Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Considering the Government?s education minister recently stated missing one day of schooling to attend a global climate change protest was unwise as it can adversely affect a kid?s education, it?s crazy how much time we as a family have already spent since the summer taking our 10 year old child away from her primary, in order to visit potential secondary schools. We are doing this despite many of them are likely to be far beyond viable catchment distances.


Why is it that its so hard to find the max catchment distance to all local secondary schools?


I appreciate that the max distance changes every year due to many factors, but if the system was completely transparent, for example, sharing the last 5 years of catchments for each school, then we would be much better informed and could be much more efficient in making our choices.


Without this information to hand, as parents we have no choice but to hunt around trying to find six schools that we are prepared to contemplate our kids travelling to each day, even though many are likely a waste of time due to unknown catchments.


Renata - can Southwark publish the max catchment distance for all its secondary schools over the past 5 years? It would be just as useful if Lambeth and Lewisham did the same, as we are visiting schools within those boroughs too, so as to have a shortlist to edit down to 6 choices within 40mins of home.


Maybe this catchment information is readily available somewhere, but i can't find it on the web - if so, can someone please put me right!


Thanks very much

Hi HP

I?m really looking for a comprehensive set of data, readily available for all, covering all schools local to East Dulwich. This should exist on Southwark?s schools admissions page. Not piecemeal info buried in messages on a site like EDF.

Again, unless I?ve missed something...

It's because all secondary schools in Southwark are academies. Education authorities have very little oversight or power now that so many schools are academies. Not all schools have the same admissions criteria either - some like Kingsdale are lotteries so it really doesn't matter where you live. Some like Harris Girls ED have more complicated geographical admissions rather than where the crow files. So even if you could get a comprehensive list, you are not comparing like with like.

Hi Scruffy Mummy

I appreciate the switch to academies has allowed freedom of criteria to be set by each school and that a few schools have a lottery system, but most don?t.

The majority of kids have access to a school based solely on distance.

A FOI request would source this info. Just seems a shame it can?t be shared transparently, with the obvious caveats on different criteria.

Some sort of guidance would be helpful as I am not sure how you are supposed to gauge if a school is a viable option. Lewisham has this page https://lewisham.gov.uk/myservices/education/schools/school-admission/applying-to-start-secondary-school/school-admission-distance-map

edbloke. Yes I know- the thread explains why it doesnt exist ...



HP


edbloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi HP

> I?m really looking for a comprehensive set of

> data, readily available for all, covering all

> schools local to East Dulwich. This should exist

> on Southwark?s schools admissions page. Not

> piecemeal info buried in messages on a site like

> EDF.

> Again, unless I?ve missed something...

On the contrary, the Lewisham map is very useful. Thanks Peachpie. If it were to have a drop down option to reveal those catchments over the past say 5 years, then it would also reveal anomalies and trends, helping families make informed decisions.


I?m amazed that all councils aren?t compelled to have this info readily available.

The amount of time parents and kids collectively spend visiting ?unreachable? schools is likely to be shocking.

I'm with you edbloke!


Sadly I'm pretty sure I won't get into Southwark school but I would love to know that! Any excuse that it's because Southwark has Academies and therefore doesn't publish this information seems slightly disingenuous. Bromley have no problem in publishing this information, including the distance for each band where banding is applicable - (see page 44 of the applying for schools download https://www.bromley.gov.uk/downloads/download/849/applying_for_a_school_place ). It?s quite easy to see the schools that have differing admission policies from distance alone. Southwark council seem quite happy for people to waste their time visiting nearby schools which in reality they have no chance of getting into or else they have to gleam admission distance info by searching the east dulwich forum or speaking to neighbours...Not a great experience for parents at what can be a stressful time ( if you?re not stressed I?d hazard a guess that you?re living on the doorstep of a school that admits on distance and that you are happy with).

Wow - Super impressed with Bromley. I think the schools around here are badly behaved and refusing to help the Council. Perhaps what?s needed is action from us in terms of lobbying the heads. But frankly, between the visits, reading of admission policies, banding tests, making sure attendance at banding tests has been recorded properly (long story), general and specialist sports assessments etc... I don't have time for anything else. Indeed I could do with a quiet weekend not monopolised by secondary schools.

Monkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow - Super impressed with Bromley. I think the

> schools around here are badly behaved and refusing

> to help the Council. Perhaps what?s needed is

> action from us in terms of lobbying the heads. But

> frankly, between the visits, reading of admission

> policies, banding tests, making sure attendance at

> banding tests has been recorded properly (long

> story), general and specialist sports assessments

> etc... I don't have time for anything else. Indeed

> I could do with a quiet weekend not monopolised by

> secondary schools.


