Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I found making a murderer fascinating, but it was incredibly biased. I mean the first conviction, okay, he was totally stitched up. But not sure after that. Really sad story though, and his parents are heart breaking.



Had totally forgotten there's season 2 of Saul. Right, that's next on my list.


Came to house of cards late, so only just in to season 2. Am enjoying it still, but can see myself getting bored if it's just more of the same throughout.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am in your boat *Bob*....stuck with Blind Dates

> and Gogglebox; although that undercover police

> squad thing (name gone) I really enjoyed against

> expectations.


First Dates there - (I assume). Though I am enjoying the idea of you watching Blind Date repeats.


It sounds like we're living parallel lives. May the god of quality serialised drama bless us both soon and make everything better.

I know I'd hate Peaky Blinders so haven't even bothered looking. Not my bag. A friend of mine sent me the first series of Vinyl on a stick, which I enjoyed, though it certainly wasn't without fault. Second series of Better Call Saul was alright. I went though all seven series of Sons Of Anarchy and wish I hadn't as it was irritating me somewhat by series 3 or 4 as did Californication (the louche writer, Quids) but stuck with it. I may give Narcos a whirl. Is it worth a butcher's?

Started watching something called "I-Zombie". About a girl who becomes a zombie, but still tries to live a normal life. She takes a job in a morgue to get a fresh supply of brains to eat. But eating the brains gives her flashbacks from the dead person's memory, and she uses this to solve crimes.


I think one episode was enough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...