Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It?s unlikely to help. Save your money and keep the supplies open for those who need them most. They - surgical masks - don?t filter out the virus, they get dirty quickly, people rarely dispose of them correctly, they don?t cover the eyes and they?re notoriously ill fitting which means that any aerosolised virus can still reach the nose and mouth. The virus doesn?t hang around in the air so walking through the streets with one on is not of use (unless you come across a person who sneezes on you at a two metre distance and even then the mask is unlikely to help.)

I believe I read that a study suggests that the virus can reside in the air for quite some time, and that it needn?t have arrived in the air by virtue of a sneeze or cough - simply breathing is enough. I recall the study being American and have provided a link below from Science Journal.


https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-19-breathing-talking-enough-spread-airborne/amp


Maybe we should all be trying to cover our mouths and noses to help lessen the spread afterall...

Each time I?ve been in Kristals in Nunhead recently they?ve been selling paper surgical masks and what look to be FFP3 masks for ?1.49 and ?5.99 each respectively. I don?t object to people making a modest profit reselling things like this but boxes of 50 surgical masks were selling for under ?10 on eBay at the end of January . Kristals are also selling the tiny bottles of hand sanitiser for ?4.99 each.

Well if ebay are cheaper, you can buy the items there.


And when I went in on Thursday to buy a couple of things from Krystal, I noticed they had a large sign in the window explaining the costings, which you have also no doubt seen.


I'm sorry, but I tire of people slating a local retailer who is trying to make a living, are operating in difficult circumstances, go beyond expectations, are offering additional services i.e. the Post Office counter and are a community pharmacy. I have always found the staff to be accommodating, helpful, considerate, kind, thoughtful and happy recommend them to others to use.


I suggest you try the likes of Day Lewis pharmacy, or Boots or Morrisons and then come to a conclusion. The choice is yours.


If you think the items you mention are expensive, nothing forces you to buy them from Krystals. In fact soap and hot water are equally as good as sanitiser. And regarding masks, the Government stated this afternoon they don't recommend using them.

It's really a question of who deserves them more. There's a global shortage of all PPE and there are people working in hospitals and other settings worldwide who are in constant danger and can't always get hold of it. They should be able to get access to masks before you. If they're to be of any real use, you'd have to replace them several times a day, fit them correctly and exercise the kind of clinical bodily hygiene that they carry out in operating theatres.


Wearing one at the current time not only deprives key individuals of important kit but also sends a very visible message to the entire community that you think you're more important than hospital workers. If you're vulnerable or ill you shouldn't be out anyway and if you aren't either of these, you should be far enough away from others not to gain any significant benefit from having one.

Okay, the question to ask is what can a mask do to stop virus from transmitting? If you are sneezing or coughing, a mask will stop 80% of any viral material from traveling the distance required to infect another within 2 meters of you. But if you are not infected, a mask does not protect you from the virus if someone coughs on you. Front line medical staff need full PPE for a reason. A surgical mask is not enough. So if you have any cough, wear a mask. Otherwise, leave the production of protective material to providing the higher level PPE that front line staff really need.

worldwiser Wrote:


> Wearing one at the current time not only deprives

> key individuals of important kit but also sends a

> very visible message to the entire community that

> you think you're more important than hospital

> workers.


You can think that if you wish, I don't. I've been out twice in three weeks in the early morning to buy some groceries. I didn't like doing it but I was glad I wore a mask.


If you're vulnerable or ill you shouldn't

> be out anyway and if you aren't either of these,

> you should be far enough away from others not to

> gain any significant benefit from having one.


What about other people? You can't control what they do. You must know that?

dbboy Wrote:


And regarding masks, the Government

> stated this afternoon they don't recommend using

> them.


I'd like to know why? At the very least they stop you from inadvertently touching your face. I believe the US has told everyone they have to wear a mask. Not saying that government has managed this crisis well though.

I ordered one the other day after reading that the WHO was going to review its advice on mask wearing. I haven't seen any update on that yet. I rarely go outside, but I thought it is better to have one just in case it becomes necessary. I ordered one for my elderly mother as well as she goes shopping occasionally.

