Mick Mac Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAgain, I beat him to it again......Hahahahaha Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-228353 Share on other sites More sharing options...
???? Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Looks like free banking for the prudent will now be going thanks to the likely ruling*walks away whistling Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268164 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanMacGabhann Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 blimey, that was a blast from the past re-reading that lot! Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268173 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 As usual you have it sussed there quids. Oh wait, what if one of the banks offers free banking in order to attract customers? I?m not sure but I?ve heard somewhere that that is how this thing called capitalism works. Unless of course they all have some sort of agreement with one another. Oh but wait a minute. That?s called a cartel. They?re illegal aren?t they? Or does the law not apply to financial institutions? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268184 Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_carnell Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 But the banks have won.Bugger. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268208 Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinceayre Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Actually capitalism isn't working as it should because if it was RBS and HBOS who are both still insolvent would have been allowed to go bust due to creative destruction which would have allowed only the fit to survive. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268212 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Capitalism needs to be regulated by government in order to work properly though. Part of that is not allowing complete monopolies to develop. That could be one argument for keeping more banks around. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268215 Share on other sites More sharing options...
???? Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Brendan the banks do all offer free banking. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268238 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 yeah I know but you were suggesting that they were going to stop. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268245 Share on other sites More sharing options...
red devil Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 yes Quids, but would it be fair to say 'free banking' is subsidised by these disproportionate charges?.. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268247 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanMacGabhann Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 And many people would say "what's wrong with that"?I'm not sure why "free banking" is particular to this country tho. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268250 Share on other sites More sharing options...
???? Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 The verdict was unexpected, if it had gone the other way the would have stopped....from BBCIt took Lord Phillips just a couple of minutes to deliver a profoundly important ruling for UK banks and their customers.The Supreme Court has decided that for the past two and a half years the OFT has been barking up the wrong legal tree. The result is that banks can continue charging high fees for customers who go overdrawn without authority to subsidise the cost of providing current accounts to other customers who stay in the black. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268252 Share on other sites More sharing options...
red devil Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Well Sean you can apply that mantra to anything the banks or capitalism does, afterall it's a free market economy - supply and demand et al, but there comes a point where it gets out of hand as we have just experienced with the credit crunch. Brendan is right with bringing in regulation to capitalism, do you trust them not to screw up again?.. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268254 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendan Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 I must admit to not knowing a lot about the issues argued or the case but when did charging penalty rates start to be the reason for providing current accounts for free? Not all of them are free anyway. And anyway a current account isn?t really ?free? even if it is free. They get your salary every month to do with what they will. Not to mention your savings which most people will have through the same bank. And unless you live in a house that wasn?t procured in some way with a mortgage, you have never bought anything on credit and you have never paid tax on anything, banking is not free. I don?t have any problem with an agreed fee being paid for an agreed service but if someone doesn?t have money in an account why not just not allow money to be taken out of it? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268261 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jah Lush Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 What Brendan said. Banks aren't free. They are thieving bastards. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268283 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanMacGabhann Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 red devil - it's no mantra of mine, I just said many people might ask itAnd even tho I work for "them" I trust them not a jot Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268284 Share on other sites More sharing options...
???? Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 This probably sums it up besthttp://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/business/werewolves-win-right-to-tear-your-head-off-200911252257/ Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268339 Share on other sites More sharing options...
woofmarkthedog Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 OK block your ears , avert your eyes as you may find this offensiveI USE CASH* No charges , no fees, just filthy notes to trade with in your bin, Lastly the superior customer service you receive from the Butcher, the Baker , Candlestick maker is marvelous I tell youW**F* whenever I can Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268344 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asset Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Actually, the judge implied that while the OFT have been barking up the wrong tree, there is another tree that they can try so all is not yet lost. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2327-bank-charges/page/5/#findComment-268517 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now