Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The 'law changes' are the very welcome ones that try to stop them from ruining vulnerable people's finances and lives with their fixed odds betting terminals. Good riddance, I say.


If there were to be a Waitrose on either of those sites, surely it would on the 'Little Waitrose' model, though as ed_pete points out, still very handy for having John Lewis stuff delivered locally for free.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> If there were to be a Waitrose on either of those

> sites, surely it would on the 'Little Waitrose'

> model, though as ed_pete points out, still very

> handy for having John Lewis stuff delivered

> locally for free.


No need to wait for Waitrose for that - John Lewis are trialling using the Co-Op for click and collect.


https://www.co-operative.coop/media/news-releases/john-lewis-click-and-collect-trial-with-co-op

Melihoople Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wouldn't the old Audi garage site in Dulwich

> village be good for a waitrose.



I think they may prefer a Harrods food hall. Waitrose is too middle class for the upper class dwellers of Dulwich Village.

Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It would appear the train station William Hill

> site is the preferred choice for Waitrose. But we

> shall see.

>

> Louisa.


Had a feeling this would be the case. The one on Lordship Lane looks too small for even a 'small' Waitrose.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Great to wear shopping in Waitrose Fox

> 👏

>

>

> Waitrose Fox ..... That's how I'm always going to

> think of him now.


Back in the house maxxi, or just visitin??

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Seabag Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Great to wear shopping in Waitrose Fox

> > 👏

> >

> >

> > Waitrose Fox ..... That's how I'm always going

> to

> > think of him now.

>

> Back in the house maxxi, or just visitin??


Visiting status awaiting confirmation on EDEXIT negotiations... looking promising

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?m hoping Harvey Nichols opens in Dulwich, once

> the Dulwich Picture Galley agree to move out and

> let the set up shop there.


In the 1980s when my kids were small I used to knit for a designer who supplied Harvey Nicks. They had a 150% mark up on the goods she sold them. One day I decided to calculate my rate of hourly pay....2p an hour, yes, 2p per hour.. and I was by no means a slow knitter.In order to make any money the designer- a young Scots girl who lived in a 2 bedroomed flat in Brixton, had to purchase the wool in such bulk that it filled an entire room.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> News to me that the ED Co-op is trialling John

> Lewis click and collect!

>

> I shall investigate!


The Camberwell coop is also doing this now. Exciting times, being 10 mins walk away from a JLP collection point rather than a 20 min bus ride away!

seemster Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > News to me that the ED Co-op is trialling John

> > Lewis click and collect!

> >

> > I shall investigate!

>

> The Camberwell coop is also doing this now.

> Exciting times, being 10 mins walk away from a JLP

> collection point rather than a 20 min bus ride

> away!



Except I stupidly assumed it would be free. But it isn't :(

Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It would appear the train station William Hill

> site is the preferred choice for Waitrose. But we

> shall see.

>

> Louisa.


Still up to this Louisa? Bit early for Trick or Treat. And surely you must be getting bored? 0.5 / 10

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...