Thank you all for your thoughts. Certainly those who are treating and close to the unfortunate patients, cleaners etc etc etc are top priority. I'm not especially impressed with any of the governments tardy advice. Apart from staying indoors. I think if we are shown videos of groups of people on the beaches, enjoying a picnic in the sunshine in the parks this weekend. If they cant comprehend what staying indoors means and don't understand the reason for staying indoors. They should be shot. Harsh I know but who needs them.


Be Safe, Be Happy


Muser

The best thing is to limit going outside and to keep one?s distance. Nobody is exempt from this virus and only a small number of people are being told they are key to society and therefore can be granted ?privileges? (though these are only to allow them to work, sometimes putting them in more danger). Stay indoors for the vast majority of the day and keep well apart from others when/if you go out for a very short time.


Wearing a flimsy mask doesn?t allow you special privileges or powers. It could give you a false sense of security. Just stay inside and wash your hands after you?ve been out for your short foray. That?s what I?ve done for some twenty days so I?m not saying one thing and doing another. Donning a mouth cover really doesn?t give anyone a special pass.

It's still socially unacceptable for British people to wear masks, even though the evidence for benefit is overwhelming. The mask fiasco reminds me of the "keep calm and carry on" attitude most people had back in february, when anyone taking any kind of defensive action was told "there's no point panicking".


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/04/why-wear-a-mask-may-be-our-best-weapon-to-stop-coronavirus?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_WhatsApp


"A Food and Drug Administration analysis of the flu estimates that if 50% of the population uses a mask, virus transmission is reduced by half. If 80% of the population uses a mask, the virus is ?essentially eliminated?."

So why don't you email the Govt?


Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dbboy Wrote:

>

> And regarding masks, the Government

> > stated this afternoon they don't recommend

> using

> > them.

>

> I'd like to know why? At the very least they stop

> you from inadvertently touching your face. I

> believe the US has told everyone they have to wear

> a mask. Not saying that government has managed

> this crisis well though.


And if people don't Understand the instruction to stay indoors, when the police act and then the Govt impose more restrictive controls' you'll know why.

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So why don't you email the Govt?

>

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > dbboy Wrote:

> >

> > And regarding masks, the Government

> > > stated this afternoon they don't recommend

> > using

> > > them.

> >

> > I'd like to know why? At the very least they

> stop

> > you from inadvertently touching your face. I

> > believe the US has told everyone they have to

> wear

> > a mask. Not saying that government has managed

> > this crisis well though.

>

> And if people don't Understand the instruction to

> stay indoors, when the police act and then the

> Govt impose more restrictive controls' you'll know

> why.


I expect after this week-end there's every likelihood more restrictive controls will be introduced. I don't understand the connection between that, and why it would explain the govt. advice not to wear masks. What am I missing?

This is the one time I wish I could do more than sew buttons


If a mask helps it helps the people around you I think. Mind when I paid my first visit to the local Tesco in 10 days everyone was NOT coughing at all - no coughs no clearing of the throat - we're all still breathing though - and I even try to keep talking to a minimum if I have to talk even from 2m away.


ANyway heres the WHO page https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/when-and-how-to-use-masks

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well if ebay are cheaper, you can buy the items

> there.

>

> And when I went in on Thursday to buy a couple of

> things from Krystal, I noticed they had a large

> sign in the window explaining the costings, which

> you have also no doubt seen.

>

> I'm sorry, but I tire of people slating a local

> retailer who is trying to make a living, are

> operating in difficult circumstances, go beyond

> expectations, are offering additional services

> i.e. the Post Office counter and are a community

> pharmacy. I have always found the staff to be

> accommodating, helpful, considerate, kind,

> thoughtful and happy recommend them to others to

> use.

>

> I suggest you try the likes of Day Lewis pharmacy,

> or Boots or Morrisons and then come to a

> conclusion. The choice is yours.

>

> If you think the items you mention are expensive,

> nothing forces you to buy them from Krystals. In

> fact soap and hot water are equally as good as

> sanitiser. And regarding masks, the Government

> stated this afternoon they don't recommend using

> them.


I have used Kristals for many years, and in almost all respects, I have nothing but praise for them and the service they provide. But I really think they are taking advantage of customers who don't know where else to get masks from with the amount they're charging. Even last night you could still buy a box of 50 surgical masks for under ?20 on eBay, so there isn't any excuse for charging so much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...