Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I' m so fed up with people leaving loo paper in the park. Small children run all over the place, and we constantly see other people's disgusting loo paper, hundreds of pieces every time.


Surely if someone needs to poo in the park, they ball it up, or bag it up, and take the loo paper home? If they find that disgusting, then why should anyone else find it less disgusting just dropped casually inside a children's den?


Feeling so annoyed that people think this is ok to do just because the loos are closed.


I get that people have to go in the park. But surely they do not have to leave loo paper for us to prise out of our toddler's curious hands.

unfortunately when people were told they could travel they did- that means that people are coming from far and wide to other peoples' locales. Then those people have to travel to fing a less crowded open space...no toilets are open and people are selfish.

I think the poo thing is people taking advantage of the scarcity of wardens/park staff around (and perhaps reduced park-goer numbers).

If you'd get caught short now, you would have done previously, most people don't want to use the park loos for number twos even when they're open. Everyone knows how to / is used to avoiding need for number two action when out at a park.

Cyclemonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The lack of places for a wee has somewhat limited

> our plans for outdoor socialising. However who

> are these people who can't be outside for a few

> hours without the need for a poo?


I always assumed some people are banned from using their own bathrooms :)

Cyclemonkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The lack of places for a wee has somewhat limited

> our plans for outdoor socialising. However who

> are these people who can't be outside for a few

> hours without the need for a poo?


When you read that people have travelled from London to Wales (because they thought they could but got turned back) then they will be the people who will be excreting all over the place

I do agree, the odd person may get caught short but for there to be loads about is revolting and a health hazard. I have also seen loads of discarded gloves and masks, broken glass (even more than usual) and last but not least, baby nappies full of poo discarded in the street. Take a bag and dispose at home or in the nearest bin. Extraordinary.
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...