Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Good for him. Ties them into the tax / benefits / health care systems. Integration into society rather than discrimination and rejection.


These are kids who were brought by their parents, grew up American without more than hearsay contact with their parents' cultures (well, they couldn't exactly go "home" summers to visit their nan, could they?)... acknowledge that they're Yanks and embrace them as such. Points up the Republicans for the spiteful racists that they are.

I don't understand one of the criteria


They are currently in school, have graduated from high school, have obtained a general education development certificate, or are honorably discharged veterans of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States;


Does the USA really have illegal immigrants in the armed forces??

  • 2 weeks later...

Alex K Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good for him. Ties them into the tax / benefits /

> health care systems. Integration into society

> rather than discrimination and rejection.

>

> These are kids who were brought by their parents,

> grew up American without more than hearsay contact

> with their parents' cultures (well, they couldn't

> exactly go "home" summers to visit their nan,

> could they?)... acknowledge that they're Yanks

> and embrace them as such. Points up the

> Republicans for the spiteful racists that they

> are.


This is ignorant, partisan rhetoric. Although neither side of the political spectrum enjoys a monopoly on racism, the Democrats have had a disproportionate number of senators exposed as clansmen compared to the RepublicansSen. R Byrd (who recieved a state funeral) being a notable example

Regardless of where they come from, Democrats are, statistically, more likely to harbour racist tendancies than the right-wing. Their ideology encourages this, whereas classical liberals of old, like JFK, were more centrist than Obama's administration, who lean further left than their predecessors. With any luck we'll see a GOP victory this year.

saleem Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Regardless of where they come from, Democrats are, statistically, more likely to harbour racist

> tendancies than the right-wing. Their ideology encourages this, whereas classical liberals of

> old, like JFK, were more centrist than Obama's administration, who lean further left than their

> predecessors. With any luck we'll see a GOP victory this year.


Since it is 'statistically' I assume you can provide a link to said statistics?

saleem Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Regardless of where they come from, Democrats are,

> statistically, more likely to harbour racist

> tendancies than the right-wing. Their ideology

> encourages this, whereas classical liberals of

> old, like JFK, were more centrist than Obama's

> administration, who lean further left than their

> predecessors. With any luck we'll see a GOP

> victory this year.


I think you need to expand on this idea, its a paradigm too far for me & Ive not come across it outside the construct of Southern Democrats bludz.

There are no statistics to back this up. Yes the Republican party was founded with the abolition of slavery as one of it's core aims and yes the Southern Democrats were at the heart of the formation of the Ku Klux Klan but that doesn't mean that the democrats today harbour any more racism within their ranks than the Republicans. Pretty much all main parties in the US are right wing. There's no equivalent for example to the Labour Party, not in a historical or modern day form. American politicians are a product of the culture they grow up in just like anyone else. American culture per se is right wing.
No but racism within politics is often labelled as a right wing view. The point I was making is that culture has far more to do with racism than polical allegiance (i.e. the Souhern Democrats formed the Ku Klux Klan because they were southerners more than because they were democrats).

http://www.game-warden.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif


Ever since LBJ enacted Affirmative Action the DNC has effectively locked the African American mindset into the liberal plantation. Liberal policies since JFK's more centrist administration have sought to affirm and foster a dependance and entitlement mentality among minorities i.e - keep them dependent on our 'benevolence' and 'good will' and before they know it they won't know what to do without us. It's worked a charm, too. 90% of African Americans voted for Pres. Obama. Mainly because he's black, which is a natural inclination, but also because he promised to raise taxes i.e - more money being funnelled into welfare, which African Americans are disproportionately dependent on. They didn't take any notice of same sex marriage legislation proposed by the Obama administration, or the DADT law in the military being lifted which is diametrically opposed to the deep Christian background the majority of black families in the U.S. are rooted in. That was overridden by the opportunity to get more for less (at the expense of hard-working Americans, regardless of colour or creed). They won votes on a promise of more tax Dollars going into funding welfare programmes, which minorities often depend on. Not to mention the victim mentality that's been pounded into the minds of African Americans by successive liberal administrations and overbearing, paternalist white liberals who don't consider the African Americans capable of looking after themselves. A reflection of that can be found in various forms among the British left-wing.


All of the above keeps the African American who buys into the liberal-progressive propaganda of today's DNC a slave on th eliberal plantation. Dependence on that level should be strongly discouraged at every corner.

Saleem - please tell me what you have posted is a wind up or some kind of C&P mash up - its the most hateful, most cynical aspects of M.X / panthers / Cleaver / Newton rolled into one and vomited onto the pavemets of LordShip Lane for all to step around.

Don't think that was the point was it?


"Food stamp recipients are 37.2 percent Black and 46.2 percent White. Medicaid benefits are paid to 27.5 percent Black recipients compared to 48.5 percent White clients."


Think it was just tired bullshit from a bullshitter?

"US government writes retirement and disability benefit checks to 35.4 million recipients of whom 88.7 percent are White and 9.6 percent are Black."


Come on Nazi boy, let's see you knock the welfare figures...


I'm going to let you guess for a leeeedle bit, and then I'm going to spank you with them ;-)


How high are you going to hang yourself from before you discover that the biggest recipients of welfare are whitey boyz??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...