Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks for posting everyone, with your experiences.


Our holiday was a camping sumer camp, so lots of communal activities and meals at the Yarner Trust in Devon.


Alas, they have told me (after much thought) that we can not attend. It's a shame as I was really looking forward to our holiday.


So we will have to wait and see if DD1 does develop the dreaded rash. Apparently it is much worse for siblings?

Chickenpox is spread by coughs, sneezes and contact so keeping towels separate won't help I'm afraid.


There is no reason why a sibling would get it worse though so I wouldn't worry unduly


I found running a bath through a sock full of porridge oats so helped immensely and my children had three or four warm baths a day .. Never used calamine as it can, for some, make it it itchier as it dries


Hope that helps

My eldest had it then middle child had it 2 weeks after first had recovered. Baby got it a week after that.


The first had it badly, it was barely noticeable with the second and the baby had it moderately.


I guess there are no rules.


Best tips I picked up on the net were to use: aveeno bath oil and aqueous cream.

Your younger daughter would have been most contagious 2-3 days before her spots appeared and then up until they crusted over.


Your older daughter will probably have chickenpox in 10-14 days time but then again she might not.


I remember my eldest had it just before breaking up from school for Xmas one year. Then the second eldest went down with it and then my youngest after the New Year.

Curmudgeon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Chickenpox is spread by coughs, sneezes and

> contact so keeping towels separate won't help I'm

> afraid.

>

> There is no reason why a sibling would get it

> worse though so I wouldn't worry unduly

>


The response of a sibling to the virus can be less/worse/same, depending on several factors including: whether siblings have been infected with the same strain of the virus; individual immune response; other health issues for example exzema; etc.


It's often noted that primary infection with chicken pox is less severe in younger children compared to older children or adults; however there are many exceptions to this. Complications and severe reactions can and do develop in young children.


Infants (0-6mo) are a special case. Chickenpox infections in infants is a serious medical condition, which should be closely managed by physicians.


This page is a good, short read: http://www.askdrsears.com/topics/childhood-illnesses/chicken-pox .


Depending on which studies you read, Chickenpox vaccine given 3-5 days post exposure to a contagious individual (ie, household/sibling exposure/school exposure, etc), can prevent viral infection or significantly reduce viral symptoms. Here's an example: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0011216/.

  • 2 weeks later...

echo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes! My eldest has now got the pox, exactly 2

> weeks after her little sister...



ahem! you don't really mean that do you? :-)

'pox' on its own, without a qualifier such as 'chicken-' or 'small-' or 'cow-', usually means syphilis...


Little children seem to suffer much less with chicken pox than their older siblings. I found that emollients worked better to reduce itchiness than witch hazel and other standard remedies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It is just a witch hunt. The estate agent has taken responsibility. FFS leave the poor woman alone.
    • As said, why are you not eating humble pie for a non-story? I expect that scores of landlords are unaware or made mistakes in this territory.  And this is not just the Chancellor but a married couple.  It feels like you and others are taking joy in demonising her. The only question would be is the house suitable for renting out?  I expect it is, and if not that is up to Southwark to take action rather than keyboard warriors.  The only surprises are the expense of licensing - surely time for a thread on "is licensing a money maker for local authorities?".  I'm being facetious.  And that the cost of rental, which feels fairly reasonable based on this area. By all means go after rogue landlords.  Be my guest.  I was horrified to see some of the properties rented in London and beyond by family members.  Not all bad. Oh and another question.  Haven't I got better things to do than comment on this 'no story here' thread?  😁
    • Week 10 fixtures...   Saturday 1st November Brighton & Hove Albion v Leeds United Burnley v Arsenal Crystal Palace v Brentford  Fulham v Wolverhampton Wanderers Nottingham Forest v Manchester United Tottenham Hotspur v Chelsea Liverpool v Aston Villa   Sunday 2nd November West Ham United v Newcastle United Manchester City v AFC Bournemouth   Monday 3rd November Sunderland v Everton
    • Can you let me know if you see this again today? I'll investigate if so.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...