Jump to content

Recommended Posts

From the Lib Dem councillors for ED


"[in] 2006 East Dulwich has 99.72 crime per thousand population. During 2007 this dropped to 86.16 crimes per thousand. This means we?ve gone from being the 3rd to 2nd best ward for lowest reported crime levels in Southwark."


http://jamesbarber.mycouncillor.org.uk/2008/01/28/east-dulwich-crime/

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2499-crime-rate-down-in-ed/
Share on other sites

Where are the raw data?


I don't know which data the Lib Dems or the OP are referring to, but there's some useful stuff at the Neighbourhood Statistics website which shows a downwards trend of certain notifiable offences such as Violence against the Person.


I don't know enough about the subject to understand if this reflects a drop in crime (as claimed) or a drop in the number of offences that count as "notifiable" for these purposes:


http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=3&b=276770&c=SE22+0AQ&d=13&e=3&g=345119&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&p=8&q=1&r=0&s=1201536265921&enc=1&dsFamilyId=904

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

...

> Where are the raw data?


You could try calling the Home Office Direct Communications Unit on 020 7035 484 or look at the Home Office Research & Statistics website, http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/crimeew0607.html, that may help.

James Barber is, according to his blog, interpreting the Met data,


The Met have "mislaid" the relevant data:


"The Crime Figures pages are currently unavailable due to technical problems. We are working to resolve these and will restore access to the Crime Figures website as soon as possible."

For clarity I found the data on the Metropolitan Police website:


http://www.met.police.uk/crimestatistics/


I saved the data as an excel file and spent Sunday evening reviewing what I found.

The three East Dulwich cllrs Richard Thomas, Jonathan Mitchel and myself will feed the stats into conversations with the East Dulwich Safer Neighbourhood Team and what they think we need to help find money for to help further reduce crime levels.

gerry Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do the current crime figures reflect the numbers

> of school children who get mugged on a daily basis

> coming home from school? Most parents report them,

> but does it depend on what is stolen from them? If

> money is stolen and not a mobile phone, is this

> part of the statistics?


How would that work statistically when it is a fellow school pupil that's guilty of the "mugging" and would that indeed relfect or change statistics on bullying?


How accurate are the statistics in the first place? :|

Gizzy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi Kford,

>

> Cant really see the point as there is little to

> nothing i can tell them other then it must have

> happened on Friday or Saturday night. If it

> happens again im going to sell the bloody car!

>

> Giz


Giz, a policeman once told me that one should report every crime, however small and however remote the chances of detection. It stops politicians claiming the crime rates are down and means the police can apply for more resources and manpower. (tu)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...