Jump to content
Message added by Administrator,

This is a highly emotive topic. Please debate respectfully. Avoid making provocative statements, personal attacks and accusations against other forum members. 

You will be restricted from posting in this topic if you fail to abide by this.

Recommended Posts

I think that the west created the problem and has a role in solving this. It's not a one way street of anti-Israel propaganda, Israel is illegally occupying lands and is supporting/encouraging/implicit in criminal activity. That said you shouldn't be blinkered or assume everything is black and white. You'd also have to bring in the wider situation in the middle East, particularly Saudi and Iran. And a shame more moderate, progressive forces aren't more prominent in Israel.
Besides which there was a time when some of the Lounge was about debating different views and ideas. All Chick does is post links to anti-Israel stories, some of very dodgy provenance, there's no debate or argument just a drip drip of anti-Israel links. Personally I don't think it should be allowed and isn't what this forum is about (or used to be) but I'm not a moderator.

I don't like people posting links without some discussion of what this is about, more often than not I don't bother to open them as I think that this is a lazy way of debating. I get even more grumpy about poorly titled threads! But I am in a minority.


Back to the earlier post - pictures of kids being taken away by soldiers isn't great for Israel's image. OK so we had some pretty hardline policing the other day at the vigil, and the world's biggest democracy (US) at times is hardly a beacon of virtue. But this was a video of a real event and don't see an issue with it being shared whether it is from a website of disrepute or not.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But this was a video of a real event

> and don't see an issue with it being shared

> whether it is from a website of disrepute or not.


Isn't the problem here that when something is shared from a disreputable and/or shadily funded site, it quickly leads onto other stuff that might not be 'real'. It's why so many people end up getting lost down rabbit holes. By limking/sharing an item to these sites your inadvertently promoting/advocating all the shady/conspiracy nonsense they try to peddle...

I expect you and I are pretty aware of bias's, fake news and the like on the web. I can't start any conversation with "according to the Guardian". I may say that I've read something in it, or wherever. But of course we all like/select articles/organisations that support/confirm our views and it can be easy to lose objectivity or worse still as you point out, get drawn into some dark spaces.


Do others have a a view? Common Cat, why the silence?!

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Besides which there was a time when some of the

> Lounge was about debating different views and

> ideas. All Chick does is post links to anti-Israel

> stories, some of very dodgy provenance, there's no

> debate or argument just a drip drip of anti-Israel

> links. Personally I don't think it should be

> allowed and isn't what this forum is about (or

> used to be) but I'm not a moderator.


Pointing out human rights abuses by the state of Israel, the IDF and illegal settlers isn?t anti Israeli propaganda any more than criticising South African apartheid was anti South Africa propaganda.


I also post links from Jews for Justice for Palestine, The Washington Post, Channel four news, the Independent, in future I?ll include Human Rights Watch and B?Tselem when relevant.


If you want to debate the rights and wrongs of Hamas you can start your own thread.

  • 3 weeks later...

To be fair, details matter. There are grey areas (shaped by ideological politics) and then there are areas that are clear breaches of what is acceptable. To illustrate - annexation of the Gaza Strip in any measure is not acceptable. Extension of any part of the Israeli border in any form, is not acceptable.


So this is where I sit on Israel (as a left leaning centrist). Israel has the right to exist. She also has the right to defend herself from Hamas led terrorism. She does not however, have the right to use any of that to expand the borders given to her, and that is the issue here. Illegal settlements (not my words but those of the UN) that no-one can challenge (because she is backed by a nuclear superpower) have led to an idea that Israel can annex a third of the Gaza Strip. Why? Because when someone pushes at the boundaries of acceptability, and no-one physically objects.......you know how it goes.


No-one should be attacking Chick or anyone for having this thread. It is an issue that is clearly important to him/her, and there is a sensible discussion to be had. And to be fair to Chick, you don't have to scroll back too far to find him/her acknowledging I made a fair point when challenging something he/she posted.

  • 2 weeks later...

I'd like to know more about this and views of others. So this is when an immovable force meets an unstoppable object. Both hardline traditional/extreme authorities. But asymmetric that one side has vastly superior technology and is effectively propped up by the US.


Aggressions by both sides are looked on as war crimes. Death and destruction will be much greater in Gaza. There seems to be no middle ground or compromise from either side, which I expect has popular support.


Personally Israel should withdraw from occupied territories (and meet all the UN resolutions), remove settlers and try to build some bridges with their Palestinian residents. Their human rights record is something not to be proud of. But I can still not rationalise this when their is an extremist regime in Palestine.


Sorry this is all a bit simplistic, and I should read up on the subject (beyond Wiki) but perhaps others can explain things to me objectively.


I visited Israel in the late 90s meeting Palestinians and Jews, staying with both groups. Jerusalem was one of the most amazing cities I've been to, the old city was a medieval melting pot. I understand new developments have blighted the City somewhat.

Chick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A different perspective.

> >

> >

> https://www.thejc.com/comment/opinion/is-israel-di

>

> >

> scriminating-against-palestinians-with-vaccine-1.5

>

> > 10338

>

> To be expected.



There are over 2m Israeli arabs, they are just as entitled as Israeli jews to get a vaccine and indeed get them.

The below link will send a prewritten email to your local MP telling them to take action for Palestine. All you need to do is enter your postcode, then complete with your name and address. It takes less than a minute.


https://www.foa.org.uk/campaign/save-sheikh-jarrah/

  • 5 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...