Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anybody else noticed a pattern of driving styles on the different buses? 63 drivers seem in general a calm and steady bunch but I've always found the 176 drivers to be frustrated boy racers who aim for maximum acceleration between stops, making for a lurchy ride.
The 12 and the 63, 263, 197 can get caught up in Peckham, where the police and the usually super-efficient traffic wardens don't ticket the lorries and minivans that quite often park on the yellow lines. When there is a jam it can take a looooong time for the buses to get through. Nero

The 12 can also be a nightmare around waterloo/westminster. Took me 2 hours once from the Plough to Piccadilly... made me late for the theatre grrrrrr!


I have noticed the 176 in the evenings (from say 8pm) to be more frequent travel through ED lately. Maybe Arriva have more drivers at the Norwood Garage these days ;-)

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The 12 and the 63, 263, 197 can get caught up in

> Peckham, where the police and the usually

> super-efficient traffic wardens don't ticket the

> lorries and minivans that quite often park on the

> yellow lines. When there is a jam it can take a

> looooong time for the buses to get through. Nero


Nero, you must have been on one of the same buses as me this morning! Two number 12 buses both tried to overtake vans parked on the double yellows at the same time and got "locked" with no room for either to get round their respective obstable or each other. 20 mins of reversing/forward 2" or so, and lots of folding mirrors in - finally resolved by one of the van drivers being located and made to move his van a bit further onto the pavement to give the bendy bit of the bus a chance to move through. Poor driving all round, but actually quite funny once I'd reconciled myself to running late...

KK - The 12 goes from Whitehall and Regent Street. Hop on at the start of the journey and you'll get a seat. I hate the 666 (my preferred name for the 176) too. A few years ago the buses were like something out of the 20s - wooden, grooved floors and scratchy seat fur. Nero
  • 4 months later...

Quick question, and this seems like the most relevant thread to ask it!


Need to head into Dulwich next week on the 176, been told by a friend to meet up at the Dulwich Harvester bus stop, somewhere between East Dulwich and Forest Hill... does anyone know the "proper" name for this stop, ie that I can find on TFL bus route maps etc? Anyone know the approximate time for the 176 to get to the Harvester from Waterloo in the early evening?


Much obliged for all help...

  • 2 weeks later...

I have been travelling on the 176 for about 3 years now because I just couldn't cope with the cattle truck conditions on the trains.

I catch the bus near Lawrie Park Road SE20 and travel to the Strand End of Waterloo Bridge. I actually need to go to Tottencourt Road but unfortunately the amount of time it takes the bus to travel along the Strand and around Trafalgar Square, it it quicker for me to get off at Waterlool Bridge and walk through Covent Garden.


I have nothing but contempt for Arriva buses who refuse to take any complaints seriously. Over the years I have complained about:

Heaters being left on in the summer

Heaters being left off in the winter

Drivers not alerting passengers about diversions or temporary closure of bus stops

Journeys being curtailed without notice

When the journeys are curtailed the driver refuses to provide tickets for the next bus

Drivers never explaining why the journey have been curtailed.

Changing drivers half way round the route and having to wait for the new driver. Why isn't the new driver waiting at the bus stop?

I am also concerned the TFL seem to spend most of their time defending the totally inadequate bus companies instead of defending the passengers they are supposed to represent.

Despite my complaints all the above continue to happen despite assurances for TFL and Arriva.


Things will only get worse now that Ken Livingstone is no longer Mayor. What worries me is that when Boris removes all the bendy buses (I am no lover of them myself but see them as a necessary evil) and replaces them with traditional buses, where will all the drivers come from. I see cuts to routes coming.


I also believe things will only get worse now that Boris has taken over. I remember Margaret Thatcher saying that anyone over 35 who catches a bus is a failure.


If Boris wants people to get out of cars and onto buses he must improve the service but I suppose he has other priorities like looking after his friends with their ?70.000 Range Rovers who live in the West of London.

176depressive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Things will only get worse now that Ken

> Livingstone is no longer Mayor. What worries me

> is that when Boris removes all the bendy buses (I

> am no lover of them myself but see them as a

> necessary evil) and replaces them with traditional

> buses, where will all the drivers come from. I see

> cuts to routes coming.

>

> I also believe things will only get worse now that

> Boris has taken over. I remember Margaret

> Thatcher saying that anyone over 35 who catches a

> bus is a failure.

>

> If Boris wants people to get out of cars and onto

> buses he must improve the service but I suppose he

> has other priorities like looking after his

> friends with their ?70.000 Range Rovers who live

> in the West of London.


Hello and welcome to the EDF 176.


Why do you reckon that 'bendies' are a necessary evil. Why were they necessary in the first place?

If it's about wheelchair/pram access, I think that was taken care of with the modern double-deckers.

Where will all the drivers come from? Thebendies presumably.

Why will things get worse under Boris? Why would the improved bus service that Livingstone brought about be ruined by Johnson?

Why would he do that? He seems to be going out of his way to be populist. His recent sackings have indicated a certain craveness on his part, that he should watch I think.

Just getting back to buses, it was livingstone who said something along the lines of 'only a souless moron would get rid of the Routemaster' I paraphrase, but that was the gist. He then proceeded to... well you know.


I trust Johnson as much as I trusted Livingston. Never voted for either one, as I went for more 'left-field' candidates.

Wait and see what Johnson actually does about transport, before you make judgements.

Sorry that makes me sound bossy, doesn't it?


Anyway, welcome and get on the Song Game and Word Association threads, they're bundles of fun. Honest.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years      
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...