Jump to content

Cross passenger on the 0703hrs train from East Dulwich to London Bridge (Lounged)


Recommended Posts

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, re-nationalise it!


CWALD! We agree! See I'm not all bad. I think some shareholders might not like us though.


Jeremy - really? Are you serious? I could see it working on very short routes where people travel only a few stops but anything longer and journeys would be exhausting. Not to mention the elderly, those with children, etc.

Commuting is hell - other people are hell (well those standing too close to me are).


If I could earn the same in ED as I do in the West End (or even just a bit less) I'd jump at the chance - it would improve my standard of living considerably.


(Puts hands down)

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hands ups if you are in an office which you had to

> commute to and you could just as easily be doing

> your job from a business centre based in ED.

>

> Ok hands down now people are looking.


[Puts hand up]


Now, you try telling my boss that!

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy - really? Are you serious? I could see it

> working on very short routes where people travel

> only a few stops but anything longer and journeys

> would be exhausting. Not to mention the elderly,

> those with children, etc.


I wasn't being totally serious. But there more I think about the idea, the more I like it. Fold down seats could be provided, which are locked shut during peak hours. The elderly could have a separate compartment with floral armchairs and free cakes... give us all something to look forward to in a few years time.

So is the idea suggested by ???? (Loadsamoney?)to meet up with burning torches and pitchforks to sort out this uppity chav still a goer or not?

Debag the oik I say, that'll teach him some manners. It's what Boris Johnson would do.

Not at all Sean, though if there's any sort of prize attached to such a feat then I'll happily accept it. Just a combination of being off work sick, having a sleepless night and being new to the board.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> great name too btw. If you are sick tho can I

> assume you won't be making an appearance tonight?



Thanks and I like the name Sean too.


How the compliments flow when the quality meet as Brendan Behan once wrote. Though it was ironic when he wrote it, but not when I did.


Cheers, have a good Burns night.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...