Jump to content

Recommended Posts

From the Lib Dem councillors for ED


"[in] 2006 East Dulwich has 99.72 crime per thousand population. During 2007 this dropped to 86.16 crimes per thousand. This means we?ve gone from being the 3rd to 2nd best ward for lowest reported crime levels in Southwark."


http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2008/01/28/east-dulwich-crime/

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2499-crime-rate-down-in-ed/
Share on other sites

Where are the raw data?


I don't know which data the Lib Dems or the OP are referring to, but there's some useful stuff at the Neighbourhood Statistics website which shows a downwards trend of certain notifiable offences such as Violence against the Person.


I don't know enough about the subject to understand if this reflects a drop in crime (as claimed) or a drop in the number of offences that count as "notifiable" for these purposes:


http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=3&b=276770&c=SE22+0AQ&d=13&e=3&g=345119&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&p=8&q=1&r=0&s=1201536265921&enc=1&dsFamilyId=904

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

...

> Where are the raw data?


You could try calling the Home Office Direct Communications Unit on 020 7035 484 or look at the Home Office Research & Statistics website, http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/crimeew0607.html, that may help.

James Barber is, according to his blog, interpreting the Met data,


The Met have "mislaid" the relevant data:


"The Crime Figures pages are currently unavailable due to technical problems. We are working to resolve these and will restore access to the Crime Figures website as soon as possible."

For clarity I found the data on the Metropolitan Police website:


http://www.met.police.uk/crimestatistics/


I saved the data as an excel file and spent Sunday evening reviewing what I found.

The three East Dulwich cllrs Richard Thomas, Jonathan Mitchel and myself will feed the stats into conversations with the East Dulwich Safer Neighbourhood Team and what they think we need to help find money for to help further reduce crime levels.

gerry Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do the current crime figures reflect the numbers

> of school children who get mugged on a daily basis

> coming home from school? Most parents report them,

> but does it depend on what is stolen from them? If

> money is stolen and not a mobile phone, is this

> part of the statistics?


How would that work statistically when it is a fellow school pupil that's guilty of the "mugging" and would that indeed relfect or change statistics on bullying?


How accurate are the statistics in the first place? :|

Gizzy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Kford,

>

> Cant really see the point as there is little to

> nothing i can tell them other then it must have

> happened on Friday or Saturday night. If it

> happens again im going to sell the bloody car!

>

> Giz


Giz, a policeman once told me that one should report every crime, however small and however remote the chances of detection. It stops politicians claiming the crime rates are down and means the police can apply for more resources and manpower. (tu)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...