Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've now had (yesterday) my missing 'Christmas' magazine issue, 2 letters dated 21st November and some 'current' mail. So it does look as though they are delivering current plus a selection of backlog mail. And seem to be getting down to the bottom, as far as my mail is concerned - unless they are starting from there for their catch-up.


They did employ casuals over Christmas (not enough, evidently) but the old habit of employing teenagers for Christmas post has long gone - when they stopped 4 Christmas deliveries a day, and Sunday delivery, those casuals went.

Postie from the east dulwich/peckham office here. First of all, apologies for this mess which is Royal Mail and the delays you are all experiencing. The problems here have preceded the Covid pandemic, from the beginning which I first started working here, it?s been majorly disorganised with bad management. Too much work expected to be done when it is not physically possible and we the postal workers are working so hard day in day out, it?s so de-moralising. Since the pandemic it?s 100x worse, constantly bombarded with parcels non stop, tracked and special delivery?s take precedence. At the moment we have crates upon crates of letters not sorted and piles of non tracked parcels, leaving barely any room to walk. The reason why u will be getting newer post is because the old crates of mail haven?t been sorted, left to the bottom of the pile as it were. If the management were better, the walks would be rotated so they would all get cleared. Instead, there are some walks which are regularly cleared and some which are left to build up. So you can imagine due to the bad organisation that no one knows what is from December and what is recent, we just take out what we are told. There is also the problem of not enough trolleys/pda?s and vans and not enough staff. Don?t get me started on the state of the vans, they have not been cleaned inside or outside since I have been working there for 6 years. The public would be shocked at how disgusting they are, who would think Royal Mail vans would be like this. It really frustrates me as I do love the job but so many things can be improved. If they kept on top of it, it wouldn?t have been so bad. It makes sense right, if one walk hasn?t gone out one day, then u take a postie off a walk that has been cleared and put them on that walk, so all the walks are taken in turn to be cleared. But apparently no one has thought to do this. So there you have it, the real story of Royal Mail
To Loki286, I don't think there's one single person in ED who blames the posties for one minute for how inept the Royal Mail are management wise. You guys and girls are simply doing your jobs the best you can under extreme circumstances which has got worse under privatisation.

Thanks, Loki286. Fascinating and dispiriting


If you could send your post on to people such as Helen Hayes or anyone you think might listen - the Times and the BBC for London seem to be investigating at the moment, without endangering your job, it might be of some help to you and your colleagues (and us consumers)

There again....

What Loki286 writes is entirely consistent with what my local posties are saying, which suggests that he/ she is writing from an informed position. This does seem to be a failure of local management, and it is not surprising that they are hiding under the cloak of Covid - and probably hiding their failure as much as they can from Head Office. That the failure was precipitated by the closure of Sylvester Road - and the lack of capacity locally to move the work effectively - may be a function of Head Office cost requirements, but equally Sylvester Road had been identified, both by management and unions, as being well past its sell-by-date both in terms of coping with changed postal usage (more parcels, fewer letters) and in terms of staff facilities there - which were as Victorian as its design. It now appears, from press reports, that the Regulator (now Ofcom) is at least aware that there are issues, although I suspect they will be looking more closely at the general failures of delivery over the last few months; but the concentration of problems in London have not gone unnoticed, and local/ regional management may still get focused on (fingers crossed). Helen Hayes at least is aware that the problems locally well pre-date Covid, and will have the documented evidence to support that.

Pointlessly ,but out of curiosity,I'd like to know more about the sorting process and at what stage items are franked .


I believe that franking is part of the automated sorting process, so will take place at the first point of aggregation/ sorting of collected mail (business mail may be franked at source). The only unfranked mail that you receive where the fault may lie locally will be that posted locally - i.e. I believe that which in our case goes to the Croydon Sorting Office (remember SOs are different from the Delivery Offices (DOs) where our problems lie).

Another email from the Royal Mail.


We're sorry to advise that you may experience further disruption to deliveries in parts of the SE22 postcode area due to resourcing issues at our East Dulwich Delivery Office.


We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and thank you for your understanding.


We'll be back in touch to let you know when resourcing issues have improved.

Three separate deliveries today!


1. A second hand book I've already had a refund on from eBay because it didn't arrive - somewhat annoying because now in all fairness I have to let the seller know, and refund the refund, as it were.


2. A packet of fabric samples posted a few weeks back.


3. A Christmas card (no date on it), a Private Eye dated 10 - 17 December and a financial statement dated 14 January.


Since I took out the Private Eye subscription in November, this is only the second one I've got. The free Christmas cards that went with the subscription arrived last week (very usefully timed, not).


Royal Mail seems to be delivering a totally random assortment of stuff, but at least some of what is arriving is from January!


I am still waiting for some things which I know were posted in November/December.

A stand in postie pushed loads through today. I chatted to them - come from a town at least a hundred miles away and said Peckham was a right mess with trays and trays of old mail. Sickness from Covid and stress, etc. Offered to boss to do the same tomorrow - paid for from time of getting on train or bus, etc. to leaving said transport mode back at home town. Pretty lucrative but needs must, I suppose. (Don't want to say male or female or where from exactly as not fair.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...