing, where units of 'time' are earned and can be spent within the participating community. That's basically currency. But to me that is different than a plumber fixing an electricians sink in exchange for new sockets??

This is a bit of side ways view , but relevant as it shows the power of communal action & labour


I've long admired this


Also, if you google Organop?nicos ( for some reason I can't get the link to work) you might find it interesting too



Personally I say trade on


( and the trade have done this with each other for years btw )


I mean really, what are they (the man) going to do? take you to court because you plumbed a sink in in exchange for a few light sockets.


:-S


Netts(tu)

I think it's a good idea, but it's likely to work best for tasks which aren't your profession. Good examples might be teaching languages, helping out with DIY, driving, gardening, (non-professional) music lessons, music production, etc. The moment you're giving up your time as a professional, it's likely to get rather too serious.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...