Jump to content

Recommended Posts

after having the grave misfortune of being duped into watching england on saturday evening, i don't want them to do well


i will be supporting germany and couldn't give a monkey's what anyone thinks- i'm happy to admit that i'm very much a fair weather england fan- all my football love is for tottenham


the only reason i'll watch the england games is to ensure parker and defoe don't get injured



i think france will surprise a few people


germany, spain, netherlands, france as semi-finalists


england to scrape second in the group and lose to spain in the q-final

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was petty much alarmed by the number of

> Liverpool players featured in yesterday's game.

> Especially as Liverpool had a mediocre season.



Why were you alarmed? It was a friendly, with 6 substituations allowed, and the manager's first chance to have a look at the players as the boss.

Given the dearth of English talent in the top teams it's harldy surprising to be dipping into the mediocre ones for a squad of 22.


Funny that it's liverpool causing such chagrin despite your pleas that you don't have an unhealthy obsession with them, you could have commented on the goalie having spent the whole season in the championship for instance!!

The only thing 'alarming' about the England performance was that it was like all the other pre-tourny performances...


Very Capello-like in their possession footy and in passing it around with an air of calm nonchalance and the usual disintegration into impotence in the second half...


all very sedate and unruffled... as usual...


until the first proper competitive game when they will all hurry the ball around as though it were a grenade with the pin out, pass badly, hit long balls and generally play with the fear, panic and lack of skill that has categorised England's major tournament performances for years.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I was petty much alarmed by the number of

> > Liverpool players featured in yesterday's game.

> > Especially as Liverpool had a mediocre season.

>

>

> Why were you alarmed? It was a friendly, with 6

> substituations allowed, and the manager's first

> chance to have a look at the players as the boss.



one of two warm-up games for a tournament in which he gave games to three players not going to said tournament (including one that didn't even make the stand-by list)


Baffling

I guess if you deeply care it could be alarming.


In my experience the majority of England fan's level of concern has withered from deep to marginal over the last 18 years or so.


Baffling is better, par for the course though so perhaps 'meh' would more accurately sum up reactions to the game.

"You are only as good as your weakest link" said my football coach during my playing days. And so most of these Liverpool players are weak links as far as I'm concern. However I do get this feeling that Carroll would perform well during the tournament. He was unplayable judging by his last two FA match appearances and is peaking at the right time. He would be a key player for England as long as he stays away from booze and women.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you could have

> commented on the goalie having spent the whole

> season in the championship for instance!!


Not quite, Green is a top class keeper as long as he keeps his nerves. Fortunately Joe Hart is world class and will give England the confidence to progress in the tournament.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "You are only as good as your weakness link" said

> my football coach during my playing days.


Mine once said "Ohhhhh you are a bloody disgrace! Hey Baz!*... For missing the target from there you want bloody shooting!"




*He always called me that.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hugo, *yawn*, I've been asked this question before

> and my standard response is I prefer to play

> football rather than supporting a team.



Hmmm... do you still play then? Will you admit who you support when you stop playing? I think that is a bog standard excuse for not coming out and admitting what team you support. Everybody who follows football supports a specific team. I expect you'll be the exception to the rule though.


Anyway..... back to the Euros.


Ummmm...... not much to report really apart from Birmingham City's keeper coming in for the injured Ruddy. What a ruddy shame for him.

Why the buggery fcuk is Jordan Henderson on standby for England if Lampard doesn't make it? He's had a crap season by anyone's standards. Roy Hodgson seems to be having a bit of a love in with Liverpool's players - Johnson, Downing, Gerrard and Carroll have all had very mediocre seasons. Why not Micah Richards, Adam Johnson, Aaron Lennon and Peter Crouch. All of whom have performed better over the same period.

I woldn't want to see Gerrard left out, and I genuinely think this could be Carroll's time to shine. I like Croutch, but I don't think he's really good enough against the top sides. Carroll may not be either, but it's his turn to have a chance.


Can't believe that Micah Richards & Aaron Lennon aren't going!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...