Jump to content

Recommended Posts

East of Lordship Lane is definitely bearing the brunt of the CPZ fallout. Possibly from the West Peckham CPZ too now that the schools in that zone are back.


I don't think it will be long before the clamour for an extension will whelm the council into a new consultation.

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why Rockets, they?re all cycling in from Kent

> now😉



I hope some of them are. Like I've done, they will find out how much nicer it is than driving in. And if they keep it up they are likely to live longer too.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> East of Lordship Lane is definitely bearing the

> brunt of the CPZ fallout. Possibly from the West

> Peckham CPZ too now that the schools in that zone

> are back.

>

> I don't think it will be long before the clamour

> for an extension will whelm the council into a new

> consultation.


Perhaps experiencing what those of us West of Lordship Lane went through. Though I'd guess that the CPZ has deterred some from using their car at all. The CPZ has been a massive improvement in Matham Grove.

Possibly. The residents of Dulwich Village / North Dulwich and Denmark Hill were to blame for your woes when they caved in / begged for a CPZ.


The council have very successfully played divide and conquer on the residents to get their pay to park schemes in across the whole borough.

Wow, is that really true? Presumably Melbourne residents doing this were probably against CPZ? Cannot believe anyone would vote in all day CPZ and then go and park for free in a neighbouring non CPZ street. However, if this is happening in any numbers it makes you wonder if it was a majority who wanted CPZ in Melbourne Grove?

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But your empathising with my comment laying the

> blame squarely on those who clamoured for a CPZ,

> some of whom are now parking in the CPZ free

> streets away from their homes!


I wasn't agreeing with your comment, far from it. I was empathising with residents East of LL who you claim are now experiencing their streets suffocated with cars and don't have a CPZ to alleviate the problem.

Rockets Wrote:

>

> Interesting isn't it that time limited CPZs have

> been very effective in areas like Herne Hill in

> deterring commuters yet protecting the local

> community shops and Southwark opted for the all

> day option. Read into that what you will!


The zone around East Dulwich station is 11-1, West Peckham is 9-11. Both were put in by Southwark as well as the East Dulwich CPZ. The roads closest to the shops in Herne Hill have longer hours, the two hour restriction is a few roads further away. Whoever decided the hours had to look at the bigger picture

Is it a very small zone around East Dulwich station that is two hours because the restrictions that I saw on East Dulwich Grove are definitely all day?


The Stradella Road, Half Moon Lane, Winterbrook etc. restrictions (the roads closest to the shops and station in Herne Hill) are 2 hours only - or at least they were the last time I was there a couple of weeks ago.

Rockets


Zone Q is the other side of East Dulwich station and was the first of the East Dulwich zones to be put in. - East Dulwich Grove is in the latest zone. Zone Q went in after 4 consultations and the parking had got worse. We said no to the first 3 consultations but when the fourth came out it was needed.


I thought Stradella Road was all day, guess there is a set of bays at the end that I saw the sign for that?s all day. The zone the other side of the bridge opposite Brockwell Park is all day. So Lambeth also have a two hour zone one side of the station and an all day zone the other. Like the zones around East Dulwich there is a mix of a station, residents and businesses so guess there is something that means a two hour zone isn?t going to work in some areas.

> So Lambeth also have a two hour zone one side of the station and an all day zone the other.


A minor point, but Stradella Road is in Southwark - the border is at the Half Moon pub and then along Herne Hill and Denmark Hill roads.


The introduction of Lambeth's parking zones did make parking much more difficult across the N Dulwich triangle, causing many residents to change their minds and back the CPZ when it was proposed for the second time. But as far as I know, the 2 hr / all day difference between neighbouring zones has no noticeable or wide effect in this area .

N dulwich northerner


I?d not realised about the borough boundary.


There is a difference as a visitor to the area looking for parking - isn?t one of the things a CPZ is meant to do to improve parking availability for residents? It did near us. When I need to make a daytime visit to the Herne Hill area there is a choice. You have to find a bay you can pay in that is free in the all day zone or you time your visit and park in the two hour zone outside of the hours it operates. For residents its only other residents and their visitors parking in the all day zone.


I chose to time my visit for free parking and went to a couple of shops I wouldn?t have if I?d parked in the all day zone which was closest to where I was going.

?For residents its only other residents and their visitors parking in the all day zone?.


Not always the case as commuters may park and pay online/via telephone from work for the two hour parking window. Fortunately not all bays are shared use to prevent this problem.




AylwardS Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> N dulwich northerner

>

> I?d not realised about the borough boundary.

>

> There is a difference as a visitor to the area

> looking for parking - isn?t one of the things a

> CPZ is meant to do to improve parking availability

> for residents? It did near us. When I need to make

> a daytime visit to the Herne Hill area there is a

> choice. You have to find a bay you can pay in that

> is free in the all day zone or you time your visit

> and park in the two hour zone outside of the

> hours it operates. For residents its only other

> residents and their visitors parking in the all

> day zone.

>

> I chose to time my visit for free parking and went

> to a couple of shops I wouldn?t have if I?d parked

> in the all day zone which was closest to where I

> was going.

AylwardS Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> N dulwich northerner

> There is a difference as a visitor to the area

> looking for parking - isn?t one of the things a

> CPZ is meant to do to improve parking availability

> for residents? It did near us.


It certainly did here too.


> I chose to time my visit for free parking and went

> to a couple of shops I wouldn?t have if I?d parked

> in the all day zone which was closest to where I

> was going.


It's flexibility that seems to have no downside. There isn't a big influx during when parking is free, but outsiders can still schedule visits like the daughter who calls round to care for her mum, people who have to collect kids from school or childcare, or whatever. The two hour CPZ is a balanced, practical solution for this area.

  • 5 months later...

In case of interest- an overview of the council's proposed timetable to roll out CPZs to remaining areas of Southwark is on the agenda for next week's Environment Scrutiny Commission. Not formal proposals at this atage but gives an idea of the direction of travel. There will have to be statutory consultation in due course.


http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s94318/Parking.pdf


A big chunk of East Dulwich is coloured magenta on the map, with "to be confirmed" against it - I expect that relates to dates, rather than existence of CPZ, as I believe a borough wide CPZ is contemplated by the overall council Movement Plan.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...