Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's almost as if labour DON'T want to win the

> election with their manifesto and policies

>

> After all it took them long enough to agree to one

> 🤓


No Manifesto out yet for Labour or Tories


I wouldn't be surprised if the Labour Manifesto is quite well done (as in 2017)

Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In the Camberwell and Peckham constituency, the

> Workers Revolutionary Party will be standing. If I

> could flip constituencies to vote for them, I would.


Dread to think what polling figures you're inventing to support that intention.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What difference does it make to be able to See /

> Read ANY Manifesto?

>

> Most Manifestos (From any Party)are Full of

> unachievable Empty Promises...

>



Surely manifestos say (or should say) how they are going to achieve their promises?


Including where they are going to get the money from to fund said promises?

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what do you base your vote on?...


http://www.sportingcollectibles.com/adagdt/ag36941spinner.jpg


I doubt I shall be voting this time. What is the point ?

People who do not get their own way will demanding a recount..

Blocking roads in central London and throwing their Toys out of their prams.

True Democracy in this country is dead.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So what do you base your vote on?...

>

> http://www.sportingcollectibles.com/adagdt/ag36941

> spinner.jpg

>

> I doubt I shall be voting this time. What is the

> point ?

> People who do not get their own way will demanding

> a recount..

> Blocking roads in central London and throwing

> their Toys out of their prams.

> True Democracy in this country is dead.


Well it is almost December and time for the Grinch. True democracy is not dead. You live in a liberal, democratic country with a relatively free press and have a vote. People died for this right and queue round the block in other countries to use theirs at personal risk. Certainly we are living through unique and troubling times but the repercussions after this election will massively affect everybody for the forseeable future. If you don't vote you will not have made your own contribution and almost certainly won't be listened to on anything by anybody by choosing to opt out. Exercise your vote.

TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue , it's obvious how they are going to fund it

> (regardless of party) squeeze stones till they

> bleed



Well, it depends on which stones they squeeze, doesn't it?


I would prefer they were rich stones, who can afford to lose 99% of their money and still be very rich indeed.


I would prefer that they weren't poor stones, who can ill afford to lose any more than the Tories have already squeezed out of them.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > I doubt I shall be voting this time. What is

> the

> > point ?

>

>

> People have died to fight for your right to live

> in a free country and to vote.


That's right.. I voted for Blair and what did he do ?

He sent British Troops to die in Iraq in an 'Illegal' war.


Thatcher sent Thousands to fight in The Falklands 7,000 miles away many were killed,


What are you actually voting for ??


Voting is not compulsory in the UK. Only in dictatorships. Is that what you want ??


Sorry.. Did not mean to send as a PM.

"That's right.. I voted for Blair and what did he do ?

He sent British Troops to die in Iraq in an 'Illegal' war."


Not to support the war in anyway but


Majority of uk voters were behind that war

after the war they subsequently voted him back in again


A democracy doesn't function by wondering how any single voter thinks - its partly a summary of how everyone thinks

DulwichFox Wrote:

--------------------------------------------------

> ---------------------------------------------

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > ----

>

> Voting is not compulsory in the UK. Only in

> dictatorships. Is that what you want ??

>


Huh?.....like those well known dictatorships of Australia, Belgium, and switzerland? (To name just a few)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Voting is not compulsory in the UK. Only in

> dictatorships. Is that what you want ??

>



I stand to be corrected, but I thought the point about voting in dictatorships is not that voting is compulsory (although I'm sure it is), but that you are told who/what to vote for, and that they make very certain that you do vote that way.


I would be all in favour of compulsory voting in this country (with possibly some sort of get-out as for conscientious objectors in the war? I admit that I have not thought this through at all :)) )


But the whole voting system needs to be overhauled first.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Labour meanwhile are offering all public sector

> workers a 5% pay rise come April 2020. I liked

> their 2017 manifesto but can we really afford that

> as it seems a lot (or is there some small print).

>

> Fully costed though apparently.



Perhaps by making billionaire tax avoiders pay up??


Those who haven't left the country to live in luxury elsewhere, of course.

"Fully costed"... as Labour keep telling us. Except their massive re-nationalisation scheme will involve...


- Issuing tens, or hundreds of billions of pounds worth of bonds

- Buying shares at inflated rates, either due to typical takeover premiums, or market shock, or both

- Relying on these companies to return almost perpetual profit to meet bond repayments, impeding reinvestment

- Depreciating assets due to natural decline of some sectors (e.g. mail)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...