Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Callie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

>

> > They won't be wrong - ED'ers love overpriced

> stuff

> > - it will be a great success.

>

> Um really? It's a myth & quite the opposite I

> think. Very few ED twits like overpriced stuff

> lol. I certainly don't. I do love a good bargain

> though. ps I'm from ED but not a twit :0)



I'd say anyone that has bought property in ED in the past decade doesn't mind paying over the odds for something.

I agree Otta. Property prices are unreasonable across London, especially Zones 1&2. I don't think East Dulwich is remarkable in that matter. Unfortunately anyone buying a property in London these days is paying for something overpriced. I don't think it defines them as people though. It doesn't mean they are a type of person willing to generally pay over the odds for things. In fact, having paid over the odds for property in East Dulwich can sometimes mean having to scrimp and save elsewhere. Of course there are clearly a lot of people doing well in East Dulwich and have the funds to shop where they like and pay extortionate prices for pizza, bread, clothes, whatever. I say fair play to them. In most cases they will have worked hard, earned their money or had a bit of luck we all wish for ourselves along the way.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Indeed. I wasn't making any personal judgements,

> just saying that people are paying over the odds

> for housing. East Dulwich not unique, but it's

> definitely more expensive than most of it's

> surrounding areas for whatever reason.


I am going to hazard a guess it's more expensive than most of it's surrounding areas because more people want to live here than the surrounding areas....


Prices do seem mad, and if I'd left it a couple of years to buy I'd have probably ended up living further out myself. However, with projections showing London's population continuing to grow far faster than we're building properties, plus inflation so low that interest rates aren't going up any time soon, I don't see prices getting any more reasonable any time soon.


As for M&S being overpriced... you're paying for convenience of the various ready prepared foods. If you're working lunatic hours to be able to afford your crazily expensive house in East Dulwich I am guessing you put a high premium on convenience and it still seems cheap compared to your nutty mortgage...

"I am going to hazard a guess it's more expensive than most of it's surrounding areas because more people want to live here than the surrounding areas.... "



Well yes, but I just don't get why.


And I am not dissing East Dulwich, I just don't understand why it's seen as more desirable than other areas close by with better housing stock, better transport links, more trees, better parks.


Basically East Dulwich is a triumph of marketing.


IMO


And long may that continue, means my inheritence will be sweet one day.

I get what you are saying. I can't speak for others, but I pottered around a few different places in SE London looking for somewhere to settle, and when I wandered down Lordship Lane back in 2008, it just felt like somewhere that could be home, which I didn't feel with the likes of Sydenham and Brockley then. And once I'd made friends here via forum drinks etc, I didn't want to leave.


With hindsight, I wish I'd bought in the area of Peckham near the Gowlett / Bellenden etc as my commute would be easier, but I wouldn't move again now unless I was going a whole heap further than that.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Callie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

> >

> > > They won't be wrong - ED'ers love overpriced

> > stuff

> > > - it will be a great success.

> >

> > Um really? It's a myth & quite the opposite I

> > think. Very few ED twits like overpriced stuff

> > lol. I certainly don't. I do love a good

> bargain

> > though. ps I'm from ED but not a twit :0)

>

>

> I'd say anyone that has bought property in ED in

> the past decade doesn't mind paying over the odds

> for something.



well, not me & I don't agree.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And I am not dissing East Dulwich, I just don't

> understand why it's seen as more desirable than

> other areas close by with better housing stock,

> better transport links, more trees, better parks.

>

> Basically East Dulwich is a triumph of marketing.


The high street (i.e. Lordship Lane) is a lot smarter than Peckham, Forest Hill, Camberwell, Sydenham, etc. It has plenty of bars/restaurants and "boutiquey" shops. People like that stuff. You might not be bothered, but plenty of other people are. Just cos you disagree with them.. doesn't make them mugs.

Where nearby has better amenities than ED that is cheaper than ED?


ED has great parks with terrific facilities, is in close proximity to two museums, has lots of shops, restaurants, gyms,pubs, a movie theatre, events and social groups and good primary and secondary education options.



Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I am going to hazard a guess it's more expensive

> than most of it's surrounding areas because more

> people want to live here than the surrounding

> areas.... "

>

>

> Well yes, but I just don't get why.

>

> And I am not dissing East Dulwich, I just don't

> understand why it's seen as more desirable than

> other areas close by with better housing stock,

> better transport links, more trees, better parks.

