Jump to content

Recommended Posts

alexdelis Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The majority of the public love Wagamamas it would

> do great, easily one of my favourite restaurants.

>

> Most of the people who post on here are miserable

> arseholes


3 posts. 1 advertising yourself as a Web Designer...

Then insulting the very people you are seeking work from..


Fox.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> alexdelis Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The majority of the public love Wagamamas it

> would

> > do great, easily one of my favourite

> restaurants.

> >

> > Most of the people who post on here are

> miserable

> > arseholes

>

> 3 posts. 1 advertising yourself as a Web

> Designer...

> Then insulting the very people you are seeking

> work from..

>

> Fox.


I was just about to make the same observation. Not too sharp...

Oh I can't think of anything more commercial or ghastly! I have one round the corner from where I work. The food is overpriced and in my view sub standard quality. I would rather have an independent Japanese outlet. There are loads in soho and on Piccadilly and they are generally very good with a more authentic feel.

alexdelis Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The majority of the public love Wagamamas it would

> do great, easily one of my favourite restaurants.

>

> Most of the people who post on here are miserable

> arseholes


People who don't share your taste in restaurants are miserable bastards?


That's nice.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My bigger problem with Wagamamma, aside from

> stifling independent business by hiking up rents,

> would be their appalling food. Mass produced

> gunk-covered meat and pretty average bowls of

> soup-a-like for a big pile of golden nuggets.

>

> I'd prefer a Pho if we must have some

> vaguely-east-Asian-cuisine chain.



Usually I don't particularly agree with David about mass produced food, but on this occasion, a very big What David Said!


Only been once, and was looking forward to it. I left wondering why everyone was still raving about it having eaten the same stuff I'd just eaten.

Wagamama 10/12 years ago fitted the bill - the seating arrangements, the ordering and the food all seemed different and FUN - great for a meal before or after a film or whatever - even then it wasn't a destination restaurant. Now so many restaurants have similar arrangements that it is no longer original or fun and therefore needs to rely on the quality of food to get repeat custom................

Wagamamas is ok at best, at times of need it does a job.


It really wouldn't work in LL though.


Can someone reading this thread who is thinking of setting up a food business please open a Vietnamese or noodle restaurant (specifically Ramen) Something like Momofoku Noodle Bar would be amazing.


Case closed.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ramen is rubbish. Bland soup for boring foodies to

> eat just so they can tell us that "it's not like

> the real thing, you know".


Hm a bit like a Japanese person saying "Sandwiches are awful. Tasteless bread for people with no imagination and creativity"

paulipedia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Ramen is rubbish. Bland soup for boring foodies

> to

> > eat just so they can tell us that "it's not

> like

> > the real thing, you know".

>

> Hm a bit like a Japanese person saying "Sandwiches

> are awful. Tasteless bread for people with no

> imagination and creativity"



Have you ever eaten a sandwich in Japan? They're awful - nothing like the proper english sandwiches, you know.

Aw so nice!


Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> paulipedia Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jeremy Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Ramen is rubbish. Bland soup for boring

> foodies

> > to

> > > eat just so they can tell us that "it's not

> > like

> > > the real thing, you know".

> >

> > Hm a bit like a Japanese person saying

> "Sandwiches

> > are awful. Tasteless bread for people with no

> > imagination and creativity"

>

>

> Have you ever eaten a sandwich in Japan? They're

> awful - nothing like the proper english

> sandwiches, you know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...