Agreed! And maybe back to days where you simply went to your loxal secondary ...

Maybe I am missing something here but I think that the Council are responsible for allocating places in line with the school admission policies. So each Head does know the furthest distance for their school's last admission but the council know that information for every school because they make the offer. I am not that impressed by Bromley becasue to my mind that is exactly what they should be producing. Southwark council have this information but for some reason they are not publishing it. I appreciate that from previous threads I can see Renata very engaged and always there to expain the school application process. As a counciller it is also "in her gift" to improve the process. So back to the original post


"Renata - can Southwark publish the max catchment distance for all its secondary schools over the past 5 years? "

To be completely honest here, I?ve had a couple of private messages on this topic from Renata since the opening post but no useful info has been forthcoming.

The only thing I can therefore regrettably conclude is that unlike other councils, Southwark are choosing not to share the historic max catchment distances of local schools as it would so blatantly confirm many resident?s suspicions -?there are huge swathes of the borough, including areas in the heart of East Dulwich /SE22 (despite the arrival of second Charter), where parents haven?t got a chance of securing a preferred school on the distance criteria.

edbloke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be completely honest here, I?ve had a couple of

> private messages on this topic from Renata since

> the opening post but no useful info has been

> forthcoming.

> The only thing I can therefore regrettably

> conclude is that unlike other councils, Southwark

> are choosing not to share the historic max

> catchment distances of local schools as it would

> so blatantly confirm many resident?s suspicions

> -?there are huge swathes of the borough, including

> areas in the heart of East Dulwich /SE22 (despite

> the arrival of second Charter), where parents

> haven?t got a chance of securing a preferred

> school on the distance criteria.


And there might be an organised effort by parents against automatic sibling places if the max distance data is actually published and not shrouded in secrecy, which I doubt the schools or the council would welcome. When EDbloke says the majority of secondary school applicants get a place on distance (after SN, looked-after, children of staff) I would say that a very significant number get a place because their sibling is already a student. Doesn't matter where the household has moved to in the meantime, or if the general "catchment" has shrunk due to popularity, or if the sibling has the same SN that gave the first sibling a place etc etc.

I also don?t understand why no testing based on previous years? data has been run on Harris Girls after it changed its admission policy and nodal point. Frankly given where I am on Dunstans, I don?t think we?ll make it anywhere near. We?re making plans to home educate just to have a back up. We shouldn?t be in this situation. I bloody hate living in Southwark.

Hi Monkey,


We are near to you and we got offered Sydenham School for this year's intake.


Daughter absolutely loves it and has made lots of new friends. Most of them live this side of the school and so walking distance. They get the bus from Upland Rd & Underhill Rd bus stops.


We are still over 100 on the waiting lists for both Charters, but do not think we would change now even if we were offered a place anyway.


Not sure what it was like this year, but the previous year, I understand Harris girls still has 2 vacancies at the start of September after the waiting lists moved things around, so don't give up hope!

Guys, I think we need to review our expectations in terms of getting information on admission distances. Right now i?m just trying to find out from Harris Girls ED what band my daughter is in and you?d think i?m asking them a complicated philosophical question with many possible answers. The band she?s in seems to change each time I call. This is a complete farce.
  • 3 months later...

Just imagine Southwark Council published the past 5 years of data and from this you worked out that your child was so unlikely to get into a Charter school that you don't put them down. Then a neighbour's child gets in. How would you feel?


This is not an impossible scenario if you build into your hypothesis how often people move house and the average number of children per family. At some point, there will be far fewer 11 year olds within a mile of the school because the people living closer no longer have school age children. There is no map predicting when empty nesters will move house.


Alternatively, does it not increase the disappointment if the data reveals that you would successfully get a place, but then you don't? An equally possible scenario.


I really don't see how having this information can help you unless you wish to use it to clutch at straws or for self flagellation.


Instead, listen to advice from your child's school. The head and year 6 teachers know where former pupils have gone and where they live, so can give you guidelines on what you wish to know.


The way forward is to consider the closest schools and those the kids' friends are considering. Chuck in a few wild cards (less favoured but easy to reach + a private option) and sit tight on the waiting list if you do not get what you want. I've known children join Kingsdale half way through the first term, I know a girl who joined Haberdashers at the start of year 8, I know people who have been uneasy about Deptford Green then find their child really thrives there and others that have left DG to go to Sydenham. The place offered in March is often not the end of the story, but you do have to stay calm and pragmatic about things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Reeves says she's in charge and no no's Rayners plan, what happens now?
    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...