>

> Basically East Dulwich is a triumph of marketing.

>

> IMO

>

> And long may that continue, means my inheritence

> will be sweet one day.

Didn't think you had. I was curious where this secret gem was so I could move :)


I think ED initially attracted young families-- the smaller housing stock actually made it more affordable than other areas in zone 2. The schools got better which attracted more young families making the area increase in popularity and price. The slightly wealthier demographic attracted independent shops, which then attracted more people. My husband has lived in the area since 2000 (as a student) and me since 2007 (though I visited him here before then) so we've both witnessed the transformation first hand.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Callie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

> >

> > > They won't be wrong - ED'ers love overpriced

> > stuff

> > > - it will be a great success.

> >

> > Um really? It's a myth & quite the opposite I

> > think. Very few ED twits like overpriced stuff

> > lol. I certainly don't. I do love a good

> bargain

> > though. ps I'm from ED but not a twit :0)

>

>

> I'd say anyone that has bought property in ED in

> the past decade doesn't mind paying over the odds

> for something.


Anyone who bought a house in 2005paid over the odds? If only I'd been such a mug

Otta... it basically comes down to the fact that you don't see what's more attractive about ED than Sydenham/Brockley/Penge/etc. But then you're a down-to-earth guy who doesn't care much about restaurants, would rather drink in a proper pub that a "bar", has no interest in organic vegetables or artisan bread, etc. But plenty of people feel differently, there's no right and wrong.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta... it basically comes down to the fact that

> you don't see what's more attractive about ED than

> Sydenham/Brockley/Penge/etc. But then you're a

> down-to-earth guy who doesn't care much about

> restaurants, would rather drink in a proper pub

> that a "bar", has no interest in organic

> vegetables or artisan bread, etc. But plenty of

> people feel differently, there's no right and

> wrong.



Fair point. I'd pay a premium to avoid some of that shite ;-)

yeknomyeknom Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emmeline Pankhurst and Martin Luther King might

> not agree with you.

>

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Things never change for the better..

> >

> > DulwichFox.



I apologise..


I did not know that Emmeline Pankhurst and Martin Luther King were advocates for a M&S on Lordship Lane East Dulwich.


DulwichFox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Looking to borrow a gazebo for birthday party this Saturday, can you help? Julian - 07961463111
    • Whilst I agree, I have been thinking about this recently in relation to some of the other posts on here about anti social behaviour. We are all products of our upbringing - our experiences at home, school and beyond - plus whatever we have inherited genetically which might affect our behaviour (the nature/nurture thing). So in this case, if people haven't been brought up to love and appreciate trees and other wild things, plus as you say they may be deeply unhappy (or have other undiagnosed issues) it's easy to see how they could have ended up doing this. Also, it's possible they had quite low intelligence and didn't really grasp what they were doing and the effect it would have on so many other people. But that's just surmise and possibly completely wrong. From what I've read about it, they seemed to be two mates egging each other on, like two big kids. I'm not for a minute excusing what they did, and it's right they should be punished, but I really hope they might get some sort of rehabilitation in prison (it would  be appropriate to have them do some kind of community service like planting saplings, wouldn't it, or working in woodland conservation). And the same goes for phone robbers and shoplifters (rehabilitation, not planting saplings), though for SOME  shoplifters there might also be other issues at play, not excluding poverty. Sorry Jasonlondon,  I've gone off at a real tangent here, lucky it's in the lounge! Oh oops I've just noticed it isn't. Sorry admin. Oh, and then there's a whole philosophical discussion to be had about free will and determinism ..... 🤣🤣🤣
    • Thanks! I'll find out in a few weeks when I get the results! It was one of those disconcerting things where a disembodied voice keeps booming  at you to breathe in and hold it, then breathe normally. Apart from that it was OK, all completely painless. I imagine there will be quite a few people going from ED, though I presume it covers the whole Southwark area 
    • Two men behind ‘senseless’ felling of Sycamore Gap tree jailed for more than four years Good to see these two jailed today for four years. There’s something deeply disturbing about people who destroy trees—any tree. Whether it’s a centuries-old landmark or a sapling in a quiet park, trees are living beings that offer beauty, shade, and life. The men who cut down the Sycamore Gap tree are a stark example of how far some people will go to lash out at something peaceful and meaningful. People who harm nature like this aren’t just destructive—they are often deeply unhappy. It takes a troubled mind to look at a tree and see something to ruin instead of something to protect. Read more here  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...