Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy, I stand by my analogy.


Otta, I'm not going to trawl the forum for evidence for you. It's what I feel.


I assume the post above is what you feel? I didn't ask for evidence to support your view.


Now we have both said what we feel. What a great forum.

To be honest, my post was not intended to be sneering at Iceland or at anyone who goes to Iceland - it was more driven by how irritated I get at the ridiculous reverse snobbery trotted out by Louisa and one or two others on here about Iceland and M&S/Waitrose(as well as so many other entities).

Louisa does it to flame. It clearly works.




yeknomyeknom Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy, I stand by my analogy.

>

> Otta, I'm not going to trawl the forum for

> evidence for you. It's what I feel.

>

> I assume the post above is what you feel? I didn't

> ask for evidence to support your view.

>

> Now we have both said what we feel. What a great

> forum.



Nice bit of passive aggression there.

How so? I was telling you that Louisa likes to wind people up. Your responses to her show that she's having some level of sucess, hemnce the fact she's currently banned from the main section.


And to yeknomyeknom I was just saying that I don't think that (maybe Louisa aside) there is the same level of anti M&S/Waitrose, as there is nasty comments about Iceland. I have no problem with people wanting something other than Iceland, it's the vitreol that SOME have poured over Iceland customers that I think is pretty unpleasant.

I would like to see Iceland stay but happy to see M&S/Waitrose replace the Co-op.


The Co-op supposedly the People's supermarket is hardly what it set out to be when established in 1844.

It's dreadful in there, expensive. Apart from the many items on or near their Best By / Use By dates..


Let's keep Iceland and ditch The Co-op


DulwichFox

I think most of the comments against Iceland have been along the lines of ?the food is disgusting and the shop is an eyesore? rather than, ?only gross poor people shop at Iceland so let?s close it down.? I?m not saying the former sentiment is correct (I?ve never been to Iceland but I?ve learned on this thread the store has good veg and cheap dairy apparently!) but it?s not really sneering at the costumers either.


I also agree the reverse snobbery comments along the lines of ?only people with more money than sense committed to social cleansing of working class Dulwich? were primarily trolling / wind-ups.


I?m glad it?s an M&S rather than a Waitrose. I like Waitrose and would happily shop at one but ultimately it?s more of a generic supermarket. M&S is more special occasion picnic food, fancy snacks etc which at least is some variety compared to the other supermarkets already in the area. I get their single serving salads all the time from Waterloo so this will be much more convenient.


Louis PMd me the links to the updated planning documents that were posted last month. Haven?t read them but it certainly suggests things are moving forward.

LondonMix, please do share the link on the updated planning documents (I can't see anything new on the Southwark website relating to the application reference that was granted last year). PS - If Louisa is going to PM useful information of this sort, is it perhaps time to reconsider the decision to 'Lounge' her?

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would like to see Iceland stay but happy to see

> M&S/Waitrose replace the Co-op.


That would probably be the ideal outcome... the Co-op is poorly stocked, inferior quality food (IMO), and isn't cheap - hard to see any advantages. But unfortunately it is hard for local residents to influence such things.

I like some of the stuff in Iceland and I think some of it is garbage, I think the Co-op is having an identity crisis but I like the staff at both shops and when I can't be arsed to go to Lidl or Sainsburys they're fine.


If they were replaced by M&S, Waitrose, Aldi, etc etc I'm guessing the same shit would apply. As long as we don't end up with a Tescos or Morrisons.*


Asda would be okay too.



*Why should they be left out of the furore?

Co-Op's own brand food is a shocker. My young son was eating a sausage roll (one of his favourite things) from there the other day and was spitting bits out saying it had pips in it. I had to inform staff of little nibbles in all the bags of popcorn and in lots of the bread wrappers. Clearly a mouse problem. It's grim.

Not convinced that M&S replacing Iceland and Waitrose replacing Co-op really is the "best of both worlds".


I thought we were constantly being told that people rely on Iceland because they can't afford to shop elsewhere, and are unable to get to Peckham?

Blackcurrant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's great to see more active moderation on this

> forum. LOTS of people avoid it because of the

> mindless arguing. Hopefully it will get a bit

> friendlier and more people will want to

> contribute.



?

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not convinced that M&S replacing Iceland and

> Waitrose replacing Co-op really is the "best of

> both worlds".

>

> I thought we were constantly being told that

> people rely on Iceland because they can't afford

> to shop elsewhere, and are unable to get to

> Peckham?


I agree. I think it's good to have a variety of shops to suit all pockets. I for one wish we could still have an Iceland & if I had a magic wand I'd put it where Foxton's is.

I think in this instance, its the size of the premises. Most agents have small office and Foxtons space is one of the few larger units that could actually accommodate a business that needs something that size for operational efficiency and can't open here as a result.


Also, of the various agents Foxton has the worst reputation for aggressive tactics and dishonesty... (just saying)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...